Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/734 of 26 March 2026 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of yarns of polyamide originating in the People’s Republic of China

(234) The Commission distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Union industry from the injurious effects of the dumped imports. The Commission found that the imports from third countries (other than China), and export performance of the Union industry did not contribute to the material injury suffered by the Union industry.

(235) The drop in consumption might have contributed to the injury but not to the extent that it would break the causal link, as the sales volumes lost to imports from China exceeded the drop in consumption.

(236) On the basis of the above, the Commission concluded at this stage that the dumped imports from the country concerned caused material injury to the Union industry and that the other factors, considered individually or collectively, did not attenuate the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury. The injury is clear, in particular as regards production and sales volumes, market share, profitability, cash flow, and return on investments.

(237) To determine the level of the measures, the Commission examined whether a duty lower than the margin of dumping would be sufficient to remove the injury caused by dumped imports to the Union industry.

(238) The injury would be removed if the Union industry would be able to obtain a target profit by selling at a target price in the sense of Articles 7(2c) and 7(2d) of the basic Regulation.

(239) In accordance with Article 7(2c) of the basic Regulation, for establishing the target profit, the Commission took into account the following factors: the level of profitability before the increase of imports from the country under investigation, the level of profitability needed to cover full costs and investments, research and development (R & D) and innovation, and the level of profitability to be expected under normal conditions of competition. Such profit margin should not be lower than 6 %.

(240) As a first step, the Commission established a basic profit covering full costs under normal conditions of competition. As the Union industry suffered losses in most of the period considered, and profits in 2022 were very low, the Union industry data could not be used, the Commission established a minimal reasonable profit margin at 6 %. This target profit was also in line with the target profit provided in the complaint.

(241) One sampled Union producer provided evidence that its level of investments, R & D and innovation during the period considered would have been higher under normal conditions of competition. The Commission verified this information and concluded that the provided internal documentation and communications showed that the company did not carry out certain investments due to the situation on the Union market. To reflect this in the target profit, the Commission calculated the difference between investments, R & D and innovation (‘IRI’) expenses under normal conditions of competition as provided by the sampled Union producer and verified by the Commission with actual IRI expenses over the period considered. Such difference, expressed as a percentage of turnover, was [1,8–3,0] %.

(242) That percentage was added to the basic profit mentioned in the recital (240), leading to a target profit of [7,2–9,0] % for the product types produced by that sampled Union producer.

(243) In accordance with Article 7(2d) of the basic Regulation, as a final step, the Commission assessed the future costs resulting from Multilateral Environmental Agreements, and protocols thereunder, to which the Union is a party, and of ILO Conventions listed in Annex Ia that the Union industry will incur during the period of the application of the measure pursuant to Article 11(2). Two of the three sampled Union producers provided evidence of having incurred compliance cost, such as internal data and compliance cost audit report. Based on the evidence available, which was supported by the companies’ reporting tools and forecasts, the Commission established an additional cost of [42–60] EUR/tonne, which was reflected in the non-injurious price mentioned in recital (244) for the product types produced by the two sampled Union producers.

(244) On this basis, the Commission calculated a non-injurious price of [5 500–6 200] EUR/tonne on weighted average for the like product of the Union industry by applying the above-mentioned target profit margin (see recital (242)) to the cost of production of the sampled Union producers during the investigation period and then adding the adjustments under Article 7(2d) on a type-by-type basis.

(245) The Commission then determined the injury margin level on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price of the sampled cooperating exporting producers in the PRC, as established for the price undercutting calculations, with the weighted average non-injurious price of the like product sold by the sampled Union producers on the Union market during the investigation period. Any difference resulting from this comparison was expressed as a percentage of the weighted average import CIF value.

(247) As explained in the Notice of Initiation, the complainant provided the Commission sufficient evidence that there are raw material distortions in the country concerned regarding the product under investigation. Therefore, in accordance with Article 7(2a) of the basic Regulation, this investigation examined the alleged distortions to assess whether, if relevant, a duty lower than the margin of dumping would be sufficient to remove injury.

(248) However, as the margins adequate to remove injury were higher than the dumping margins, the Commission considered that, at this stage, it was not necessary to address this issue.

(250) Having decided to apply Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether it could clearly conclude that it was not in the Union interest to adopt measures in this case, despite the determination of injurious dumping, in accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation. The determination of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, including those of the Union industry, importers and users.

(251) The investigation has shown that the Union industry suffered material injury caused by the increasing volume of dumped imports from the PRC. The injury materialised in particular in a strong decline in production and sales volumes and a continuous erosion of its profit margin, due to the price depression caused by these imports. Should the anti-dumping measures not be imposed, the Union industry would continue to be lossmaking which would further compromise its viability. On the contrary, the imposition of the measures will help to restore fair competition on the Union market and thus allow the Union industry to recover.

(252) The Commission therefore concluded that the imposition of the measures would be in the interest of the Union industry.

(253) Only one importer submitted a partial reply to an importer questionnaire in this anti-dumping procedure. However, this reply did not contain any descriptive part nor any opinion. However, the company has provided data showing that its import from China was minimal and its financial situation was very good.

(254) Considering the above, the Commission concluded that the measures will not have disproportionally negative effects on unrelated importers and traders.

(255) None of the users that registered as interested party filled in a user questionnaire or made any submission with regard to the potential imposition of anti-dumping measures or the procedure itself, with the exception of the product scope exclusion request described in recital (27). Additionally, two users, not registered as interested parties, sent letters explaining that potential measures would adversely affect them and/or the downstream industry, but they presented no evidence nor submitted any data.

(256) Considering the above, the Commission concluded that the measures will not have disproportionally negative effect on users of the product under investigation.

(257) On the basis of the above, the Commission concluded that there were no compelling reasons that it was not in the Union interest to impose measures on imports of polyamide yarn originating in the PRC at this stage of the investigation.

(258) On the basis of the conclusions reached by the Commission on dumping, injury, causation, level of measures and Union interest, provisional measures should be imposed to prevent further injury being caused to the Union industry by the dumped imports.

(259) Provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports of yarns of polyamide originating in the People’s Republic of China, in accordance with Article 7(2a) of the basic Regulation. The Commission concluded in recital (249) that the appropriate level to remove injury should be the dumping margin.

(261) The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of this investigation. Therefore, they reflect the situation found during this investigation with respect to these companies. These duty rates are exclusively applicable to imports of the product concerned originating in the country concerned and produced by the named legal entities. Imports of the product concerned produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part and in the Annex of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, should be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other imports originating in the People’s Republic of China’. They should not be subject to any of the individual anti-dumping duty rates.

(262) To minimise the risks of circumvention due to the difference in duty rates, special measures are needed to ensure the application of the individual anti-dumping duties. The application of individual anti-dumping duties is only applicable upon presentation of a valid commercial invoice to the customs authorities of the Member States. The invoice must conform to the requirements set out in Article 1(3) of this regulation. Until such invoice is presented, imports should be subject to the anti-dumping duty applicable to ‘all other imports originating in the People’s Republic of China.

(263) While presentation of this invoice is necessary for the customs authorities of the Member States to apply the individual rates of anti-dumping duty to imports, it is not the only element to be taken into account by the customs authorities. Indeed, even if presented with an invoice meeting all the requirements set out in Article 1(3) of this regulation, the customs authorities of Member States must carry out their usual checks and may, like in all other cases, require additional documents (shipping documents etc.) for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the particulars contained in the declaration and ensure that the subsequent application of the lower rate of duty is justified, in compliance with customs law.

(264) Should the exports by one of the companies benefiting from lower individual duty rates increase significantly in volume after the imposition of the measures concerned, such an increase in volume could be considered as constituting in itself a change in the pattern of trade due to the imposition of measures within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation. In such circumstances and provided the conditions are met an anti-circumvention investigation may be initiated. This investigation may, inter alia, examine the need for the removal of individual duty rate(s) and the consequent imposition of a country-wide duty.

(265) As mentioned in recital (3), the Commission made imports of the product concerned subject to registration. Registration took place with a view to possibly collecting duties retroactively under Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.

(266) In view of the findings at provisional stage, the registration of imports should cease/be discontinued.

(267) No decision on a possible retroactive application of anti-dumping measures has been taken at this stage of the proceeding.

(268) In accordance with Article 19a of the basic Regulation, the Commission informed interested parties about the planned imposition of provisional duties. This information was also made available to the general public via DG TRADE’s website. Interested parties were given three working days to provide comments on the accuracy of the calculations specifically disclosed to them. Comments were received from Eversun Group and Highsun Group.

(269) Eversun Group submitted that, in the case of a related trader, the Commission in the calculation of certain credit costs, limited to a small number of transactions, had not taken into account the appropriate payment terms. In this regard, the Commission corrected the credit costs adjustment which, however, did not have an effect on the level of the dumping margin of the Eversun Group.

(270) Highsun Group submitted that the producer Xinhui Dehua Nylon Chips Co., Ltd. was omitted from the list of companies of the proposed duties and had certain other comments regarding the labour benchmarking.

(271) With regard to the submission of Highsun Group, the Commission corrected the list of companies, by including the company mentioned above in Article 1(2) of the regulation. The other comments submitted by the Highsun Group did not concern the accuracy of the calculations, but rather to the methodologies used by the Commission in the determination of their respective dumping margin. Those comments will therefore be considered, together with all other submissions, after the publication of provisional measures.

(272) In the interests of sound administration, the Commission will invite the interested parties to submit written comments and/or to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings within a fixed deadline.

(273) The findings concerning the imposition of provisional duties are provisional and may be amended at the definitive stage of the investigation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2026.

For the Commission The President Ursula VON DER LEYEN

(1) OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1036/oj.

(2) OJ C, C/2025/4120, 29.7.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4120/oj.

(3) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1984 of 3 October 2025 making imports of yarns of polyamide originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ L, 2025/1984, 6.10.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/1984/oj).

(4) Save No t25.008288.

(5) Save No t25.008473.

(6) https://tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/investigations/case-view?caseId=2805.

(7) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959 of 17 July 2024 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of erythritol originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L, 2024/1959, 19.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/1959/oj); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180 of 16 October 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following a new exporter review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L, 2023/2180, 17.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/2180/oj); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752 of 12 April 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium gluconate originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 100, 13.4.2023, p. 16, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/752/oj); Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/441 of 11 March 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the (OJ L 85, 21.3.2021, p. 154, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2021/441/oj).

(8) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 161-162; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 89-90; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recital 70.

(9) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 103-113; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 46-50; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recital 49.

(10) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 114-122; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 51-55; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recitals 50-54. While the right to appoint and to remove key management personnel in SOEs by the relevant State authorities, as provided for in the Chinese legislation, can be considered to reflect the corresponding ownership rights, CCP cells in enterprises, state owned and private alike, represent another important channel through which the State can interfere with business decisions. According to the PRC’s company law, a CCP organisation is to be established in every company (with at least three CCP members as specified in the CCP Constitution) and the company shall provide the necessary conditions for the activities of the party organisation. In the past, this requirement appears not to have always been followed or strictly enforced. However, since at least 2016 the CCP has reinforced its claims to control business decisions in SOEs as a matter of political principle. The CCP is also reported to exercise pressure on private companies to put ‘patriotism’ first and to follow party discipline. In 2017, it was reported that party cells existed in 70 % of some 1,86 million privately owned companies, with growing pressure for the CCP organisations to have a final say over the business decisions within their respective companies. These rules are of general application throughout the Chinese economy, across all sectors, including to the producers of the product under review and the suppliers of their inputs.

(11) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 123-133; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 56-65; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recitals 55-63.

(12) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 134-138; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 66-69; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recital 64.

(13) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 139-142; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 71-72; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recital 65.

(14) Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1959, recitals 143-152; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180, recitals 72-81; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/752, recital 66.

(15) Commission Staff Working Document on Significant Distortions in the Economy of the People’s Republic of China for the purposes of Trade Defence Investigations, 10 April 2024 (SWD(2024) 91 final), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=SWD(2024)91&lang=en, including the previous version of the document: Commission Staff Working Document on Significant Distortions in the Economy of the People’s Republic of China for the purposes of Trade Defence Investigations, 20 December 2017 (SWD(2017) 483 final/2), available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=SWD(2017)483&lang=en.

(16) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 59-60 and paragraphs 69-77.

(17) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 61-64.

(18) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 65-66.

(19) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 74-77.

(20) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 78-81.

(21) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 82-85.

(22) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 86-89.

(23) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 90-94.

(24) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 96-105.

(25) Complaint (open version), paragraphs 106-108.

(26) See at: http://www.eversun-jinjiang.com/about/company-profile.htm (accessed on 27 November 2025).

(27) See at https://www.hscc.com/profile.html (accessed on 27 November 2025).

(28) See at: https://www.hdnylon.com/aboutus (accessed on 4 December 2025).

(29) See at: https://www.shenma.com/ (accessed on 4 December 2025).

(30) See at: http://www.zjsnny.com/wap/content.aspx?channel_id=13&category_id=138#:~:text=%E4%B8%89%E5%AE%81%E5%8C%96%E5%B7%A5%E5%A7%8B%E5%BB%BA,%E6%B0%91%E8%90%A5%E4%BC%81%E4%B8%9A%E7%AC%AC12%E4%BD%8D%E3%80%82 (accessed on 4 December 2025).

(31) See at: http://www.sinopecnews.com.cn/xnews/content/2024-12/11/content_7113538.html (accessed on 4 December 2025).

(32) See at: https://www.shenma.com/ (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(33) See Shenma Industrial Co. Ltd. annual report 2024, p. 132, available at: http://file.finance.sina.com.cn/211.154.219.97:9494/MRGG/CNSESH_STOCK/2025/2025-3/2025-03-26/10806904.PDF (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(34) See Central China Securities’ report: Nylon industry chain analysis and industry overview in Henan Province, p. 12, available at: https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202405211634051550_1.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(35) See: http://qxb-pdf-osscache.qixin.com/AnBaseinfo/55e309b976671b808bf4c9e04a6c0177.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(36) See: http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n2588045/n27271785/n27271792/index.html (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(37) See Article 33 of the CCP Constitution, Article 19 of the Chinese Company Law. See also the Report, Chapter 3, p. 47-50.

(38) See CPCIF Articles of Association, Article 3, available at: http://www.cpcif.org.cn/detail/40288043661e27fb01661e386a3f0001?e=1 (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(39) Ibid.

(40) See CPCIF Articles of Association, Article 36, available at: http://www.cpcif.org.cn/detail/40288043661e27fb01661e386a3f0001?e=1 (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(41) See at: http://www.cpcif.org.cn/detail/40288043661fd28501661fd4ed380000?e=1 (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(42) Ibid.

(43) See CCFA Articles of Association, Article 3, available at: https://www.ccfa.com.cn/3/202109/2260.html (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(44) Ibid.

(45) See CCFA Articles of Association, Article 36, available at: https://www.ccfa.com.cn/3/202109/2260.html (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(46) See at: https://www.ccfa.com.cn/11/202404/4264.html (accessed on 9 December2025).

(47) See Guiding Catalogue for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition), p. 24, available at: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/fzggwl/202312/P020231229700886191069.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(48) Ibid, p. 49.

(49) See Catalogue of Encouraged Industries in the Western Regions, p. 36, available at: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/fzggwl/202411/P020241129575948108198.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(50) See Guiding Catalogue for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition), p. 87, available at: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/fzggwl/202312/P020231229700886191069.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(51) See Section III.8.3 of the 14th FYP on economic and social development and 2035 perspectives, available at: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(52) See at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-04/08/content_5683972.htm#msdynttrid=WRmyf07ph0z74SHmXoOLKjRWl09BdZ4lGdYp9fiI9xU (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(53) Ibid., Section I.3.

(54) Ibid., Section II.3.

(55) Ibid., Section III.4.

(56) See at: https://policy.mofcom.gov.cn/claw/clawContent.shtml?id=93802 (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(57) Ibid., Table 2.4.

(58) See at: https://huanbao.bjx.com.cn/news/20211201/1191133.shtml (accessed on 9 December 2025).

(59) Ibid., Section II.2.4.

(60) Ibid, see Section III.1.2.

(61) See at: https://fgw.henan.gov.cn/2023/04-12/2723836.html (accessed on 15 August 2025).

(62) Ibid., Section II.3.

(63) See at: https://www.cq.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkml/szfwj/qtgw/202108/t20210803_9538603.html (accessed on 14 August 2025).

(64) See at: http://www.yongrongjinjiang.com/news/comnews-detail-3785.htm (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(65) See at: https://tzb2.fjut.edu.cn/2020/0529/c1232a123691/page.psp (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(66) See at: https://www.hscc.com/news/655.html (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(67) See at: https://www.hscc.com/news/1008.html (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(68) See Shenma Industrial Co. Ltd annual report 2024, p. 58, available at: http://static.cninfo.com.cn/finalpage/2025-03-21/1222865317.pdf, (accessed on 14 August 2025).

(69) See at: http://www.hbwmw.gov.cn/wmywtj/202012/t20201229_169655.shtml (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(70) See at: https://chemeng.dlut.edu.cn/info/1146/12702.htm (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(71) See at: http://www.sinopecgroup.com/group/gsglc/index.shtml (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(72) See at: http://www.sinopecgroup.com/group/000/000/041/41878.shtml (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(73) The Report, Part III, Chapter 16.

(74) Ibid., Section 16.3.

(75) See Section IV.1.3, available at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/29/content_5665166.htm (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(76) See at: https://www.fujian.gov.cn/zwgk/ztzl/sxzygwzxsgzx/sdjj/szjj/202501/t20250120_6704543.htm (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(77) See at: http://fj.people.com.cn/n2/2021/1021/c181466-34967542.html (accessed on 10 December 2025).

(78) See at: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-murky-bankruptcies-expose-hazards-foreign-investors-2025-04-15/ (accessed on 12 December 2025).

(79) See Section VIII.16, available at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-04/08/content_5683972.htm#msdynttrid=WRmyf07ph0z74SHmXoOLKjRWl09BdZ4lGdYp9fiI9xU (accessed on 18 April 2025).

(80) See at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202511/content_7047643.htm (accessed on 12 December 2025).

(81) Ibid, Section 11.

(82) World Bank Open Data – Upper Middle Income, https://data.worldbank.org/income-level/upper-middle-income.

(83) POY (partially oriented yarn), FDY (fully drawn yarn), HOY (highly oriented yarn).

(84) DTY (drawn textured yarn), ACY (air covered yarn), ATY (air textured yarn), TDY (twisted drawn yarn), TTY (twisted textured yarn).

(85) https://evershinetex.com/.

(86) Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/833/oj).

(87) Turkish 12 Digit Hs Codes Under Chapter 39 – TurkExim.

(88) POY (partially oriented yarn), FDY (fully drawn yarn), HOY (highly oriented yarn).

(89) DTY (drawn textured yarn), ACY (air covered yarn), ATY (air textured yarn), TDY (twisted drawn yarn), TTY (twisted textured yarn).

(90) https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Structure-of-Earnings-Statistics-2022-49750&dil=2.

(91) https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Home/En.

(92) https://www.tuik.gov.tr/Home/Index.

(93) Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports from certain third countries (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 33, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/755/oj). Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation considers that domestic prices in those countries cannot be used for the purpose of determining normal value.

(94) https://data.tuik.gov.tr.

(95) epdk.gov.tr => Press releases => select Electricity Market board decisions.

(96) EMRA | Energy Market Regulatory Authority (epdk.gov.tr) => Press releases => select Electricity market board decisions.

(97) https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/investmentguide/pages/cost-of-doing-business.aspx#.

(98) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 of 25 September 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 315, 29.9.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2020/1336/oj).

(99) In 2022 it was eleven companies – but one of the European producers ceased production of the polyamide yarn in this year.

(100) Wood Mackenzie Global Production YP, Wood Mackenzie PA Global Market Overview.

(101) Of the sampled producers.