Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 Text with EEA relevance
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Article 79a
Assessment of compliance with the conditions for own funds and eligible liabilities instruments
Institutions shall have regard to the substantial features of instruments and not only their legal form when assessing compliance with the requirements laid down in Part Two. The assessment of the substantial features of an instrument shall take into account all arrangements related to the instruments, even where those are not explicitly set out in the terms and conditions of the instruments themselves, for the purpose of determining that the combined economic effects of such arrangements are compliant with the objective of the relevant provisions.
Article 80
Continuing review of the quality of own funds and eligible liabilities instruments
EBA shall monitor the quality of own funds and eligible liabilities instruments issued by institutions across the Union and shall notify the Commission immediately where there is significant evidence that those instruments do not meet the respective eligibility criteria set out in this Regulation.
Competent authorities shall, without delay and upon request by EBA, forward all information to EBA that EBA considers relevant concerning new capital instruments or new types of liabilities issued in order to enable EBA to monitor the quality of own funds and eligible liabilities instruments issued by institutions across the Union.
A notification shall include the following:
- (a) a detailed explanation of the nature and extent of the shortfall identified;
- (b) technical advice on the action by the Commission that EBA considers to be necessary;
- (c) significant developments in the methodology of EBA for stress testing the solvency of institutions.
EBA shall provide technical advice to the Commission on any significant changes it considers to be required to the definition of own funds and eligible liabilities as a result of any of the following:
- (a) relevant developments in market standards or practice;
- (b) changes in relevant legal or accounting standards;
- (c) significant developments in the methodology of EBA for stress testing the solvency of institutions.
EBA shall provide technical advice to the Commission by 1 January 2014 on possible treatments of unrealised gains measured at fair value other than including them in Common Equity Tier 1 without adjustment. Such recommendations shall take into account relevant developments in international accounting standards and in international agreements on prudential standards for banks.
TITLE II MINORITY INTEREST AND ADDITIONAL TIER 1 AND TIER 2 INSTRUMENTS ISSUED BY SUBSIDIARIES
Article 81
Minority interests that qualify for inclusion in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Minority interests shall comprise the sum of Common Equity Tier 1 items of a subsidiary where the following conditions are met:
- (a) the subsidiary is one of the following:
- (i) an institution;
- (ii) an undertaking that is subject by virtue of applicable national law to the requirements of this Regulation and of Directive 2013/36/EU;
- (iii) an intermediate financial holding company or intermediate mixed financial holding company that is subject to the requirements of this Regulation on a sub‐consolidated basis, or an intermediate investment holding company that is subject to the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 on a consolidated basis;
- (iv) an investment firm;
- (v) an intermediate financial holding company in a third country, provided that that intermediate financial holding company is subject to prudential requirements as stringent as those applied to credit institutions of that third country and provided that the Commission has adopted a decision in accordance with Article 107(4) determining that those prudential requirements are at least equivalent to those of this Regulation;
- (b) the subsidiary is included fully in the consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One;
- (c) the Common Equity Tier 1 items, referred to in the introductory part of this paragraph, are owned by persons other than the undertakings included in the consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One.
Minority interests that are funded directly or indirectly, through a special purpose entity or otherwise, by the parent undertaking of the institution, or its subsidiaries shall not qualify as consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
Article 82
Qualifying Additional Tier 1, Tier 1, Tier 2 capital and qualifying own funds
Qualifying Additional Tier 1, Tier 1, Tier 2 capital and qualifying own funds shall comprise the minority interest, Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments, as applicable, plus the related share premium accounts, of a subsidiary where the following conditions are met:
- (a) the subsidiary is one of the following:
- (i) an institution;
- (ii) an undertaking that is subject by virtue of applicable national law to the requirements of this Regulation and of Directive 2013/36/EU;
- (iii) an intermediate financial holding company or intermediate mixed financial holding company that is subject to the requirements of this Regulation on a sub‐consolidated basis, or an intermediate investment holding company that is subject to the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 on a consolidated basis;
- (iv) an investment firm;
- (v) an intermediate financial holding company in a third country, provided that that intermediate financial holding company is subject to prudential requirements as stringent as those applied to credit institutions of that third country and provided that the Commission has adopted a decision in accordance with Article 107(4) determining that those prudential requirements are at least equivalent to those of this Regulation;
- (b) the subsidiary is included fully in the scope of consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One;
- (c) the Common Equity Tier 1 items, Additional Tier 1 items and Tier 2 items referred to in the introductory part of this paragraph, are owned by persons other than the undertakings included in the consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One.
Article 83
Qualifying Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital issued by a special purpose entity
Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments issued by a special purpose entity, and the related share premium accounts, are included until 31 December 2021 in qualifying Additional Tier 1, Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital or qualifying own funds, as applicable, only where the following conditions are met:
- (a) the special purpose entity issuing those instruments is included fully in the consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One;
- (b) the instruments, and the related share premium accounts, are included in qualifying Additional Tier 1 capital only where the conditions laid down in Article 52(1) are satisfied;
- (c) the instruments, and the related share premium accounts, are included in qualifying Tier 2 capital only where the conditions laid down in Article 63 are satisfied;
- (d) the only asset of the special purpose entity is its investment in the own funds of the parent undertaking or a subsidiary thereof that is included fully in the consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One, the form of which satisfies the relevant conditions laid down in Articles 52(1) or 63, as applicable.
Where the competent authority considers the assets of a special purpose entity other than its investment in the own funds of the parent undertaking or a subsidiary thereof that is included in the scope of consolidation pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title II of Part One, to be minimal and insignificant for such an entity, the competent authority may waive the condition specified in point (d) of the first subparagraph.
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the types of assets that can relate to the operation of special purpose entities and the concepts of minimal and insignificant referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 28 July 2013.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Article 84
Minority interests included in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital
Institutions shall determine the amount of minority interests of a subsidiary that is included in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital by subtracting from the minority interests of that undertaking the result of multiplying the amount referred to in point (a) by the percentage referred to in point (b) as follows:
- (a) the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the subsidiary minus the lower of the following:
- (i) the amount of Common Equity Tier 1 capital of that subsidiary required to meet the following:
- (1) where the subsidiary is one of those listed in Article 81(1), point (a), of this Regulation but not an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (a), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries insofar as those requirements are to be met by Common Equity Tier 1 capital;
- (2) where the subsidiary is an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 39(2), point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/2034, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries, insofar as those requirements are to be met by Common Equity Tier 1 capital;
- (ii) the amount of consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital that relates to that subsidiary that is required on a consolidated basis to meet the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (a), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries, insofar as those requirements are to be met by Common Equity Tier 1 capital;
- (b) the minority interests of the subsidiary expressed as a percentage of all Common Equity Tier 1 items of that undertaking.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (a), the competent authority may allow an institution to subtract either of the amounts referred to in point (a)(i) or (ii), once that institution has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent authority that the additional amount of minority interest is available to absorb losses at consolidated level.
The calculation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be undertaken on a sub-consolidated basis for each subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1).
An institution may choose not to undertake this calculation for a subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1). Where an institution takes such a decision, the minority interest of that subsidiary may not be included in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
Where a competent authority derogates from the application of prudential requirements on an individual basis, as laid down in Article 7 of this Regulation or, as applicable, as laid down in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, minority interests within the subsidiaries to which the waiver is applied shall not be recognised in own funds at the sub‐consolidated or at the consolidated level, as applicable.
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the sub-consolidation calculation required in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, Articles 85 and 87.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 28 July 2013.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Competent authorities may grant a waiver from the application of this Article to a parent financial holding company that satisfies all the following conditions:
- (a) its principal activity is to acquire holdings;
- (b) it is subject to prudential supervision on a consolidated basis;
- (c) it consolidates a subsidiary institution in which it has only a minority holding by virtue of the control relationship within the meaning of Article 4(1), point (37);
- (d) more than 90 % of the consolidated required Common Equity Tier 1 capital arises from the subsidiary institution referred to in point c) calculated on a sub-consolidated basis.
Where, after 28 June 2013, a parent financial holding company that meets the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph becomes a parent mixed financial holding company, competent authorities may grant the waiver referred to in the first subparagraph to that parent mixed financial holding company provided that it meets the conditions laid down in that subparagraph.
Where credit institutions permanently affiliated in a network to a central body and institutions established within an institutional protection scheme subject to the conditions laid down in Article 113(7) have set up a cross-guarantee scheme that provides that there is no current or foreseen material, practical or legal impediment to the transfer of the amount of own funds above the regulatory requirements from the counterparty to the credit institution, these institutions are exempted from the provisions of this Article regarding deductions and may recognise any minority interest arising within the cross-guarantee scheme in full.
Article 85
Qualifying Tier 1 instruments included in consolidated Tier 1 capital
Institutions shall determine the amount of qualifying Tier 1 capital of a subsidiary that is included in consolidated own funds by subtracting from the qualifying Tier 1 capital of that undertaking the result of multiplying the amount referred to in point (a) by the percentage referred to in point (b) as follows:
- (a) the Tier 1 capital of the subsidiary minus the lower of the following:
- (i) the amount of Tier 1 capital of the subsidiary required to meet the following:
- (1) where the subsidiary is one of those listed in Article 81(1), point (a), of this Regulation but not an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (b), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries insofar as those requirements are to be met by Tier 1 capital;
- (2) where the subsidiary is an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 39(2), point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/2034, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries insofar as those requirements are to be met by Tier 1 capital;
- (ii) the amount of consolidated Tier 1 capital that relates to that subsidiary that is required on a consolidated basis to meet the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (b), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries, insofar as those requirements are to be met by Tier 1 capital;
- (b) the qualifying Tier 1 capital of the subsidiary expressed as a percentage of all Common Equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1 items of that undertaking.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (a), the competent authority may allow an institution to subtract either of the amounts referred to in point (a)(i) or (ii), once that institution has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent authority that the additional amount of Tier 1 capital is available to absorb losses at consolidated level.
The calculation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be undertaken on a sub-consolidated basis for each subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1).
An institution may choose not to undertake this calculation for a subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1). Where an institution takes such a decision, the qualifying Tier 1 capital of that subsidiary may not be included in consolidated Tier 1 capital.
Where a competent authority derogates from the application of prudential requirements on an individual basis, as laid down in Article 7 of this Regulation or, where applicable, as laid down in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, Tier 1 instruments within the subsidiaries to which the waiver is applied shall not be recognised as own funds at the sub‐consolidated or at the consolidated level, as applicable.
Article 86
Qualifying Tier 1 capital included in consolidated Additional Tier 1 capital
Without prejudice to Article 84 (5) or (6), institutions shall determine the amount of qualifying Tier 1 capital of a subsidiary that is included in consolidated Additional Tier 1 capital by subtracting from the qualifying Tier 1 capital of that undertaking included in consolidated Tier 1 capital the minority interests of that undertaking that are included in consolidated Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
Article 87
Qualifying own funds included in consolidated own funds
Institutions shall determine the amount of qualifying own funds of a subsidiary that is included in consolidated own funds by subtracting from the qualifying own funds of that undertaking the result of multiplying the amount referred to in point (a) by the percentage referred to in point (b) as follows:
- (a) the own funds of the subsidiary minus the lower of the following:
- (i) the amount of own funds of the subsidiary required to meet the following:
- (1) where the subsidiary is one of those listed in Article 81(1), point (a), of this Regulation but not an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (c), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries insofar as those requirements are to be met by own funds;
- (2) where the subsidiary is an investment firm or an intermediate investment holding company, the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 39(2), point (a), of Directive (EU) 2019/2034, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries insofar as those requirements are to be met by own funds;
- (ii) the amount of own funds that relates to that subsidiary that is required on a consolidated basis to meet the sum of the requirement laid down in Article 92(1), point (c), of this Regulation, the requirements referred to in Articles 458 and 459 of this Regulation, the specific own funds requirements referred to in Article 104 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the combined buffer requirement defined in Article 128, point (6), of that Directive, or any local supervisory regulations in third countries, insofar as those requirements are to be met by own funds;
- (b) the qualifying own funds of the undertaking, expressed as a percentage of the sum of all the Common Equity Tier 1 items, Additional Tier 1 items and Tier 2 items, excluding the amounts referred to in points (c) and (d) of Article 62, of that undertaking.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, point (a), the competent authority may allow an institution to subtract either of the amounts referred to in point (a)(i) or (ii), once that institution has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent authority that the additional amount of own funds is available to absorb losses at consolidated level.
The calculation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be undertaken on a sub-consolidated basis for each subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1).
An institution may choose not to undertake this calculation for a subsidiary referred to in Article 81(1). Where an institution takes such a decision, the qualifying own funds of that subsidiary may not be included in consolidated own funds.
Where a competent authority derogates from the application of prudential requirements on an individual basis, as laid down in Article 7 of this Regulation or, as applicable, as laid down in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, own funds instruments within the subsidiaries to which the waiver is applied shall not be recognised as own funds at the sub‐consolidated or at the consolidated level, as applicable.
Article 88
Qualifying own funds instruments included in consolidated Tier 2 capital
Without prejudice to Article 84(5) or (6), institutions shall determine the amount of qualifying own funds of a subsidiary that is included in consolidated Tier 2 capital by subtracting from the qualifying own funds of that undertaking that are included in consolidated own funds the qualifying Tier 1 capital of that undertaking that is included in consolidated Tier 1 capital.
Article 88a
Qualifying eligible liabilities instruments
Liabilities issued by a subsidiary established in the Union that belongs to the same resolution group as the resolution entity shall qualify for inclusion in the consolidated eligible liabilities instruments of an institution subject to Article 92a, provided that all the following conditions are met:
- (a) they are issued in accordance with point (a) of Article 45f(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU;
- (b) they are bought by an existing shareholder that is not part of the same resolution group as long as the exercise of the write-down or conversion powers in accordance with Articles 59 to 62 of Directive 2014/59/EU does not affect the control of the subsidiary by the resolution entity;
- (c) they do not exceed the amount determined by subtracting the amount referred to in point (i) from the amount referred to in point (ii):
- (i) the sum of the liabilities issued to and bought by the resolution entity either directly or indirectly through other entities in the same resolution group and the amount of own funds instruments issued in accordance with point (b) of Article 45f(2) of Directive 2014/59/EU;
- (ii) the amount required in accordance with Article 45f(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Article 88b
Undertakings in third countries
For the purposes of this Title, the terms ‘investment firm’ and ‘institution’ shall be understood to include undertakings established in third countries, which would, if established in the Union, fall under the definitions of those terms in this Regulation.
TITLE III QUALIFYING HOLDINGS OUTSIDE THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
Article 89
Risk weighting and prohibition of qualifying holdings outside the financial sector
A qualifying holding, the amount of which exceeds 15 % of the eligible capital of the institution, in an undertaking which is not a financial sector entity, shall be subject to the provisions laid down in paragraph 3.
The total amount of the qualifying holdings of an institution in undertakings other than those referred to in paragraph 1 that exceeds 60 % of its eligible capital shall be subject to paragraph 3.
Competent authorities shall apply the requirements laid down in point (a) or (b) to qualifying holdings of institutions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2:
- (a) for the purpose of calculating the capital requirement in accordance with Part Three, institutions shall apply a risk weight of 1 250 % to the greater of the following:
- (i) the amount of qualifying holdings referred to in paragraph 1 in excess of 15 % of eligible capital;
- (ii) the total amount of qualifying holdings referred to in paragraph 2 that exceed 60 % of the eligible capital of the institution;
- (b) the competent authorities shall prohibit institutions from having qualifying holdings referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 the amount of which exceeds the percentages of eligible capital laid down in those paragraphs.
Competent authorities shall publish their choice of (a) or (b).
Article 90
Alternative to 1 250 % risk weight
As an alternative to applying a 1 250 % risk weight to the amounts in excess of the limits specified in Article 89(1) and (2), institutions may deduct those amounts from Common Equity Tier 1 items in accordance with point (k) of Article 36(1).
Article 91
Exceptions
Shares of undertakings not referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 89(1) shall not be included in calculating the eligible capital limits specified in that Article where any of the following conditions is met:
- (a) those shares are held temporarily during a financial assistance operation as referred to in Article 79;
- (b) the holding of those shares is an underwriting position held for five working days or fewer;
- (c) those shares are held in the own name of the institution and on behalf of others.
Shares which are not financial fixed assets as referred to in Article 35(2) of Directive 86/635/EEC shall not be included in the calculation specified in Article 89.
PART THREE
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
TITLE I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, VALUATION AND REPORTING
CHAPTER 1 Required level of own funds
Section 1 Own funds requirements for institutions
Article 92
Own funds requirements
Subject to Articles 93 and 94, institutions shall at all times satisfy the following own funds requirements:
- (a) a Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4,5 %;
- (b) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6 %;
- (c) a total capital ratio of 8 %;
- (d) a leverage ratio of 3 %.
1a. In addition to the requirement laid down in point (d) of paragraph 1 of this Article, a G-SII shall maintain a leverage ratio buffer equal to the G-SIIs total exposure measure referred to in Article 429(4) of this Regulation multiplied by 50 % of the G-SII buffer rate applicable to the G-SII in accordance with Article 131 of Directive 2013/36/EU.
A G-SII shall meet the leverage ratio buffer requirement with Tier 1 capital only. Tier 1 capital that is used to meet the leverage ratio buffer requirement shall not be used towards meeting any of the leverage based requirements set out in this Regulation and in Directive 2013/36/EU, unless explicitly otherwise provided therein.
Where a G-SII does not meet the leverage ratio buffer requirement, it shall be subject to the capital conservation requirement in accordance with Article 141b of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Where a G-SII does not meet at the same time the leverage ratio buffer requirement and the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of Article 128 of Directive 2013/36/EU, it shall be subject to the higher of the capital conservation requirements in accordance with Articles 141 and 141b of that Directive.
Institutions shall calculate their capital ratios as follows:
- (a) the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio is the Common Equity Tier 1 capital of the institution expressed as a percentage of the total risk exposure amount;
- (b) the Tier 1 capital ratio is the Tier 1 capital of the institution expressed as a percentage of the total risk exposure amount;
- (c) the total capital ratio is the own funds of the institution expressed as a percentage of the total risk exposure amount.
Institutions shall calculate the total risk exposure amount as follows:
TREA = max{U-TREA; x · S-TREA}
where:
- TREA = the total risk exposure amount of the entity;
- U-TREA = the un-floored total risk exposure amount of the entity calculated in accordance with paragraph 4;
- S-TREA = the standardised total risk exposure amount of the entity calculated in accordance with paragraph 5;
- x = 72,5 %.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of this paragraph, a Member State may decide that the total risk exposure amount shall be the un-floored total risk exposure amount, calculated in accordance with paragraph 4, for institutions which are part of a group with a parent institution in the same Member State, provided that that parent institution or, in the case of groups composed of a central body and permanently affiliated institutions, the whole as constituted by the central body together with its affiliated institutions, calculates its total risk exposure amount in accordance with the first subparagraph of this paragraph on a consolidated basis.
The un-floored total risk exposure amount shall be calculated as the sum of points (a) to (g) of this paragraph after having taken into account paragraph 6 of this Article:
- (a) the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, including counterparty credit risk, and dilution risk, calculated in accordance with Title II of this Part and Article 379, in respect of all business activities of an institution, excluding risk-weighted exposure amounts from the trading-book business of the institution;
- (b) the own funds requirements for the trading-book business of an institution for the following:
- (i) market risk, calculated in accordance with Title IV of this Part;
- (ii) large exposures exceeding the limits specified in Articles 395 to 401, to the extent that an institution is permitted to exceed those limits, as determined in accordance with Part Four;
- (c) the own funds requirements for market risk, calculated in accordance with Title IV of this Part for all non-trading book business activities that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk;
- (d) the own funds requirements for settlement risk, calculated in accordance with Articles 378 and 380;
- (e) the own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment risk, calculated in accordance with Title VI of this Part;
- (f) the own funds requirements for operational risk, calculated in accordance with Title III of this Part;
- (g) the risk-weighted exposure amounts for counterparty credit risk arising from the trading book business of the institution for the following types of transactions and agreements, calculated in accordance with Title II of this Part:
- (i) contracts listed in Annex II and credit derivatives;
- (ii) repurchase transactions, securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions based on securities or commodities;
- (iii) margin lending transactions based on securities or commodities;
- (iv) long settlement transactions.
The standardised total risk exposure amount shall be calculated as the sum of paragraph 4, points (a) to (g), after having taken into account paragraph 6 and the following requirements:
- (a) the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk, including counterparty credit risk, and dilution risk, referred to in paragraph 4, point (a), and for counterparty credit risk arising from the trading book business of the institution as referred to in point (g) of that paragraph shall be calculated without using any of the following approaches:
- (i) the internal model approach for master netting agreements set out in Article 221;
- (ii) the Internal Ratings Based Approach set out in Title II, Chapter 3;
- (iii) the Securitisation Internal Ratings Based Approach set out in Articles 258, 259 and 260 and the Internal Assessment Approach set out in Article 265;
- (iv) the Internal Model Method set out in Title II, Chapter 6, Section 6;
- (b) the own funds requirements for market risk for the trading book business referred to in paragraph 4, point (b)(i), shall be calculated without using:
- (i) the alternative internal model approach set out in Title IV, Chapter 1b; or
- (ii) any approach listed under point (a) of this paragraph, where applicable;
- (c) the own funds requirements for all non-trading book business activities of an institution that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk referred to in paragraph 4, point (c), of this Article shall be calculated without using the alternative internal model approach set out in Title IV, Chapter 1b.
The following provisions shall apply to the calculations of the un-floored total risk exposure amount referred to in paragraph 4 and of the standardised total risk exposure amount referred to in paragraph 5:
- (a) the own funds requirements referred to in paragraph 4, points (d), (e) and (f), shall include those arising from all business activities of an institution;
- (b) institutions shall multiply the own funds requirements set out in paragraph 4, points (b) to (f), by 12,5 .
Article 92a
Requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities for G-SIIs
Subject to Articles 93 and 94 and to the exceptions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article, institutions identified as resolution entities and that are G-SII entities shall at all times satisfy the following requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities:
- (a) a risk-based ratio of 18 %, representing the own funds and eligible liabilities of the institution expressed as a percentage of the total risk exposure amount calculated in accordance with Article 92(3);
- (b) a non-risk-based ratio of 6,75 %, representing the own funds and eligible liabilities of the institution expressed as a percentage of the total exposure measure referred to in Article 429(4).
The requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall not apply in the following cases:
- (a) within the three years following the date on which the institution or the group of which the institution is part has been identified as a G-SII;
- (b) within the two years following the date on which the resolution authority has applied the bail-in tool in accordance with Directive 2014/59/EU;
- (c) within the two years following the date on which the resolution entity has put in place an alternative private sector measure referred to in point (b) of Article 32(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU by which capital instruments and other liabilities have been written down or converted into Common Equity Tier 1 items in order to recapitalise the resolution entity without the application of resolution tools.
Article 92b
Requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities for non-EU G-SIIs
Institutions that are material subsidiaries of non-EU G-SIIs and that are not resolution entities shall at all times satisfy requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities equal to 90 % of the requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities laid down in Article 92a.
For the purpose of complying with paragraph 1, Additional Tier 1, Tier 2 and eligible liabilities instruments shall only be taken into account where those instruments are owned by the ultimate parent undertaking of the non-EU G-SII and have been issued directly or indirectly through other entities within the same group, provided that all such entities are established in the same third country as that ultimate parent undertaking or in a Member State.
An eligible liabilities instrument shall only be taken into account for the purpose of complying with paragraph 1 where it fulfils all the following additional conditions:
- (a) in the event of normal insolvency proceedings as defined in point (47) of Article 2(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, the claim resulting from the liability ranks below claims resulting from liabilities that do not fulfil the conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this Article and that do not qualify as own funds;
- (b) it is subject to the write-down or conversion powers in accordance with Articles 59 to 62 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Article 93
Initial capital requirement on going concern
The own funds of an institution may not fall below the amount of initial capital required at the time of its authorisation.
Credit institutions that were already in existence on 1 January 1993, the amount of own funds of which do not attain the amount of initial capital required may continue to carry out their activities. In that event, the amount of own funds of those institutions may not fall below the highest level reached with effect from 22 December 1989.
Where control of an institution falling within the category referred to in paragraph 2 is taken by a natural or legal person other than the person who controlled the institution previously, the amount of own funds of that institution shall attain the amount of initial capital required.
Where there is a merger of two or more institutions falling within the category referred to in paragraph 2, the amount of own funds of the institution resulting from the merger shall not fall below the total own funds of the merged institutions at the time of the merger, as long as the amount of initial capital required has not been attained.
Where competent authorities consider it necessary to ensure the solvency of an institution that the requirement laid down in paragraph 1 be met, the provisions laid down in paragraphs 2, 4 and 5 shall not apply.
Article 94
Derogation for small trading book business
By way of derogation from Article 92(4), point (b), and Article 92(5), point (b), institutions may calculate the own funds requirement for their trading-book business in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, provided that the size of the institutions’ on- and off-balance-sheet trading-book business is equal to or less than both of the following thresholds on the basis of an assessment carried out on a monthly basis using the data as of the last day of the month:
- (a) 5 % of the institution's total assets;
- (b) EUR 50 million.
Where both conditions set out in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 are met, institutions may calculate the own funds requirement for their trading-book business as follows:
- (a) for the contracts listed in Annex II, point 1, contracts relating to equities which are referred to in point 3 of that Annex and credit derivatives, institutions may exempt those positions from the own funds requirement referred to in Article 92(4), point (b), and Article 92(5), point (b);
- (b) for trading book positions other than those referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, institutions may replace the own funds requirement referred to in Article 92(4), point (b), and Article 92(5), point (b), with the requirement calculated in accordance with Article 92(4), point (a), and Article 92(5), point (a).
Institutions shall calculate the size of their on- and off-balance-sheet trading book business on the basis of data as of the last day of each month for the purposes of paragraph 1 in accordance with the following requirements:
- (a) all the positions assigned to the trading book in accordance with Article 104 shall be included in the calculation except for the following:
- (i) positions concerning foreign exchange and commodities;
- (ii) positions in credit derivatives that are recognised as internal hedges against non-trading book credit risk exposures or counterparty risk exposures and the credit derivate transactions that perfectly offset the market risk of those internal hedges as referred to in Article 106(3);
- (b) all positions included in the calculation in accordance with point (a) shall be valued at their market value on that given date; where the market value of a position is not available on a given date, institutions shall take a fair value for the position on that date; where the market value and fair value of a position are not available on a given date, institutions shall take the most recent of the market value or fair value for that position;
- (c) the absolute value of the aggregated long position shall be summed with the absolute value of the aggregated short position.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, a long position is one where the market value of the position increases when the value of its main risk driver increases, and a short position is one where the market value of the position decreases when the value of its main risk driver increases.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the value of the aggregated long (short) position shall be equal to the sum of the values of the individual long (short) positions included in the calculation in accordance with point (a).
Where both conditions set out in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article are met, irrespective of the obligations set out in Articles 74 and 83 of Directive 2013/36/EU, Article 102(3) and (4), Articles 103 and 104b of this Regulation shall not apply.
Institutions shall notify the competent authorities when they calculate, or cease to calculate, the own funds requirements of their trading-book business in accordance with paragraph 2.
An institution that no longer meets one or more of the conditions set out in paragraph 1 shall immediately notify the competent authority thereof.
An institution shall cease to calculate the own funds requirements of its trading-book business in accordance with paragraph 2 within three months of one of the following occurring:
- (a) the institution does not meet the conditions set out in point (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 for three consecutive months;
- (b) the institution does not meet the conditions set out in point (a) or (b) of paragraph 1 during more than 6 out of the last 12 months.
Where an institution has ceased to calculate the own funds requirements of its trading-book business in accordance with this Article, it shall only be permitted to calculate the own funds requirements of its trading-book business in accordance with this Article where it demonstrates to the competent authority that all the conditions set out in paragraph 1 have been met for an uninterrupted full-year period.
Institutions shall not enter into, buy or sell a trading-book position for the sole purpose of complying with any of the conditions set out in paragraph 1 during the monthly assessment.
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the method for identifying the main risk driver of a position and for determining whether a transaction represents a long or a short position as referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, and Articles 273a(3) and 325a(2).
In developing those draft regulatory technical standards, EBA shall take into consideration the method developed for the regulatory technical standards mandated in accordance with Article 279a(3), point (b).
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 10 July 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Section 2 Own funds requirements for investment firms with limited authorisation to provide investment services
CHAPTER 3 Trading book
Article 102
Requirements for the trading book
Positions in the trading book shall be either free of restrictions on their tradability or able to be hedged.
Trading intent shall be evidenced on the basis of the strategies, policies and procedures set up by the institution to manage the position or portfolio in accordance with Articles 103, 104 and 104a.
Institutions shall establish and maintain systems and controls to manage their trading book in accordance with Article 103.
For the purpose of calculating the own funds requirements for market risk in accordance with the approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (b), trading book positions shall be assigned to trading desks.
Positions in the trading book shall be subject to the requirements for prudent valuation specified in Article 105.
Institutions shall treat internal hedges in accordance with Article 106.
Article 103
Management of the trading book
Institutions shall have in place clearly defined policies and procedures for the overall management of the trading book. Those policies and procedures shall at least address:
- (a) the activities which the institution considers to be trading business and as constituting part of the trading book for own funds requirement purposes;
- (b) the extent to which a position can be marked-to-market daily by reference to an active, liquid two-way market;
- (c) for positions that are marked-to-model, the extent to which the institution can:
- (i) identify all material risks of the position;
- (ii) hedge all material risks of the position with instruments for which an active, liquid two-way market exists;
- (iii) derive reliable estimates for the key assumptions and parameters used in the model;
- (d) the extent to which the institution can, and is required to, generate valuations for the position that can be validated externally in a consistent manner;
- (e) the extent to which legal restrictions or other operational requirements would impede the institution's ability to effect a liquidation or hedge of the position in the short term;
- (f) the extent to which the institution can, and is required to, actively manage the risks of positions within its trading operation;
- (g) the extent to which the institution may reclassify risk or positions between the non-trading and trading books and the requirements for such reclassifications as referred to in Article 104a.
In managing its positions or portfolios of positions in the trading book, the institution shall comply with all the following requirements:
- (a) the institution shall have in place a clearly documented trading strategy for the position or portfolios in the trading book, which shall be approved by senior management and include the expected holding period;
- (b) the institution shall have in place clearly defined policies and procedures for the active management of positions or portfolios in the trading book; those policies and procedures shall include the following:
- (i) which positions or portfolios of positions may be entered into by each trading desk or, as the case may be, by designated dealers;
- (ii) the setting of position limits and monitoring them for appropriateness;
- (iii) ensuring that dealers have the autonomy to enter into and manage the position within agreed limits and according to the approved strategy;
- (iv) ensuring that positions are reported to senior management as an integral part of the institution's risk management process;
- (v) ensuring that positions are actively monitored with reference to market information sources and an assessment is made of the marketability or hedgeability of the position or its component risks, including the assessment, the quality and availability of market inputs to the valuation process, level of market turnover, sizes of positions traded in the market;
- (vi) active anti-fraud procedures and controls;
- (c) the institution shall have in place clearly defined policies and procedures to monitor the positions against the institution's trading strategy, including the monitoring of turnover and positions for which the originally intended holding period has been exceeded.
Article 104
Inclusion in the trading book
An institution shall have in place clearly defined policies and procedures for determining which positions to include in the trading book to calculate its own funds requirements, in accordance with Article 102 and this Article, taking into account its risk management capabilities and practices. An institution shall fully document its compliance with those policies and procedures, shall subject them to an internal audit on at least a yearly basis and shall make the results of that audit available to the competent authorities.
An institution shall have in place an independent risk control function which shall evaluate, on an ongoing basis, whether its instruments are being properly assigned to the trading book or the non-trading book.
Institutions shall assign positions in the following instruments to the trading book:
- (a) instruments that meet the criteria set out in Article 325(6), (7) and (8), for the inclusion in the alternative correlation trading portfolio (ACTP);
- (b) instruments that would give rise to a net short credit or net short equity position in the non-trading book, with the exception of the own liabilities of the institution, unless such positions meet the criteria referred to in point (e);
- (c) instruments resulting from securities underwriting commitments, where those underwriting commitments relate only to securities that are expected to be purchased by the institution on the settlement date;
- (d) instruments classified unambiguously as having a trading purpose under the accounting framework applicable to the institution;
- (e) instruments resulting from market-making activities;
- (f) positions held with trading intent in CIUs, provided that those CIUs meet at least one of the conditions set out in paragraph 8;
- (g) listed equities;
- (h) trading-related securities financing transactions;
- (i) options, or other derivatives, embedded in the own liabilities of the institution in the non-trading book that relate to credit risk or equity risk.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (b), an institution shall have a net short equity position where a decrease in the equity’s price results in a profit for the institution. An institution shall have a net short credit position where the credit spread increase, or the deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer or group of issuers, results in a profit for the institution. Institutions shall continuously monitor whether instruments give rise to a net short credit or net short equity position in the non-trading book.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (i), an institution shall split the embedded option, or other derivative, from its own liability in the non-trading book that relates to credit risk or equity risk. It shall assign the embedded option, or other derivative, to the trading book and shall leave the own liability in the non-trading book. Where, due to its nature, it is not possible to split the instrument, an institution shall assign the whole instrument to the trading book. In such a case, it shall duly document the reason for applying that treatment.
Institutions shall not assign positions in the following instruments to the trading book:
- (a) instruments designated for securitisation warehousing;
- (b) real estate holdings-related instruments;
- (c) unlisted equities;
- (d) instruments related to retail and SME credit;
- (e) positions in other CIUs than those referred to in paragraph 2, point (f);
- (f) derivative contracts and CIUs with one or more of the underlying instruments referred to in points (a) to (d) of this paragraph;
- (g) instruments held for hedging a particular risk of one or more positions in an instrument referred to in points (a) to (f), (h) and (i) of this paragraph;
- (h) own liabilities of the institution, unless such instruments meet the criteria referred to in paragraph 2, point (e), or the criteria referred to in paragraph 2, third subparagraph;
- (i) instruments in hedge funds.
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, an institution may assign to the non-trading book a position in an instrument referred to in points (d) to (i) of that paragraph, subject to the approval of its competent authority. The competent authority shall give its approval where the institution has demonstrated to the satisfaction of its competent authority that the position is not held with trading intent or does not hedge positions held with trading intent.
By way of derogation from paragraph 3, an institution may assign to the trading book a position in an instrument referred to in point (i) of that paragraph, subject to the approval of its competent authority. The competent authority shall give its approval where the institution has demonstrated to the satisfaction of its competent authority that the position is held with trading intent, or hedges positions held with trading intent, and that the institution meets at least one of the conditions set out in paragraph 8 for that position.
Where an institution has assigned to the trading book a position in an instrument other than the instruments referred to in paragraph 2, point (a), (b) or (c), the institution’s competent authority may ask the institution to provide evidence to justify such assignment. Where the institution fails to provide suitable evidence, its competent authority may require the institution to reassign that position to the non-trading book.
Where an institution has assigned to the non-trading book a position in an instrument other than the instruments referred to in paragraph 3, the institution’s competent authority may ask the institution to provide evidence to justify such assignment. Where the institution fails to provide suitable evidence, its competent authority may require the institution to reassign that position to the trading book.
An institution shall assign to the trading book a position in a CIU, other than the positions referred to in paragraph 3, point (f), that is held with trading intent, where the institution meets any of the following conditions:
- (a) the institution is able to obtain sufficient information about the individual underlying exposures of the CIU;
- (b) the institution is not able to obtain sufficient information about the individual underlying exposures of the CIU, but the institution has knowledge of the content of the mandate of the CIU and is able to obtain daily price quotes for the CIU.
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to further specify the process that institutions are to use to calculate and monitor net short credit or net short equity positions in the non-trading book referred to in the paragraph 2, point (b).
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 10 July 2027.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Article 104a
Reclassification of a position
Institutions shall have in place clearly defined policies for identifying the exceptional circumstances which justify the reclassification of a trading book position as a non-trading book position or, conversely, the reclassification of a non-trading book position as a trading book position, for the purpose of determining their own funds requirements to the satisfaction of the competent authorities. The institutions shall review those policies at least annually.
EBA shall monitor the range of supervisory practices and shall issue by 10 July 2027 guidelines, in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, on what exceptional circumstances entail for the purposes of the first subparagraph of this paragraph and of paragraph 5 of this Article. Until EBA issues those guidelines, competent authorities shall notify EBA of, and shall provide a rationale for, their decisions on whether or not to permit an institution to reclassify a position as referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article.
Competent authorities shall grant permission to reclassify a trading book position as a non-trading book position or conversely a non-trading book position as a trading book position for the purpose of determining their own funds requirements only where the institution has provided the competent authorities with written evidence that its decision to reclassify that position is the result of an exceptional circumstance that is consistent with the policies the institution has in place in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article. For that purpose, the institution shall provide sufficient evidence that the position no longer meets the condition to be classified as a trading book or non-trading book position pursuant to Article 104.
The decision referred to in the first subparagraph shall be approved by the management body.
Where the competent authority has granted permission for the reclassification of a position in accordance with paragraph 2, the institution which received that permission shall:
- (a) publicly disclose, without delay,
- (i) information that its position has been reclassified, and
- (ii) where the effect of that reclassification is a reduction in the institution's own funds requirements, the size of that reduction; and
- (b) where the effect of that reclassification is a reduction in the institution's own funds requirements, not recognise that effect until the position matures, unless the institution's competent authority permits it to recognise that effect at an earlier date.
The institution shall calculate the net change in the amount of its own funds requirements arising from the reclassification of the position as the difference between the own funds requirements immediately after the reclassification and the own funds requirements immediately before the reclassification, each calculated in accordance with Article 92. The calculation shall not take into account the effects of any factors other than the reclassification.
The reclassification of a position in accordance with this Article shall be irrevocable, except in the exceptional circumstances referred to in paragraph 1.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, an institution may reclassify a non-trading book position as a trading book position pursuant to Article 104(2), point (d), without seeking permission from its competent authority. In such a case, the requirements laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article shall continue to apply to the institution. The institution shall immediately notify its competent authority where such a reclassification has occurred.
Article 104b
Requirements for trading desk
For the purpose of calculating the own funds requirements for market risk in accordance with the approach referred to in Article 325(1), point (b), institutions shall establish trading desks and shall assign each of their trading book positions and their non-trading book positions referred to in paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Article to one of those trading desks. Trading book positions shall be attributed to the same trading desk only where those positions are in compliance with the agreed business strategy for that trading desk and are consistently managed and monitored in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.
Institutions' trading desks shall at all times meet all the following requirements:
- (a) each trading desk shall have a clear and distinctive business strategy and a risk management structure that is adequate for its business strategy;
- (b) each trading desk shall have a clear organisational structure; positions in a given trading desk shall be managed by designated dealers within the institution; each dealer shall have dedicated functions in the trading desk; each dealer shall be assigned to one trading desk only;
- (c) position limits shall be set within each trading desk according to the business strategy of that trading desk;
- (d) reports on the activities, profitability, risk management and regulatory requirements at the trading desk level shall be produced at least on a weekly basis and communicated to the management body on a regular basis;
- (e) each trading desk shall have a clear annual business plan including a well-defined remuneration policy on the basis of sound criteria used for performance measurement;
- (f) reports on maturing positions, intra-day trading limit breaches, daily trading limit breaches and actions taken by the institution to address those breaches, as well as assessments of market liquidity, shall be prepared for each trading desk on a monthly basis and made available to the competent authorities.
By way of derogation from point (b) of paragraph 2, an institution may assign a dealer to more than one trading desk, provided that the institution demonstrates to the satisfaction of its competent authority that the assignment has been made due to business or resource considerations and the assignment preserves the other qualitative requirements set out in this Article applicable to dealers and trading desks.
Institutions shall notify the competent authorities of the manner in which they comply with paragraph 2. Competent authorities may require an institution to change the structure or organisation of its trading desks to comply with this Article.
To calculate their own funds requirements for market risk, institutions shall assign each of their non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk to trading desks established in accordance with paragraph 1 that manage risks that are similar to the risks of those positions.
By way of derogation from paragraph 5, institutions may, when calculating their own funds requirements for market risk, establish one or more trading desks to which they assign exclusively non-trading book positions that are subject to foreign exchange risk or commodity risk. Those trading desks shall not be subject to the requirements set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3.
Article 104c
Treatment of foreign exchange risk hedges of capital ratios
An institution which has deliberately taken a risk position in order to hedge, at least partially, against adverse movements in foreign exchange rates on any of its capital ratios as referred to in Article 92(1), points (a), (b) and (c), may, subject to the permission of its competent authority, exclude that risk position from the own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk referred to in Article 325(1), provided that all of the following conditions are met:
- (a) the maximum amount of the risk position that is excluded from the own funds requirements for market risk is limited to the amount of the risk position that neutralises the sensitivity of any of the capital ratios to the adverse movements in foreign exchange rates;
- (b) the risk position is excluded from the own funds requirements for market risk for at least six months;
- (c) the institution has established an appropriate risk management framework for hedging the adverse movements in foreign exchange rates on any of its capital ratios, including a clear hedging strategy and governance structure;
- (d) the institution has provided to the competent authority a justification for excluding a risk position from the own funds requirements for market risk, the details of that risk position and the amount to be excluded.
Any exclusion of risk positions from the own funds requirements for market risk in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be applied consistently.
The competent authority shall approve any changes by the institution to the risk management framework referred to in paragraph 1, point (c), and to the details of the risk positions referred to in paragraph 1, point (d).
EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:
- (a) the risk positions that an institution can deliberately take in order to hedge, at least partially, against the adverse movements of foreign exchange rates on any of its capital ratios referred to in paragraph 1;
- (b) how to determine the maximum amount referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), of this Article and the manner in which an institution is to exclude that amount for each of the approaches referred to in Article 325(1);
- (c) the criteria to be met by an institution’s risk management framework referred to in paragraph 1, point (c), in order to be considered appropriate for the purposes of this Article.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 10 July 2026.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Article 105
Requirements for prudent valuation
All trading book positions and non-trading book positions measured at fair value shall be subject to the standards for prudent valuation specified in this Article. Institutions shall in particular ensure that the prudent valuation of their trading book positions achieves an appropriate degree of certainty having regard to the dynamic nature of trading book positions and non-trading book positions measured at fair value, the demands of prudential soundness and the mode of operation and purpose of capital requirements in respect of trading book positions and non-trading book positions measured at fair value.
Institutions shall establish and maintain systems and controls sufficient to provide prudent and reliable valuation estimates. Those systems and controls shall include at least the following elements:
- (a) documented policies and procedures for the process of valuation, including clearly defined responsibilities of the various areas involved in the determination of the valuation, sources of market information and review of their appropriateness, guidelines for the use of unobservable inputs reflecting the institution's assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the position, frequency of independent valuation, timing of closing prices, procedures for adjusting valuations, month end and ad-hoc verification procedures;
- (b) reporting lines for the department accountable for the valuation process that are clear and independent of the front office, which shall ultimately be to the management body.
Institutions shall revalue trading book positions at fair value at least on a daily basis. Changes in the value of those positions shall be reported in the profit and loss account of the institution.
Institutions shall mark their trading book positions and non-trading book positions measured at fair value to market whenever possible, including when applying the relevant capital treatment to those positions.
When marking to market, an institution shall use the more prudent side of bid and offer unless the institution can close out at mid market. Where institutions make use of this derogation, they shall every six months inform their competent authorities of the positions concerned and furnish evidence that they can close out at mid-market.
Where marking to market is not possible, institutions shall conservatively mark to model their positions and portfolios, including when calculating own funds requirements for positions in the trading book and positions measured at fair value in the non-trading book.
Institutions shall comply with the following requirements when marking to model:
- (a) senior management shall be aware of the elements of the trading book or of other fair-valued positions which are subject to mark to model and shall understand the materiality of the uncertainty thereby created in the reporting of the risk/performance of the business;
- (b) institutions shall source market inputs, where possible, in line with market prices, and shall assess the appropriateness of the market inputs of the particular position being valued and the parameters of the model on a frequent basis;
- (c) where available, institutions shall use valuation methodologies which are accepted market practice for particular financial instruments or commodities;
- (d) where the model is developed by the institution itself, it shall be based on appropriate assumptions, which have been assessed and challenged by suitably qualified parties independent of the development process;
- (e) institutions shall have in place formal change control procedures and shall hold a secure copy of the model and use it periodically to check valuations;
- (f) risk management shall be aware of the weaknesses of the models used and how best to reflect those in the valuation output; and
- (g) institutions' models shall be subject to periodic review to determine the accuracy of their performance, which shall include assessing the continued appropriateness of assumptions, analysis of profit and loss versus risk factors, and comparison of actual close out values to model outputs.
For the purposes of point (d) of the first subparagraph, the model shall be developed or approved independently of the trading desks and shall be independently tested, including validation of the mathematics, assumptions and software implementation.
Institutions shall perform independent price verification in addition to daily marking to market or marking to model. Verification of market prices and model inputs shall be performed by a person or unit independent from persons or units that benefit from the trading book, at least monthly, or more frequently depending on the nature of the market or trading activity. Where independent pricing sources are not available or pricing sources are more subjective, prudent measures such as valuation adjustments may be appropriate.
Institutions shall establish and maintain procedures for considering valuation adjustments.
Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published in the Official Journal of the European Union. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original to this format.
This text is published under EUR-Lex's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence.
EUR-Lex
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu — Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union). Reused under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Only EU legislation published in the printed Official Journal of the European Union is deemed authentic; consolidated texts are reproduced here for documentation purposes and have been reformatted to Markdown.