The Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 Remedial Order 2014

Type Scottish-Statutory-Instrument
Publication 2014-04-02
State In force
Jurisdiction Scotland
Department Queen's Printer for Scotland
PDF Download
articles Not indexed
Reform history JSON API

Made: 2nd April 2014

Coming into force: 3rd April 2014

In accordance with section 13(2) of the 2001 Act a draft of this Order has been laid before and approved by resolution of the Scottish Parliament.

Citation and commencement

1

Amendment of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003

Amendment of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003

2

(72A) (1) Section 73 applies to a tenancy continuing to have effect by virtue of section 72(6) unless the tenancy is a relevant tenancy. (2) If— (a) the tenancy is a relevant tenancy, (b) the circumstances described in subsection (3) do not apply, and (c) the landlord gives an application notice to the tenant within the intimation period, section 73 applies to the tenancy from the date on which the application notice is given. (3) The circumstances are that— (a) the landlord purchased the landlord’s interest in the tenancy at a time when it was no longer possible for an order under section 72(8) to be made in respect of the tenancy, or (b) the landlord acquired (by any means) the landlord’s interest in the tenancy from— (i) the landlord who purchased that interest in the circumstances described in paragraph (a), or (ii) a successor of such a landlord. (4) In this section— - “application notice” means a notice, in writing, intimating that the landlord may bring the tenancy to an end in accordance with section 73, - “the intimation period” means the period of 12 months beginning on 28th November 2014, - “relevant tenancy” means a tenancy continuing to have effect by virtue of section 72(6) where— the action taken by a limited partner in consequence of which the tenancy was purportedly terminated (being an action described in section 72(3)(a) to (c)) occurred before 1st July 2003, notice was given to the landlord under section 72(6) before the coming into force of this section, and there is no ongoing application for an order under section 72(8) in respect of the tenancy; - “successor” includes the executor, assignee, legatee, disponee, guardian, legal representative (within the meaning of Part I of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995) or (in relation to a sequestration) trustee or interim trustee, of a landlord. (5) For the purposes of this section, a reference to an ongoing application for an order under section 72(8) is a reference to an application made to the Land Court under section 72(7) before the coming into force of this section and which, at that time— (a) has not been finally determined by the Land Court, or (b) is subject to an appeal from that Court which has not been finally determined.

Ongoing cases

Effect of amendments on ongoing cases

3

Transitional and saving provision

Preservation of landlord’s right to make an application

4

Continuing application of section 73 of the 2003 Act

5

Despite the repeal of section 72(10) of the 2003 Act, section 73 of that Act continues to apply in respect of any tenancy to which it applied immediately prior to that repeal.

Signed

RICHARD LOCHHEAD — A member of the Scottish Government — 2nd April 2014

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order)

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Order makes amendments to the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 (“the 2003 Act”) to remove the incompatibility, arising from section 72(10) of that Act, with a Convention right.

Section 72(6) of the 2003 Act provides that if a landlord sought to bring an agricultural tenancy to an end by dissolving a limited partnership on or after 16th September 2002, then the tenancy continues in existence with the non-landlord partner, known as the general partner, as tenant in his or her own right (if the general partner gives notice that this is intended to happen). Section 73 of the 2003 Act is a counterpart to section 72(6). It entitles the landlord to bring the tenancy to an end by service of a notice to quit at a time of the landlord’s own choosing. However section 72(10) qualifies this position and provides that section 73 does not apply to landlords who served the dissolution notice between 16th September 2002 and 30th June 2003.

The Supreme Court in a judgement dated 24th April 2013, Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 22, held that the difference in treatment between those landlords who served a dissolution notice between 16th September 2002 and 30th June 2003 and those landlords who served notices on or after 1st July 2003 was unfair and disproportionate and did not pursue an aim that was reasonably related to the aim of the legislation as a whole. It therefore made a finding that section 72 (10) of the 2003 Act violated art. 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights and that the provision was outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. The Supreme Court made an order under section 102(2)(b) that the effect of the finding should be suspended for 12 months or such shorter period as may be necessary to correct the defect. The 12 month period expires on 23rd April 2014.

In order to remove the incompatible effect of section 72(10) this Order inserts a new section (section 72A) into the 2003 Act. This applies section 73 unless the tenancy is a relevant tenancy (section 72A(1)). Where the tenancy is a relevant tenancy, section 73 only applies, other than in prescribed circumstances, where the landlord has given an application notice within 12 months from 28th November 2014 (section 72A(2)).

The prescribed circumstances (section 72A(3)) are where the landlord’s interest has been purchased after the section 72(6) notice was given and at a time when it was no longer possible to make an order under section 72(8) that section 72(6) does not apply and has never applied.

Section 72A(1) applies section 73 to those cases where there is an ongoing application to the Scottish Land Court under section 72(8) but, by virtue of article 3, in these cases the Land Court has a discretion on disposal of these ongoing applications including, but not limited to, specifying shorter periods of notice than in section 73(4) and (5) of the 2003 Act and specifying the date on the which the tenancy is to be terminated. A landlord who has been given notice under section 72(6) in the 28 days prior to the coming into force of this Order will have 28 days from the date of notice to apply to the Land Court and have his or her case treated in the same way as ongoing applications.

Articles 4 and 5 make transitional and savings provisions.

Section 72 (4) and (5) are repealed as spent and section 72(7)-(11) are repealed with the effect that a tenancy operating by virtue of section 72(6) can no longer be effectively annulled under section 72(8) on application to the Land Court.

Footnotes

[^f00001]: 2001 asp 7.

[^f00002]: 2003 asp 11.

[^f00003]: “Convention right” has the meaning given by section 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (c.42). In the case of Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 22, judgement 24th April 2013, the Supreme Court found that section 72(10) was outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and made an order under section 102(2)(b) of the Scotland Act 1998 suspending the effect of the finding for 12 months or such shorter period as may be required for the defect to be corrected and for that correction to take effect.

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published on legislation.gov.uk. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original CLML XML to this format.

This text is published under legislation.gov.uk's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence. legislation.gov.uk
Open Government Licence v3.0 (attribution required)
© Crown and database right. Derived from content available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 from legislation.gov.uk.