Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA
CHAPTER I ESTABLISHMENT, OBJECTIVES AND TASKS OF EUROJUST
Article 1
Establishment of the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation
The European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) is hereby established.
Eurojust as established by this Regulation shall replace and succeed Eurojust as established by Decision 2002/187/JHA.
Eurojust shall have legal personality.
Article 2
Tasks
Eurojust shall support and strengthen coordination and cooperation between national investigating and prosecuting authorities in relation to serious crime which Eurojust is competent to deal with in accordance with Article 3(1) and (3), where that crime affects two or more Member States, or requires prosecution on common bases, on the basis of operations conducted and information supplied by the Member States’ authorities, by Europol, by the EPPO and by OLAF.
In carrying out its tasks, Eurojust shall:
- (a) take into account any request emanating from a competent authority of a Member State, any information provided by Union authorities, institutions, bodies, offices and agencies competent by virtue of provisions adopted within the framework of the Treaties and any information collected by Eurojust itself;
- (b) facilitate the execution of requests for, and decisions on, judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments that give effect to the principle of mutual recognition.
Eurojust shall carry out its tasks at the request of the competent authorities of the Member States, on its own initiative or at the request of the EPPO within the limits of the EPPO’s competence.
Article 3
Competence of Eurojust
Eurojust shall be competent with respect to the forms of serious crime listed in Annex I. However, as of the date on which the EPPO assumes its investigative and prosecutorial tasks in accordance with Article 120(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, Eurojust shall not exercise its competence with regard to crimes for which the EPPO exercises its competence, except in those cases where Member States which do not participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO are also involved and at the request of those Member States or at the request of the EPPO.
Eurojust shall exercise its competence for crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union in cases involving Member States which participate in enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO but in respect of which the EPPO does not have competence or decides not to exercise its competence.
Eurojust, the EPPO and the Member States concerned shall consult and cooperate with each other to facilitate Eurojust’s exercise of competence under this paragraph. The practical details of its exercise of competence under this paragraph shall be governed by a working arrangement as referred to in Article 47(3).
As regards forms of crime other than those listed in Annex I, Eurojust may also, in accordance with its tasks, assist with investigations and prosecutions where requested by a competent authority of a Member State.
Eurojust’s competence shall cover criminal offences related to the criminal offences listed in Annex I. The following categories of offences shall be regarded as related criminal offences:
- (a) criminal offences committed in order to procure the means of committing the serious crimes listed in Annex I;
- (b) criminal offences committed in order to facilitate or commit the serious crimes listed in Annex I;
- (c) criminal offences committed in order to ensure the impunity of those committing the serious crimes listed in Annex I.
Eurojust may also assist with investigations and prosecutions that only affect a Member State and a third country or a Member State and an international organisation, provided that a cooperation agreement or arrangement establishing cooperation pursuant to Article 52 has been concluded with that third country or that international organisation, or provided that in a specific case there is an essential interest in providing such assistance.
The decision as to whether and how Member States provide judicial assistance to a third country or to an international organisation shall remain solely with the competent authority of the Member State concerned, subject to applicable national, Union or international law.
At the request of either the competent authority of a Member State or the Commission, Eurojust may assist in investigations and prosecutions that only affect that Member State but which have repercussions at Union level. Before acting at the request of the Commission, Eurojust shall consult the competent authority of the Member State concerned. That competent authority may, within a deadline set by Eurojust, oppose the execution of the request by Eurojust, justifying its position in every case.
Article 4
Operational functions of Eurojust
Eurojust shall:
- (a) inform the competent authorities of the Member States of investigations and prosecutions of which it has been informed which have repercussions at Union level or which might affect Member States other than those directly concerned;
- (b) assist the competent authorities of the Member States in ensuring the best possible coordination of investigations and prosecutions;
- (c) assist in improving cooperation between the competent authorities of the Member States, in particular on the basis of Europol’s analyses;
- (d) cooperate and consult with the European Judicial Network in criminal matters, including by making use of and contributing to the improvement of the documentary database of the European Judicial Network;
- (e) cooperate closely with the EPPO on matters relating to its competence;
- (f) provide operational, technical and financial support to Member States’ cross-border operations and investigations, including to joint investigation teams;
- (g) support, and where appropriate participate in, the Union centres of specialised expertise developed by Europol and other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies;
- (h) cooperate with Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, as well as networks established in the area of freedom, security and justice regulated under Title V of the TFEU;
- (i) support Member States’ action in combating forms of serious crime listed in Annex I;
- (j) support Member States’ action in combating genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and related criminal offences, including by preserving, analysing and storing evidence related to those crimes and related criminal offences and enabling the exchange of such evidence with, or otherwise making it directly available to, competent national authorities and international judicial authorities, in particular the International Criminal Court.
In carrying out its tasks, Eurojust may ask the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, giving its reasons, to:
- (a) undertake an investigation or prosecution of specific acts;
- (b) accept that one of them may be in a better position to undertake an investigation or to prosecute specific acts;
- (c) coordinate between the competent authorities of the Member States concerned;
- (d) set up a joint investigation team in accordance with the relevant cooperation instruments;
- (e) provide it with any information that is necessary for carrying out its tasks;
- (f) take special investigative measures;
- (g) take any other measure justified for the investigation or prosecution.
Eurojust may also:
- (a) provide Europol with opinions based on analyses carried out by Europol;
- (b) supply logistical support, including translation, interpretation and the organisation of coordination meetings.
Where two or more Member States cannot agree as to which of them should undertake an investigation or prosecution following a request under points (a) or (b) of paragraph 2, Eurojust shall issue a written opinion on the case. Eurojust shall send the opinion to the Member States concerned immediately.
At the request of a competent authority, or on its own initiative, Eurojust shall issue a written opinion on recurrent refusals or difficulties concerning the execution of requests for, and decisions on, judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments giving effect to the principle of mutual recognition, provided that it is not possible to resolve such cases through mutual agreement between the competent national authorities or through the involvement of the national members concerned. Eurojust shall send the opinion to the Member States concerned immediately.
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall respond to requests from Eurojust under paragraph 2 and to the written opinions referred to in paragraph 4 or 5 without undue delay. The competent authorities of the Member States may refuse to comply with such requests or to follow the written opinion if doing so would harm essential national security interests, would jeopardise the success of an ongoing investigation or would jeopardise the safety of an individual.
Article 5
Exercise of operational and other functions
Eurojust shall act through one or more of the national members concerned when taking any of the actions referred to in Article 4(1) or (2). Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, the College shall focus on operational issues and any other issues that are directly linked to operational matters. The College shall only be involved in administrative matters to the extent necessary to ensure that its operational functions are fulfilled.
Eurojust shall act as a College:
- (a) when taking any of the actions referred to in Article 4(1) or (2):
- (i) at the request of one or more of the national members concerned by a case dealt with by Eurojust;
- (ii) where the case involves investigations or prosecutions which have repercussions at Union level or which might affect Member States other than those directly concerned;
- (b) when taking any of the actions referred to in Article 4(3), (4) or (5);
- (c) where a general question relating to the achievement of its operational objectives is involved;
- (d) when adopting Eurojust’s annual budget, in which case the decision shall be taken by a majority of two thirds of its members;
- (e) when adopting the programming document referred to in Article 15 or the annual report on Eurojust’s activities, in which cases the decision shall be taken by a majority of two thirds of its members;
- (f) when electing or dismissing the President and Vice-Presidents under Article 11;
- (g) when appointing the Administrative Director or, where relevant, extending his or her term of office or removing him or her from office under Article 17;
- (h) when adopting working arrangements under Articles 47(3) and 52;
- (i) when adopting rules for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in respect of its members, including in relation to their declaration of interests;
- (j) when adopting reports, policy papers, guidelines for the benefit of national authorities and opinions pertaining to the operational work of Eurojust, whenever those documents are of a strategic nature;
- (k) when appointing liaison magistrates in accordance with Article 53;
- (l) when taking any decision which is not expressly attributed to the Executive Board by this Regulation or which is not under the responsibility of the Administrative Director in accordance with Article 18;
- (m) when otherwise provided for in this Regulation.
When it fulfils its tasks, Eurojust shall indicate whether it is acting through one or more of the national members or as a College.
The College may assign additional administrative tasks to the Administrative Director and the Executive Board beyond those provided for in Articles 16 and 18, in accordance with its operational needs.
Where exceptional circumstances so require, the College may decide to suspend temporarily the delegation of the appointing authority powers to the Administrative Director and of those powers that have been sub-delegated by the latter, and to exercise them itself or to delegate them to one of its members or to a staff member other than the Administrative Director.
The College shall adopt Eurojust’s rules of procedure on the basis of a two-thirds majority of its members. In the event that agreement cannot be reached by a two-thirds majority, the decision shall be taken by simple majority. Eurojust’s rules of procedure shall be approved by the Council by means of implementing acts.
CHAPTER II STRUCTURE AND ORGANISATION OF EUROJUST
SECTION I Structure
Article 6
Structure of Eurojust
Eurojust shall comprise:
- (a) the national members;
- (b) the College;
- (c) the Executive Board;
- (d) the Administrative Director.
SECTION II National members
Article 7
Status of national members
Eurojust shall have one national member seconded by each Member State in accordance with its legal system. That national member shall have his or her regular place of work at the seat of Eurojust.
Each national member shall be assisted by one deputy and by one Assistant. In principle, the deputy and the Assistant shall have their regular place of work at the seat of Eurojust. Each Member State may decide that the deputy or Assistant or both will have their regular place of work in their Member State. If a Member State takes such a decision, it shall notify the College. If the operational needs of Eurojust so require, the College may request the Member State to assign the deputy or Assistant or both to work at the seat of Eurojust for a specified period. The Member State shall comply with such a request from the College without undue delay.
Additional deputies or Assistants may assist the national member and, if necessary and with the agreement of the College, may have their regular place of work at Eurojust. Member States shall notify Eurojust and the Commission of the appointment of national members, deputies and Assistants.
National members and deputies shall have the status of a prosecutor, a judge or a representative of a judicial authority with competences equivalent to those of a prosecutor or judge under their national law. The Member States shall grant them at least the powers referred to in this Regulation in order to be able to fulfil their tasks.
The terms of office of the national members and their deputies shall be five years, renewable once. In cases where a deputy is unable to act on behalf of a national member or is unable to substitute for a national member, the national member shall remain in office upon expiry of his or her term of office until the renewal of his or her term or his or her replacement, subject to the consent of their Member State.
Member States shall appoint national members and deputies on the basis of a proven high level of relevant, practical experience in the field of criminal justice.
The deputy shall be able to act on behalf of or to substitute for the national member. An Assistant may also act on behalf of or substitute for the national member if he or she has a status referred to in paragraph 4.
Operational information exchange between Eurojust and Member States shall take place through the national members.
The salaries and emoluments of the national members, deputies and Assistants shall be borne by their Member State without prejudice to Article 12.
Where national members, deputies and Assistants act within the framework of Eurojust’s tasks, the relevant expenditure related to those activities shall be regarded as operational expenditure.
Article 8
Powers of national members
The national members shall have the power to:
- (a) facilitate or otherwise support the issuing or execution of any request for mutual legal assistance or mutual recognition;
- (b) directly contact and exchange information with any competent national authority of the Member State or any other competent Union body, office or agency, including the EPPO;
- (c) directly contact and exchange information with any competent international authority, in accordance with the international commitments of their Member State;
- (d) participate in joint investigation teams including in setting them up.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, Member States may grant additional powers to national members in accordance with their national law. Those Member States shall notify the Commission and the College of these powers.
With the agreement of the competent national authority, national members may, in accordance with their national law:
- (a) issue or execute any request for mutual legal assistance or mutual recognition;
- (b) order, request or execute investigative measures, as provided for in Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ([^E0001]).
In urgent cases where it is not possible to identify or to contact the competent national authority in a timely manner, national members shall be competent to take the measures referred to in paragraph 3 in accordance with their national law, provided that they inform the competent national authority as soon as possible.
The national member may submit a proposal to the competent national authority to carry out the measures referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 where the exercise of the powers referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 by that national member would be in conflict with:
- (a) a Member State’s constitutional rules; or
- (b) fundamental aspects of that Member State’s national criminal justice system regarding:
- (i) the division of powers between the police, prosecutors and judges;
- (ii) the functional division of tasks between prosecution authorities; or
- (iii) the federal structure of the Member State concerned.
Member States shall ensure that, in cases referred to in paragraph 5, the proposal submitted by their national member is handled without undue delay by the competent national authority.
Article 9
Access to national registers
National members shall have access to, or at least be able to obtain the information contained in, the following types of registers of their Member State, in accordance with their national law:
- (a) criminal records;
- (b) registers of arrested persons;
- (c) investigation registers;
- (d) DNA registers;
- (e) other registers of public authorities of their Member State where such information is necessary to fulfil their tasks.
SECTION III The College
Article 10
Composition of the College
The College shall be composed of:
- (a) all the national members; and
- (b) one representative of the Commission when the College exercises its management functions.
The representative of the Commission nominated under point (b) of the first subparagraph should be the same person as the Commission’s representative on the Executive Board under Article 16(4).
The Administrative Director shall attend the management meetings of the College, without the right to vote.
The College may invite any person whose opinion may be of interest to attend its meetings as an observer.
The members of the College may, subject to the provisions of Eurojust’s rules of procedure, be assisted by advisers or experts.
Article 11
The President and Vice-President of Eurojust
The College shall elect a President and two Vice-Presidents from among the national members by a two-thirds majority of its members. In the event that a two-thirds majority cannot be reached after the second round of election, the Vice-Presidents shall be elected by a simple majority of the members of the College, while a two-thirds majority shall continue to be necessary for the election of the President.
The President shall exercise his or her functions on behalf of the College. The President shall:
- (a) represent Eurojust;
- (b) call and preside over the meetings of the College and the Executive Board and keep the College informed of any matters that are of interest to it;
- (c) direct the work of the College and monitor Eurojust’s daily management by the Administrative Director;
- (d) exercise any other functions set out in Eurojust’s rules of procedure.
The Vice-Presidents shall exercise the functions set out in paragraph 2 which the President entrusts to them. They shall replace the President if he or she is prevented from attending to his or her duties. The President and Vice-Presidents shall be assisted in the performance of their specific duties by the administrative staff of Eurojust.
The term of office of the President and the Vice-Presidents shall be four years. They may be re-elected once.
When a national member is elected President or Vice-President of Eurojust, his or her term of office shall be extended to ensure that he or she can fulfil his or her function as President or Vice-President.
If the President or Vice-President no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his or her duties, he or she may be dismissed by the College acting on a proposal from one third of its members. The decision shall be adopted on the basis of a two-thirds majority of the members of the College, excluding the President or Vice-President concerned.
When a national member is elected President of Eurojust, the Member State concerned may second another suitably qualified person to reinforce the national desk for the duration of the former’s mandate as President.
A Member State which decides to second such a person shall be entitled to apply for compensation in accordance with Article 12.
Article 12
Compensation mechanism for the election to the position of President
By 12 December 2019, the Council shall, acting on a proposal by the Commission and by means of implementing acts, determine a mechanism for compensation, for the purpose of Article 11(7), to be made available to Member States whose national member is elected President.
The compensation shall be available to any Member State if:
- (a) its national member has been elected President; and
- (b) it requests compensation from the College and provides justification for the need to reinforce its national desk on grounds of an increased workload.
The compensation provided shall equate to 50 % of the national salary of the seconded person. Compensation for living costs and other associated expenses shall be provided on a comparable basis to that provided to Union officials or other servants seconded abroad.
The costs of the compensation mechanism shall be borne by Eurojust’s budget.
Article 13
Meetings of the College
The President shall convene the meetings of the College.
The College shall hold at least one meeting per month. In addition, it shall meet on the initiative of the President, at the request of the Commission to discuss the administrative tasks of the College, or at the request of at least one third of its members.
Eurojust shall send the EPPO the agenda of College meetings whenever issues are discussed which are of relevance for the exercise of the tasks of the EPPO. Eurojust shall invite the EPPO to participate in such meetings, without the right to vote. When the EPPO is invited to a College meeting, Eurojust shall provide it with the relevant documents supporting the agenda.
Article 14
Voting rules of the College
Unless stated otherwise, and where a consensus cannot be reached, the College shall take its decisions by a majority of its members.
Each member shall have one vote. In the absence of a voting member, the deputy shall be entitled to exercise the right to vote subject to the conditions set out in Article 7(7). In the absence of the deputy, the Assistant shall also be entitled to exercise the right to vote subject to the conditions set out in Article 7(7).
Article 15
Annual and multi-annual programming
By 30 November each year, the College shall adopt a programming document containing annual and multi-annual programming, based on a draft prepared by the Administrative Director, taking into account the opinion of the Commission. The College shall forward the programming document to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the EPPO. The programming document shall become definitive after final adoption of the general budget of the Union and shall be adjusted accordingly, if necessary.
The annual work programme shall comprise detailed objectives and expected results including performance indicators. It shall also contain a description of the actions to be financed and an indication of the financial and human resources allocated to each action, in accordance with the principles of activity-based budgeting and management. The annual work programme shall be coherent with the multi-annual work programme referred to in paragraph 4. It shall clearly indicate which tasks have been added, changed or deleted in comparison with the previous financial year.
The College shall amend the adopted annual work programme when a new task is given to Eurojust. Any substantial amendment to the annual work programme shall be adopted by the same procedure as the initial annual work programme. The College may delegate to the Administrative Director the power to make non-substantial amendments to the annual work programme.
The multi-annual work programme shall set out overall strategic programming including objectives, the strategy for cooperation with the authorities of third countries and international organisations referred to in Article 52, expected results and performance indicators. It shall also set out resource programming including multi-annual budget and staff. The resource programming shall be updated annually. The strategic programming shall be updated where appropriate, and in particular to address the outcome of the evaluation referred to in Article 69.
SECTION IV The executive board
Article 16
Functioning of the Executive Board
The College shall be assisted by an Executive Board. The Executive Board shall be responsible for taking administrative decisions to ensure the proper functioning of Eurojust. It shall oversee the necessary preparatory work of the Administrative Director on other administrative matters for adoption by the College. It shall not be involved in the operational functions of Eurojust referred to in Articles 4 and 5.
The Executive Board may consult the College when carrying out its tasks.
The Executive Board shall also:
- (a) review Eurojust’s programming document referred to in Article 15 based on the draft prepared by the Administrative Director and forward it to the College for adoption;
- (b) adopt an anti-fraud strategy for Eurojust, proportionate to the fraud risks, taking into account the costs and benefits of the measures to be implemented and based on a draft prepared by the Administrative Director;
- (c) adopt appropriate implementing rules giving effect to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (the ‘Staff Regulations of Officials’) and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (‘Conditions of Employment of Other Servants’), laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 ([^E0002]) in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations of Officials;
- (d) ensure adequate follow-up to the findings and recommendations stemming from the internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the EDPS and OLAF;
- (e) take all decisions on the establishment and, where necessary, the modification of Eurojust’s internal administrative structures;
- (f) without prejudice to the responsibilities of the Administrative Director set out in Article 18, assist and advise him or her on the implementation of the decisions of the College, with a view to reinforcing supervision of administrative and budgetary management;
- (g) undertake any additional administrative tasks assigned to it by the College under Article 5(4);
- (h) adopt the financial rules applicable to Eurojust in accordance with Article 64;
- (i) adopt, in accordance with Article 110 of the Staff Regulations of Officials, a decision based on Article 2(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials and on Article 6 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants delegating the relevant appointing authority powers to the Administrative Director and establishing the conditions under which this delegation of powers can be suspended; the Administrative Director shall be authorised to sub-delegate those powers;
- (j) review Eurojust’s draft annual budget for adoption by the College;
- (k) review the draft annual report on Eurojust’s activities and forward it to the College for adoption;
- (l) appoint an accounting officer and a Data Protection Officer who are functionally independent in the performance of their duties.
The Executive Board shall be composed of the President and Vice-Presidents of Eurojust, one representative of the Commission and two other members of the College designated on a two-year rotation system in accordance with Eurojust’s rules of procedure. The Administrative Director shall attend the meetings of the Executive Board without the right to vote.
The President of Eurojust shall be the chairperson of the Executive Board. The Executive Board shall take its decisions by a majority of its members. Each member shall have one vote. In the event of a tied vote, the President of Eurojust shall have a casting vote.
The term of office of members of the Executive Board shall end when their term as national members, President or Vice-President ends.
The Executive Board shall meet at least once a month. In addition, it shall meet on the initiative of its chairperson or at the request of the Commission or of at least two of its other members.
Eurojust shall send to the EPPO the agenda of the Executive Board meetings and consult with the EPPO on the need to participate in those meetings. Eurojust shall invite the EPPO to participate, without the right to vote, whenever issues are discussed which are of relevance for the functioning of the EPPO.
When the EPPO is invited to an Executive Board meeting, Eurojust shall provide it with the relevant documents supporting the agenda.
SECTION V The Administrative Director
Article 17
Status of the Administrative Director
The Administrative Director shall be engaged as a temporary agent of Eurojust under point (a) of Article 2 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants.
The Administrative Director shall be appointed by the College from a list of candidates proposed by the Executive Board, following an open and transparent selection procedure in accordance with Eurojust’s rules of procedure. For the purpose of concluding the employment contract with the Administrative Director, Eurojust shall be represented by the President of Eurojust.
The term of office of the Administrative Director shall be four years. By the end of that period, the Executive Board shall undertake an assessment that takes into account an evaluation of the performance of the Administrative Director.
The College, acting on a proposal from the Executive Board that takes into account the assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend the term of office of the Administrative Director once and for no more than four years.
An Administrative Director whose term of office has been extended shall not participate in another selection procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period.
The Administrative Director shall be accountable to the College.
The Administrative Director may be removed from the office only pursuant to a decision of the College acting on a proposal from the Executive Board.
Article 18
Responsibilities of the Administrative Director
For administrative purposes, Eurojust shall be managed by its Administrative Director.
Without prejudice to the powers of the College or the Executive Board, the Administrative Director shall be independent in the performance of his or her duties and shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government or any other body.
The Administrative Director shall be the legal representative of Eurojust.
The Administrative Director shall be responsible for the implementation of the administrative tasks assigned to Eurojust, in particular:
- (a) the day-to-day administration of Eurojust and staff management;
- (b) implementing the decisions adopted by the College and the Executive Board;
- (c) preparing the programming document referred to in Article 15 and submitting it to the Executive Board for review;
- (d) implementing the programming document referred to in Article 15 and reporting to the Executive Board and College on its implementation;
- (e) preparing the annual report on Eurojust’s activities and presenting it to the Executive Board for review and to the College for adoption;
- (f) preparing an action plan following up on conclusions of internal or external audit reports, evaluations and investigations, including those of the EDPS and OLAF and reporting on progress twice a year to the College, to the Executive Board, to the Commission and to the EDPS;
- (g) preparing an anti-fraud strategy for Eurojust and presenting it to the Executive Board for adoption;
- (h) preparing draft financial rules applicable to Eurojust;
- (i) preparing Eurojust’s draft statement of estimates of revenue and expenditure and implementing its budget;
- (j) exercising, with respect to the staff of Eurojust, the powers conferred by the Staff Regulations of Officials on the appointing authority and by the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants on the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of other servants (‘the appointing authority powers’);
- (k) ensuring that the necessary administrative support is provided to facilitate the operational work of Eurojust;
- (l) ensuring that support is provided to the President and Vice-Presidents as they carry out their duties;
- (m) preparing a draft proposal for Eurojust’s annual budget, which shall be reviewed by the Executive Board before adoption by the College.
CHAPTER III OPERATIONAL MATTERS
Article 19
On-call coordination mechanism
In order to fulfil its tasks in urgent cases, Eurojust shall operate an on-call coordination mechanism (‘OCC’) able to receive and process at all times the requests referred to it. The OCC shall be contactable 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
The OCC shall rely on one OCC representative per Member State who may be either the national member, his or her deputy, an Assistant entitled to replace the national member, or a seconded national expert. The OCC representative shall be available to act 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
The OCC representatives shall act efficiently and without delay in relation to the execution of a request in their Member State.
Article 20
Eurojust national coordination system
Each Member State shall appoint one or more national correspondents for Eurojust.
All national correspondents appointed by the Member States under paragraph 1 shall have the skills and experience necessary for them to carry out their duties.
2a. Each Member State shall designate a competent national authority as Eurojust national correspondent for terrorism matters. That national correspondent for terrorism matters shall be a judicial or other competent authority. Where the national legal system so requires, it shall be possible for a Member State to designate more than one competent national authority as Eurojust national correspondent for terrorism matters. The national correspondent for terrorism matters shall have access to all relevant information in accordance with Article 21a(1). It shall be competent to collect such information and to send it to Eurojust, in compliance with national and Union law, in particular national criminal procedural law and applicable data protection rules.
Each Member State shall set up a Eurojust national coordination system to ensure coordination of the work carried out by:
- (a) the national correspondents for Eurojust;
- (b) any national correspondents for issues relating to the competence of the EPPO;
- (c) the national correspondent for Eurojust for terrorism matters;
- (d) the national correspondent for the European Judicial Network in criminal matters and up to three other contact points of the European Judicial Network;
- (e) national members or contact points of the Network for joint investigation teams, and national members or contact points of the networks set up by Decisions 2002/494/JHA, 2007/845/JHA and 2008/852/JHA;
- (f) where applicable, any other relevant judicial authority.
The persons referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3 shall retain their position and status under national law, without this having a significant impact on the performance of their duties under this Regulation.
The national correspondents for Eurojust shall be responsible for the functioning of their Eurojust national coordination system. Where several correspondents for Eurojust are appointed, one of them shall be responsible for the functioning of their Eurojust national coordination system.
The national members shall be informed of all meetings of their Eurojust national coordination system where casework-related matters are discussed. The national members may attend such meetings as necessary.
Each Eurojust national coordination system shall facilitate the carrying out of Eurojust’s tasks within the Member State concerned, in particular by:
- (a) ensuring that the case management system referred to in Article 23 receives information related to the Member State concerned in an efficient and reliable manner;
- (b) assisting in determining whether a request should be handled with the assistance of Eurojust or of the European Judicial Network;
- (c) assisting the national member in identifying relevant authorities for the execution of requests for, and decisions on, judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments giving effect to the principle of mutual recognition;
- (d) maintaining close relations with the Europol national unit, other contact points of the European Judicial Network and other relevant competent national authorities.
In order to meet the objectives referred to in paragraph 7 of this Article, the persons referred to in paragraph 3, points (a), (b) and (c), of this Article shall be connected to the case management system in accordance with this Article and with Articles 23, 24, 25 and 34. The cost of connection to the case management system shall be borne by the general budget of the Union.
The setting up of the Eurojust national coordination system and the appointment of national correspondents shall not prevent direct contacts between the national member and the competent authorities of his or her Member State.
Article 21
Exchanges of information with the Member States and between national members
The competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange with Eurojust all information necessary for the performance of its tasks under Articles 2 and 4 in accordance with the applicable data protection rules. This shall at least include the information referred to in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of this Article.
The transmission of information to Eurojust shall only be interpreted as a request for the assistance of Eurojust in the case concerned if so specified by a competent authority.
The national members shall exchange all information necessary for the performance of Eurojust’s tasks among themselves or with their competent national authorities, without prior authorisation. In particular, the competent national authorities shall promptly inform their national members of a case which concerns them.
The competent national authorities shall inform their national members of the setting up of joint investigation teams and of the results of the work of such teams.
The competent national authorities shall inform their national members without undue delay of any case affecting at least three Member States for which requests for or decisions on judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments giving effect to the principle of mutual recognition, have been transmitted to at least two Member States, where one or more of the following apply:
- (a) the offence involved is punishable in the requesting or issuing Member State by a custodial sentence or a detention order, the maximum period of which is at least five or six years, to be decided by the Member State concerned, and is included in the following list:
- (i) trafficking in human beings;
- (ii) sexual abuse or sexual exploitation including child pornography and solicitation of children for sexual purposes;
- (iii) drug trafficking;
- (iv) illicit trafficking in firearms, their parts or components or ammunition or explosives;
- (v) corruption;
- (vi) crime against the financial interests of the Union;
- (vii) forgery of money or means of payment;
- (viii) money laundering activities;
- (ix) computer crime;
- (b) there are factual indications that a criminal organisation is involved;
- (c) there are indications that the case may have a serious cross-border dimension or may have repercussions at Union level, or that it may affect Member States other than those directly involved.
The competent national authorities shall inform their national members of:
- (a) cases in which conflicts of jurisdiction have arisen or are likely to arise;
- (b) controlled deliveries affecting at least three countries, at least two of which are Member States;
- (c) repeated difficulties or refusals regarding the execution of requests for, or decisions on, judicial cooperation, including requests and decisions based on instruments giving effect to the principle of mutual recognition.
The competent national authorities shall not be obliged to supply information in a particular case if doing so would harm essential national security interests or jeopardise the safety of individuals.
This Article is without prejudice to conditions set out in bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements between Member States and third countries, including any conditions set by third countries concerning the use of information once supplied.
This Article shall not affect other obligations regarding the transmission of information to Eurojust.
The competent national authorities shall not be obliged to provide information as referred to in this Article where such information has already been transmitted to Eurojust in accordance with other provisions of this Regulation.
Article 21a
Exchange of information on terrorism cases
As regards terrorist offences, the competent national authorities shall inform their national members of any ongoing or concluded criminal investigations supervised by judicial authorities as soon as the case is referred to the judicial authorities in accordance with national law, in particular national criminal procedural law, of any ongoing or concluded prosecutions and court proceedings, and of any court decisions on terrorist offences. That obligation shall apply to all criminal investigations related to terrorist offences regardless of whether there is a known link to another Member State or a third country unless the criminal investigation, due to its specific circumstances, clearly affects only one Member State.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply where:
- (a) the sharing of information would jeopardise an ongoing investigation or the safety of an individual; or
- (b) the sharing of information would be contrary to essential security interests of the Member State concerned.
Terrorist offences for the purpose of this Article are offences referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([^E0003]).
The information transmitted in accordance with paragraph 1 shall include the operational personal data and non-personal data set out in Annex III. Such information may include personal data in accordance with Annex III, point (d), but only if such personal data are held by or can be communicated to the competent national authorities in accordance with national law and if the transmission of those data is necessary to identify reliably a data subject under Article 27(5).
Subject to paragraph 2, the competent national authorities shall inform their national members about any changes to the information transmitted under paragraph 1 without undue delay and, where possible, no later than 10 working days after such changes.
The competent national authority shall not be obliged to provide such information where it has already been transmitted to Eurojust.
The national competent authority may at any stage request the support of Eurojust in the follow-up action as regards links identified on the basis of information provided under this Article.
Article 22
Information provided by Eurojust to competent national authorities
Eurojust shall provide competent national authorities with information on the results of the processing of information, including the existence of links with cases already stored in the case management system, without undue delay. That information may include personal data.
Where a competent national authority requests that Eurojust provide it with information within a certain timeframe, Eurojust shall transmit that information within that timeframe.
Article 22a
Secure digital communication and data exchange between competent national authorities and Eurojust
Communication between the competent national authorities and Eurojust under this Regulation shall be carried out through the decentralised IT system. The case management system referred to in Article 23 shall be connected with a network of IT systems and interoperable e-CODEX access points, which operate under the individual responsibility and management of each Member State and Eurojust, enabling the secure and reliable cross-border exchange of information (‘the decentralised IT system’).
Where exchange of information in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible due to the unavailability of the decentralised IT system or due to exceptional circumstances, it shall be carried out by the swiftest, most appropriate alternative means. Member States and Eurojust shall ensure that the alternative means of communication are reliable and provide an equivalent level of security and data protection.
The competent national authorities shall transmit the information referred to in Articles 21 and 21a of this Regulation to Eurojust in a semi-automated and structured manner from national registers. The arrangements for such transmission shall be determined by the Commission, in consultation with Eurojust, in an implementing act, in accordance with Article 22b of this Regulation. In particular, that implementing act shall determine the format of the data transmitted pursuant to Annex III, point (d), to this Regulation and the necessary technical standards with regard to the transmission of such data, and shall set out the digital procedural standards as defined in Article 3, point 9, of Regulation (EU) 2022/850 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([^E0004]).
The Commission shall be responsible for the creation, maintenance and development of reference implementation software which Member States and Eurojust may choose to apply as their back-end system. That reference implementation software shall be based on a modular setup, meaning that the software is packaged and delivered separately from the e-CODEX components needed to connect it to the decentralised IT system. That setup shall enable Member States to reuse or enhance their existing national judicial communication infrastructures for the purpose of cross-border use and Eurojust to connect its case management system to the decentralised IT system.
The Commission shall provide, maintain and support the reference implementation software free of charge. The creation, maintenance and development of the reference implementation software shall be financed from the general budget of the Union.
Member States and Eurojust shall bear their respective costs for establishing and operating an authorised e-CODEX access point as defined in Article 3, point 3, of Regulation (EU) 2022/850, and for establishing and adjusting their relevant IT systems to make them interoperable with the access points.
Article 22b
Adoption of implementing acts by the Commission
The Commission shall adopt the implementing acts necessary for the establishment and use of the decentralised IT system for communication under this Regulation, setting out the following:
- (a) the technical specifications defining the methods of communication by electronic means for the purposes of the decentralised IT system;
- (b) the technical specifications for communication protocols;
- (c) the information security objectives and relevant technical measures ensuring minimum information security standards and a high level of cybersecurity standards for the processing and communication of information within the decentralised IT system;
- (d) the minimum availability objectives and possible related technical requirements for the services provided by the decentralised IT system;
- (e) the establishment of a steering committee comprising representatives of the Member States to ensure the operation and maintenance of the decentralised IT system in order to meet the objectives of this Regulation.
The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be adopted by 1 November 2025 in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 22c(2).
Article 22c
Committee Procedure
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council ([^E0005]).
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Where the committee delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and Article 5(4), third subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Article 23
Case management system
Eurojust shall establish a case management system for the processing of operational personal data listed in Annex II, data listed in Annex III and non-personal data.
The purposes of the case management system shall be to:
- (a) support the management and coordination of investigations and prosecutions for which Eurojust is providing assistance;
- (b) ensure secure access to and exchange of information on ongoing investigations and prosecutions;
- (c) allow for the cross-checking of information and identifying links;
- (d) allow for the extraction of data for operational and statistical purposes;
- (e) facilitate monitoring to ensure that the processing of operational personal data is lawful and complies with this Regulation and the applicable data protection rules.
The case management system may be linked to the secure telecommunications connection referred to in Article 9 of Council Decision 2008/976/JHA ([^E0006]) and other secure communication channels in accordance with applicable Union law.
Where Eurojust has been granted access to data in or from other Union information systems established under other Union legal acts, it may use the case management system to access data in or to connect to such information systems for the purpose of retrieving and processing information, including personal data, provided that it is necessary for the performance of its tasks and is in line with the Union legal acts establishing such information systems.
Paragraphs 3 and 4 do not extend the access rights granted to Eurojust to other Union information systems under the Union legal acts establishing those systems.
For the processing of operational personal data, Eurojust shall not establish any automated data file other than the case management system.
The national members may temporarily store and analyse personal data for the purpose of determining whether such data are relevant to Eurojust’s tasks and can be included in the case management system. Those data may be held for up to three months.
In the performance of their duties, national members may process personal data on the individual cases on which they are working, in accordance with this Regulation or other applicable instruments. They shall allow the Data Protection Officer to have access to the personal data processed in the case management system.
Article 24
Management of the information in the case management system
The national member shall store the information transmitted to that national member in accordance with this Regulation or other applicable instruments in the case management system.
The national member shall be responsible for the management of the data processed by that national member.
The national member shall decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether to keep access to the information restricted or to give access to it or to parts of it to other national members, to liaison prosecutors seconded to Eurojust, to authorised Eurojust staff or to any other person working on behalf of Eurojust who has received the necessary authorisation from the Administrative Director.
The national member shall indicate, in consultation with the competent national authorities, in general or specific terms, any restrictions on the further handling, access and transfer of the information if a link as referred to in Article 23(2), point (c), has been identified.
Article 25
Access to the case management system at national level
Persons referred to in Article 20(3), points (a), (b) and (c), shall have access to no more than the following data:
- (a) data controlled by the national member of their Member State;
- (b) data controlled by national members of other Member States and to which the national member of their Member State has received access, unless the national member who controls the data has denied such access.
The national member shall, within the limitations provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, decide on the extent to which access is granted to the persons referred to in Article 20(3), points (a), (b) and (c), in their Member State.
Data provided in accordance with Article 21a may be accessed at national level only by national correspondents for Eurojust in terrorism matters as referred to in Article 20(3), point (c).
Each Member State may decide, after consultation with its national member, that persons referred to in Article 20(3), points (a), (b) and (c), may, within the limitations provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, enter information in the case management system concerning their Member State. Such contribution shall be subject to validation by the respective national member. The College shall lay down the details of the practical implementation of this paragraph. Member States shall notify Eurojust and the Commission of their decision regarding the implementation of this paragraph. The Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof.
CHAPTER IV PROCESSING OF INFORMATION
Article 26
Processing of personal data by Eurojust
This Regulation and Article 3 and Chapter IX of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 shall apply to the processing of operational personal data by Eurojust. Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 shall apply to the processing of administrative personal data by Eurojust, with the exception of Chapter IX of that Regulation.
References to ‘applicable data protection rules’ in this Regulation shall be understood as references to the provisions on data protection set out in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
The data protection rules on processing of operational personal data contained in this Regulation shall be considered as specific data protection rules to the general rules laid down in Article 3 and Chapter IX of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Eurojust shall determine the time limits for the storage of administrative personal data in the data protection provisions of its rules of procedure.
Article 27
Processing of operational personal data
In so far as it is necessary to perform its tasks, Eurojust may, within the framework of its competence and in order to carry out its operational functions, process by automated means or in structured manual files in accordance with this Regulation only the operational personal data listed in point 1 of Annex II of persons who, under the national law of the Member States concerned, are persons with regard to whom there are serious grounds for believing that they have committed or are about to commit a criminal offence in respect of which Eurojust is competent or who have been convicted of such an offence.
Eurojust may process only the operational personal data listed in point 2 of Annex II of persons who, under the national law of the Member States concerned, are regarded as victims or other parties to a criminal offence, such as persons who might be called to testify in a criminal investigation or prosecution regarding one or more of the types of crime and the criminal offences referred to in Article 3, persons who are able to provide information on criminal offences, or contacts or associates of a person referred to in paragraph 1. The processing of such operational personal data may only take place if it is necessary for the fulfilment of the tasks of Eurojust, within the framework of its competence and in order to carry out its operational functions.
In exceptional cases, for a limited period of time which shall not exceed the time needed for the conclusion of the case in relation to which the data are processed, Eurojust may also process operational personal data other than the personal data referred to in Annex II relating to the circumstances of an offence, where such data are immediately relevant to and are included in ongoing investigations which Eurojust is coordinating or helping to coordinate and when their processing is necessary for the purposes specified in paragraph 1. The Data Protection Officer referred to in Article 36 shall be informed immediately when such operational personal data are processed, and shall be informed of the specific circumstances which justify the necessity of the processing of those operational personal data. Where such other data refer to witnesses or victims within the meaning of paragraph 2 of this Article, the decision to process them shall be taken jointly by the national members concerned.
Eurojust may process special categories of operational personal data in accordance with Article 76 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Where such other data refer to witnesses or victims within the meaning of paragraph 2 of this Article, the decision to process them shall be taken by the national members concerned.
Where operational personal data are transmitted in accordance with Article 21a, Eurojust may process the operational personal data listed in Annex III of the following persons:
- (a) persons for whom, in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned, there are serious grounds for believing that they have committed or are about to commit a criminal offence in respect of which Eurojust is competent;
- (b) persons who have been convicted of such offence. Unless the competent national authority decides otherwise on a case-by-case basis, Eurojust may continue to process the operational personal data referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph also after the proceedings have been concluded under the national law of the Member State concerned, even in the event of an acquittal or of a final decision not to prosecute. Where the proceedings did not result in a conviction, processing of operational personal data shall take place only in order to identify links between ongoing, future or concluded investigations and prosecutions as referred to in Article 23(2), point (c).
Article 28
Processing under the authority of Eurojust or processor
The processor and any person acting under the authority of Eurojust or of the processor who has access to operational personal data shall not process those data except on instructions from Eurojust, unless required to do so by Union law or Member State law.
Article 29
Time limits for the storage of operational personal data
Operational personal data processed by Eurojust shall be stored by Eurojust for only as long as is necessary for the performance of its tasks. In particular, without prejudice to paragraph 3 of this Article, the operational personal data referred to in Article 27 may not be stored beyond the first applicable date among the following dates:
- (a) the date on which prosecution is barred under the statute of limitations of all the Member States concerned by the investigation and prosecutions;
- (b) the date on which Eurojust is informed that the person has been acquitted and the judicial decision became final, in which case the Member State concerned shall inform Eurojust without delay;
- (c) three years after the date on which the judicial decision of the last of the Member States concerned by the investigation or prosecution became final;
- (d) the date on which Eurojust and the Member States concerned mutually established or agreed that it was no longer necessary for Eurojust to coordinate the investigation and prosecutions, unless there is an obligation to provide Eurojust with this information in accordance with Article 21(5) or (6);
- (e) three years after the date on which operational personal data were transmitted in accordance with Article 21(5) or (6).
1a. Eurojust shall not store operational personal data transmitted in accordance with Article 21a beyond the first of the following dates:
- (a) the date on which prosecution is barred under the statute of limitations of all the Member States concerned by the investigation or prosecution;
- (b) five years after the date on which the judicial decision of the last of the Member States concerned by the investigation or prosecution became final, or two years in the case of an acquittal or final decision not to prosecute;
- (c) the date on which Eurojust is informed of the decision of the competent national authority pursuant to Article 27(5).
Observance of the storage deadlines referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a shall be reviewed constantly by appropriate automated processing conducted by Eurojust, in particular from the moment Eurojust ceases to provide support.
A review of the need to store the data shall also be carried out every three years after they were entered.
If operational personal data referred to in Article 27(4) are stored for a period exceeding five years, the EDPS shall be informed thereof.
Before one of the storage deadlines referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a expires, Eurojust shall review the need for the continued storage of the operational personal data where and as long as this is necessary to perform its tasks.
It may decide by way of derogation to store those data until the following review. The reasons for the continued storage shall be justified and recorded. If no decision is taken on the continued storage of operational personal data at the time of the review, those data shall be deleted automatically.
Where, in accordance with paragraph 3, operational personal data have been stored beyond the storage deadlines referred to in paragraph 1, the EDPS shall also carry out a review of the need to store those data every three years.
Once the deadline for the storage of the last item of automated data from the file has expired, all documents in the file shall be destroyed with the exception of any original documents which Eurojust has received from national authorities and which need to be returned to their provider.
Where Eurojust has coordinated an investigation or prosecutions, the national members concerned shall inform each other whenever they receive information that the case has been dismissed or that all judicial decisions related to the case have become final.
Paragraph 5 shall not apply where:
- (a) this would damage the interests of a data subject who requires protection; in such cases, the operational personal data shall be used only with the express and written consent of the data subject;
- (b) the accuracy of the operational personal data is contested by the data subject; in such cases paragraph 5 shall not apply for a period enabling Member States or Eurojust, as appropriate, to verify the accuracy of such data;
- (c) the operational personal data are to be maintained for purposes of proof or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims;
- (d) the data subject opposes the erasure of the operational personal data and requests the restriction of their use instead; or
- (e) the operational personal data are further needed for archiving purposes in the public interest or statistical purposes.
Article 30
Security of operational personal data
Eurojust and Member States shall define mechanisms to ensure that the security measures referred to in Article 91 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 are addressed across information system boundaries.
Article 31
Right of access by the data subject
Any data subject who wishes to exercise the right of access referred to in Article 80 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 to operational personal data that relate to the data subject and which have been processed by Eurojust may make a request to Eurojust or to the national supervisory authority in the Member State of the data subject’s choice. That authority shall refer the request to Eurojust without delay, and in any case within one month of its receipt.
The request shall be answered by Eurojust without undue delay and in any case within three months of its receipt by Eurojust.
The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall be consulted by Eurojust on the decision to be taken in response to a request. The decision on access to data shall only be taken by Eurojust in close cooperation with the Member States directly concerned by the communication of such data. Where a Member State objects to Eurojust’s proposed decision, it shall notify Eurojust of the reasons for its objection. Eurojust shall comply with any such objection. The national members concerned shall subsequently notify the competent authorities of the content of Eurojust’s decision.
The national members concerned shall deal with the request and reach a decision on Eurojust’s behalf. Where the national members concerned are not in agreement, they shall refer the matter to the College, which shall take its decision on the request by a two-thirds majority.
Article 32
Limitations to the right of access
In the cases referred to in Article 81 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, Eurojust shall inform the data subject after consulting the competent authorities of the Member States concerned in accordance with Article 31(3) of this Regulation.
Article 33
Right to restriction of processing
Without prejudice to the exceptions set out in Article 29(7) of this Regulation, where the processing of operational personal data has been restricted under Article 82(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, such operational personal data shall only be processed for the protection of the rights of the data subject or another natural or legal person who is a party to the proceedings to which Eurojust is a party, or for the purposes laid down in Article 82(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Article 34
Authorised access to operational personal data within Eurojust
Only national members, their deputies, their Assistants and authorised seconded national experts, the persons referred to in Article 20(3) in so far as those persons are connected to the case management system and authorised Eurojust staff may, for the purpose of achieving Eurojust’s tasks, have access to operational personal data processed by Eurojust within the limits provided for in Articles 23, 24 and 25.
Article 35
Records of categories of processing activities
Eurojust shall maintain a record of all categories of processing activities under its responsibility. That record shall contain all of the following information:
- (a) Eurojust’s contact details and the name and the contact details of its Data Protection Officer;
- (b) the purposes of the processing;
- (c) the description of the categories of data subjects and of the categories of operational personal data;
- (d) the categories of recipients to whom the operational personal data have been or will be disclosed including recipients in third countries or international organisations;
- (e) where applicable, transfers of operational personal data to a third country or an international organisation, including the identification of that third country or international organisation;
- (f) where possible, the envisaged time limits for erasure of the different categories of data;
- (g) where possible, a general description of the technical and organisational security measures referred to in Article 91 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
The records referred to in paragraph 1 shall be in writing, including in electronic form.
Eurojust shall make the record available to the EDPS on request.
Article 36
Designation of the Data Protection Officer
The Executive Board shall designate a Data Protection Officer. The Data Protection Officer shall be a member of staff specifically appointed for this purpose. In the performance of his or her duties, the Data Protection Officer shall act independently and may not receive any instructions.
The Data Protection Officer shall be selected on the basis of his or her professional qualities and, in particular, expert knowledge of data protection law and practice, and ability to fulfil his or her tasks under this Regulation, in particular those referred to in Article 38.
Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published in the Official Journal of the European Union. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original to this format.
This text is published under EUR-Lex's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence.
EUR-Lex
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu — Source: EUR-Lex (Publications Office of the European Union). Reused under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Only EU legislation published in the printed Official Journal of the European Union is deemed authentic; consolidated texts are reproduced here for documentation purposes and have been reformatted to Markdown.