The Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2013

Type Scottish-Statutory-Instrument
Publication 2013-06-25
State In force
Jurisdiction Scotland
Department King's Printer for Scotland
Reform history JSON API PDF

Made: 25th June 2013

Laid before the Scottish Parliament: 27th June 2013

Coming into force: 1st October 2013

There has been consultation as required by Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety[^f00004].

PART 1 — Introductory

Citation, extent and commencement

1

These Regulations may be cited as the Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2013, extend to Scotland only and come into force on 1st October 2013.

Interpretation

2

PART 2 — Erucic acid in food

Scope

3

Controls on erucic acid

4

PART 3 — Contaminants in food

Controls on contaminants in food

5

a person who contravenes or fails to comply with any of the ... provisions specified in paragraph (2) is guilty of an offence.

PART 4 — Administration and enforcement

Penalties

6

Anyone convicted of an offence under regulation 4(3) or regulation 5(1) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.

Enforcement and competent authorities

7

Application of various sections of the Food Safety Act 1990

8

(9) (1) An authorised officer of a food authority may at all reasonable times inspect any food intended for human consumption which has been placed on the market and subsections (2) to (7) below shall apply where, on such an inspection, it appears to the authorised officer that the placing on the market of any food fails to comply with any of the requirements specified in regulation 4(1) or 5(2) of the Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2013 (“the ... requirements”). (2) The authorised officer may either— (a) give notice to the person in charge of the food that, until the notice is withdrawn, the food or any specified portion of it— (i) is not to be used for human consumption; and (ii) either is not to be removed or is to be removed to a place at which there are facilities to carry out sampling in the manner required by law; or (b) seize the food and remove it in order to have it dealt with by a sheriff. (3) Where the authorised officer exercises the power conferred by subsection (2)(a) above, that officer shall, as soon as is reasonably practicable and in any event within 21 days, determine whether or not the food complies with the ... requirements and— (a) if satisfied that it does comply, shall forthwith withdraw the notice; (b) if not so satisfied, shall seize the food and remove it in order to have it dealt with by a sheriff. (4) Where an authorised officer exercises the powers conferred by subsection (2)(b) or (3)(b) above, the officer shall inform the person in charge of the food of the intention to have it dealt with by a sheriff and any person who in connection with any of the ... requirements might be liable to a prosecution in respect of the food shall, if that person attends before the sheriff by whom the food falls to be dealt with, be entitled to be heard and to call witnesses. (5) If it appears to a sheriff, on the basis of such evidence as the sheriff considers appropriate in the circumstances, that any food falling to be dealt with under this section fails to comply with any of the ... requirements the sheriff shall condemn the food and order— (a) the food to be destroyed or to be so disposed of as to prevent it from being used for human consumption; and (b) any expenses reasonably incurred in connection with the destruction or disposal to be defrayed by the owner of the food. (6) If a notice under subsection (2)(a) above is withdrawn, or the sheriff by whom any food falls to be dealt with under this section refuses to condemn it, the food authority shall compensate the owner of the food for any depreciation in its value resulting from the action taken by the authorised officer. (7) Any disputed question as to the right to or the amount of any compensation payable under subsection (6) above shall be determined by a single arbiter appointed, failing agreement between the parties, by the sheriff. (8) Any person who knowingly contravenes the requirements of a notice under subsection (2)(a) above shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.

Consequential amendment

9

In Schedule 1 to the Food Safety (Sampling and Qualifications) (Scotland) Regulations 2013[^f00015] (provisions to which those Regulations do not apply), for columns 1 and 2 of the entry relating to the Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2010[^f00016] substitute—

The Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2013 (to the extent that a sample falls to be prepared and analysed in accordance with Regulation 1881/2006 as that expression is defined in those Regulations) S.S.I. 2013/217.

Revocations

10

The Regulations specified in the Schedule are revoked.

SCHEDULE — Revocations

Regulations revoked Reference
Mineral Hydrocarbons in Food (Scotland) Regulations 1966 S.I. 1966/1263
Erucic Acid in Food (Scotland) Regulations 1977 S.I. 1977/1028
Erucic Acid in Food (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 1982 S.I. 1982/18
Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2010 S.S.I. 2010/329

Signed

MICHAEL MATHESON — Authorised to sign by the Scottish Ministers — 2013-06-25

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

EXPLANATORY NOTE

These Regulations, in Scotland, revoke (regulation 10 and the Schedule) and remake, with amendments, the Contaminants in Food (Scotland) Regulations 2010.

Paragraph 1A of Schedule 2 to the European Communities Act 1972 is cited in the enabling powers for these Regulations because reference is made in regulation 2 to certain EU instruments which are defined in the Regulations as meaning those EU instruments as amended from time to time.

These Regulations make provision for—

These Regulations also provide for the execution and enforcement of Commission Regulation (EC) No 124/2009 (“Regulation 124/2009”), which concerns maximum permitted levels for certain feed additives that may, in specified circumstances, occur in food, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No. 610/2012.

The Regulations—

The Commission Regulation specifies the European Union methods of sampling and analysis that are required to be used for the official control of levels of the substances covered by it. Those methods are set out in—

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published on legislation.gov.uk. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original CLML XML to this format.