Mental Health Act 1983

Type Public General Act
Publication 1983-05-09
Last updated 2026-04-06
State In force
Department Statute Law Database
articles Not indexed
Reform history JSON API
  • (b) the court is of the opinion, having regard to all the circumstances including the nature of the offence and the character and antecedents of the offender, and to the other available methods of dealing with him, that the most suitable method of disposing of the case is by means of an order under this section.
  • (3) Where a person is charged before a magistrates’ court with any act or omission as an offence and the court would have power, on convicting him of that offence, to make an order under subsection (1) above in his case . . . , then, if the court is satisfied that the accused did the act or made the omission charged, the court may, if it thinks fit, make such an order without convicting him.
  • (4) An order for the admission of an offender to a hospital (in this Act referred to as “a hospital order”) shall not be made under this section unless the court is satisfied on the written or oral evidence of the approved clinician who would have overall responsibility for his case or of some other person representing the managers of the hospital that arrangements have been made for his admission to that hospital. . . , and for his admission to it within the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the making of such an order; and the court may, pending his admission within that period, give such directions as it thinks fit for his conveyance to and detention in a place of safety.
  • (5) If within the said period of 28 days it appears to the Secretary of State that by reason of an emergency or other special circumstances it is not practicable for the patient to be received into the hospital specified in the order, he may give directions for the admission of the patient to such other hospital as appears to be appropriate instead of the hospital so specified; and where such directions are given—
  • (a) the Secretary of State shall cause the person having the custody of the patient to be informed, and
  • (b) the hospital order shall have effect as if the hospital specified in the directions were substituted for the hospital specified in the order.
  • (6) An order placing an offender under the guardianship of a local social services authority or of any other person (in this Act referred to as “a guardianship order”) shall not be made under this section unless the court is satisfied that that authority or person is willing to receive the offender into guardianship.
  • (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (8) Where an order is made under this section, the court shall not—
  • (a) pass sentence of imprisonment or impose a fine or make a community order (within the meaning given by section 200 of the Sentencing Code) or a youth rehabilitation order (within the meaning given by section 173 of that Code) in respect of the offence,
  • (b) if the order under this section is a hospital order, make a referral order (within the meaning given by section 83 of that Code) in respect of the offence, or
  • (c) make in respect of the offender . . . an order under section 376 of that Code (binding over of parent or guardian),

but the court may make any other order which it has power to make apart from this section; and for the purposes of this subsection “sentence of imprisonment” includes any sentence or order for detention.

Interim hospital orders

38
  • (1) Where a person is convicted before the Crown Court of an offence punishable with imprisonment (other than an offence the sentence for which is fixed by law) or is convicted by a magistrates’ court of an offence punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment and the court before or by which he is convicted is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of two registered medical practitioners—
  • (a) that the offender is suffering from mental disorder ; and
  • (b) that there is reason to suppose that the mental disorder from which the offender is suffering is such that it may be appropriate for a hospital order to be made in his case,

the court may, before making a hospital order or dealing with him in some other way, make an order (in this Act referred to as “an interim hospital order”) authorising his admission to such hospital as may be specified in the order and his detention there in accordance with this section.

  • (2) In the case of an offender who is subject to an interim hospital order the court may make a hospital order without his being brought before the court if he is represented by an authorised person who is given an opportunity of being heard.
  • (3) At least one of the registered medical practitioners whose evidence is taken into account under subsection (1) above shall be employed at the hospital which is to be specified in the order.
  • (4) An interim hospital order shall not be made for the admission of an offender to a hospital unless the court is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of the approved clinician who would have overall responsibility for his case or of some other person representing the managers of the hospital, that arrangements have been made for his admission to that hospital and for his admission to it within the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the order; and if the court is so satisfied the court may, pending his admission, give directions for his conveyance to and detention in a place of safety.
  • (5) An interim hospital order—
  • (a) shall be in force for such period, not exceeding 12 weeks, as the court may specify when making the order; but
  • (b) may be renewed for further periods of not more than 28 days at a time if it appears to the court, on the written or oral evidence of the responsible clinician , that the continuation of the order is warranted;

but no such order shall continue in force for more than twelve months in all and the court shall terminate the order if it makes a hospital order in respect of the offender or decides after considering the written or oral evidence of the responsible clinician to deal with the offender in some other way.

  • (6) The power of renewing an interim hospital order may be exercised without the offender being brought before the court if he is represented by counsel or a solicitor and his counsel or solicitor is given an opportunity of being heard.
  • (7) If an offender absconds from a hospital in which he is detained in pursuance of an interim hospital order, or while being conveyed to or from such a hospital, he may be arrested without warrant by a constable and shall, after being arrested, be brought as soon as practicable before the court that made the order; and the court may thereupon terminate the order and deal with him in any way in which it could have dealt with him if no such order had been made.

Information as to hospitals

39
  • (1) Where a court is minded to make a hospital order or interim hospital order in respect of any person it may request—
  • (a) the integrated care board ... Local Health Board for the area in which that person resides or last resided; or
  • (b) NHS England or the National Assembly for Wales or any other integrated care board ... Local Health Board that appears to the court to be appropriate,

to furnish the court with such information as that integrated care board ... Local Health Board or NHS England or the National Assembly for Wales have or can reasonably obtain with respect to the hospital or hospitals (if any) in their area or elsewhere at which arrangements could be made for the admission of that person in pursuance of the order, and that integrated care board ... Local Health Board or NHS England or the National Assembly for Wales shall comply with any such request.

  • (1ZA) A request under this section to NHS England may relate only to services or facilities the provision of which NHS England arranges.
  • (1A) In relation to a person who has not attained the age of 18 years, subsection (1) above shall have effect as if the reference to the making of a hospital order included a reference to a remand under section 35 or 36 above or the making of an order under section 44 below.
  • (1B) Where the person concerned has not attained the age of 18 years, the information which may be requested under subsection (1) above includes, in particular, information about the availability of accommodation or facilities designed so as to be specially suitable for patients who have not attained the age of 18 years.
  • (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Effect of hospital orders, guardianship orders and interim hospital orders

40
  • (1) A hospital order shall be sufficient authority—
  • (a) for a constable, an approved mental health professional or any other person directed to do so by the court to convey the patient to the hospital specified in the order within a period of 28 days; and
  • (b) for the managers of the hospital to admit him at any time within that period and thereafter detain him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
  • (2) A guardianship order shall confer on the authority or person named in the order as guardian the same powers as a guardianship application made and accepted under Part II of this Act.
  • (3) Where an interim hospital order is made in respect of an offender—
  • (a) a constable or any other person directed to do so by the court shall convey the offender to the hospital specified in the order within the period mentioned in section 38(4) above; and
  • (b) the managers of the hospital shall admit him within that period and thereafter detain him in accordance with the provisions of section 38 above.
  • (4) A patient who is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of a hospital order, or placed under guardianship by a guardianship order, shall, subject to the provisions of this subsection, be treated for the purposes of the provisions of this Act mentioned in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act as if he had been so admitted or placed on the date of the order in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment or a guardianship application, as the case may be, duly made under Part II of this Act, but subject to any modifications of those provisions specified in that Part of that Schedule.
  • (5) Where a patient is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of a hospital order, or placed under guardianship by a guardianship order, any previous application, hospital order or guardianship order by virtue of which he was liable to be detained in a hospital or subject to guardianship shall cease to have effect; but if the first-mentioned order, or the conviction on which it was made, is quashed on appeal, this subsection shall not apply and section 22 above shall have effect as if during any period for which the patient was liable to be detained or subject to guardianship under the order, he had been detained in custody as mentioned in that section.
  • (6) Where—
  • (a) a patient admitted to a hospital in pursuance of a hospital order is absent without leave;
  • (b) a warrant to arrest him has been issued under section 72 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967; and
  • (c) he is held pursuant to the warrant in any country or territory other than the United Kingdom, any of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man,

he shall be treated as having been taken into custody under section 18 above on first being so held.

Restriction orders

Power of higher courts to restrict discharge from hospital

41
  • (1) Where a hospital order is made in respect of an offender by the Crown Court, and it appears to the court, having regard to the nature of the offence, the antecedents of the offender and the risk of his committing further offences if set at large, that it is necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm so to do, the court may, subject to the provisions of this section, further order that the offender shall be subject to the special restrictions set out in this section . . . ; and an order under this section shall be known as “a restriction order”.
  • (2) A restriction order shall not be made in the case of any person unless at least one of the registered medical practitioners whose evidence is taken into account by the court under section 37(2)(a) above has given evidence orally before the court.
  • (3) The special restrictions applicable to a patient in respect of whom a restriction order is in force are as follows—
  • (a) none of the provisions of Part II of this Act relating to the duration, renewal and expiration of authority for the detention of patients shall apply, and the patient shall continue to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order until he is duly discharged under the said Part II or absolutely discharged under section 42, 73, 74 or 75 below;
  • (aa) none of the provisions of Part II of this Act relating to community treatment orders and community patients shall apply;
  • (b) no application shall be made to the appropriate tribunal in respect of a patient under section 66 or 69(1) below;
  • (c) the following powers shall be exercisable only with the consent of the Secretary of State, namely—
  • (i) power to grant leave of absence to the patient under section 17 above;
  • (ii) power to transfer the patient in pursuance of regulations under section 19 above or in pursuance of subsection 3 of that section; and
  • (iii) power to order the discharge of the patient under section 23 above;

and if leave of absence is granted under the said section 17 power to recall the patient under that section shall vest in the Secretary of State as well as the responsible clinician ; and

  • (d) the power of the Secretary of State to recall the patient under the said section 17 and power to take the patient into custody and return him under section 18 above may be exercised at any time;

and in relation to any such patient section 40(4) above shall have effect as if it referred to Part II of Schedule 1 to this Act instead of Part I of that Schedule.

  • (4) A hospital order shall not cease to have effect under section 40(5) above if a restriction order in respect of the patient is in force at the material time.
  • (5) Where a restriction order in respect of a patient ceases to have effect while the relevant hospital order continues in force, the provisions of section 40 above and Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act shall apply to the patient as if he had been admitted to the hospital in pursuance of a hospital order (without a restriction order) made on the date on which the restriction order ceased to have effect.
  • (6) While a person is subject to a restriction order the responsible clinician shall at such intervals (not exceeding one year) as the Secretary of State may direct examine and report to the Secretary of State on that person; and every report shall contain such particulars as the Secretary of State may require.

Powers of Secretary of State in respect of patients subject to restriction orders

42
  • (1) If the Secretary of State is satisfied that in the case of any patient a restriction order is no longer required for the protection of the public from serious harm, he may direct that the patient shall cease to be subject to the special restrictions set out in section 41(3) above; and where the Secretary of State so directs, the restriction order shall cease to have effect, and section 41(5) above shall apply accordingly.
  • (2) At any time while a restriction order is in force in respect of a patient, the Secretary of State may, if he thinks fit, by warrant discharge the patient from hospital, either absolutely or subject to conditions; and where a person is absolutely discharged under this subsection, he shall thereupon cease to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order, and the restriction order shall cease to have effect accordingly.
  • (2A) Conditions amounting to a deprivation of a patient’s liberty may be imposed under subsection (2) if the Secretary of State is satisfied that those conditions are necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm.
  • (3) The Secretary of State may at any time during the continuance in force of a restriction order in respect of a patient who has been conditionally discharged under subsection (2) above by warrant recall the patient to such hospital as may be specified in the warrant.
  • (4) Where a patient is recalled as mentioned in subsection (3) above—
  • (a) if the hospital specified in the warrant is not the hospital from which the patient was conditionally discharged, the hospital order and the restriction order shall have effect as if the hospital specified in the warrant were substituted for the hospital specified in the hospital order;
  • (b) in any case, the patient shall be treated for the purposes of section 18 above as if he had absented himself without leave from the hospital specified in the warrant . . . .
  • (5) If a restriction order in respect of a patient ceases to have effect after the patient has been conditionally discharged under this section, the patient shall, unless previously recalled under subsection (3) above, be deemed to be absolutely discharged on the date when the order ceases to have effect, and shall cease to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order accordingly.
  • (6) The Secretary of State may, if satisfied that the attendance at any place in Great Britain of a patient who is subject to a restriction order is desirable in the interests of justice or for the purposes of any public inquiry, direct him to be taken to that place; and where a patient is directed under this subsection to be taken to any place he shall, unless the Secretary of State otherwise directs, be kept in custody while being so taken, while at that place and while being taken back to the hospital in which he is liable to be detained.

Power of magistrates' courts to commit for restriction order

43
  • (1) If in the case of a person of or over the age of 14 years who is convicted by a magistrates’ court of an offence punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment—
  • (a) the conditions which under section 37(1) above are required to be satisfied for the making of a hospital order are satisfied in respect of the offender; but
  • (b) it appears to the court, having regard to the nature of the offence, the antecedents of the offender and the risk of his committing further offences if set at large, that if a hospital order is made a restriction order should also be made,

the court may, instead of making a hospital order or dealing with him in any other manner, commit him in custody to the Crown Court to be dealt with in respect of the offence.

  • (2) Where an offender is committed to the Crown Court under this section, the Crown Court shall inquire into the circumstances of the case and may—
  • (a) if that court would have power so to do under the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Act upon the conviction of the offender before that court of such an offence as is described in section 37(1) above, make a hospital order in his case, with or without a restriction order;
  • (b) if the court does not make such an order, deal with the offender in any other manner in which the magistrates’ court might have dealt with him.
  • (3) The Crown Court shall have the same power to make orders under sections 35, 36 and 38 above in the case of a person committed to the court under this section as the Crown Court has under those sections in the case of an accused person within the meaning of section 35 or 36 above or of a person convicted before that court as mentioned in section 38 above.
  • (4) The powers of a magistrates' court under section 14 , 16 or 16A of the Sentencing Code (which enable such a court to commit an offender to the Crown Court where the court is of the opinion, or it appears to the court, as mentioned in the section in question) shall also be exercisable by a magistrates' court where it is of that opinion (or it so appears to it) unless a hospital order is made in the offender’s case with a restriction order.
  • (5) The power of the Crown Court to make a hospital order, with or without a restriction order, in the case of a person convicted before that court of an offence may, in the same circumstances and subject to the same conditions, be exercised by such a court in the case of a person committed to the court under section 5 of the Vagrancy Act 1824 (which provides for the committal to the Crown Court of persons who are incorrigible rogues within the meaning of that section).

Committal to hospital under s. 43

44
  • (1) Where an offender is committed under section 43(1) above and the magistrates’ court by which he is committed is satisfied on written or oral evidence that arrangements have been made for the admission of the offender to a hospital in the event of an order being made under this section, the court may, instead of committing him in custody, by order direct him to be admitted to that hospital, specifying it, and to be detained there until the case is disposed of by the Crown Court, and may give such directions as it thinks fit for this production from the hospital to attend the Crown Court by which his case is to be dealt with.
  • (2) The evidence required by subsection (1) above shall be given by the approved clinician who would have overall responsibility for the offender's case or by some other person representing the managers of the hospital in question.
  • (3) The power to give directions under section 37(4) above, section 37(5) above and section 40(1) above shall apply in relation to an order under this section as they apply in relation to a hospital order, but as if references to the period of 28 days mentioned in section 40(1) above were omitted; and subject as aforesaid an order under this section shall, until the offender’s case is disposed of by the Crown Court, have the same effect as a hospital order together with a restriction order . . . .

Appeals from magistrates' courts

45
  • (1) Where on the trial of an information charging a person with an offence a magistrates’ court makes a hospital order or guardianship order in respect of him without convicting him, he shall have the same right of appeal against the order as if it had been made on his conviction; and on any such appeal the Crown Court shall have the same powers as if the appeal had been against both conviction and sentence.
  • (2) An appeal by a child or young person with respect to whom any such order has been made, whether the appeal is against the order or against the finding upon which the order was made, may be brought by him or by his parent or guardian on his behalf.

Detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure

Persons ordered to be kept in custody during Her Majesty's pleasure

46

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Transfer to hospital of prisoners, etc.

Removal to hospital of persons serving sentences of imprisonment, etc.

47
  • (1) If in the case of a person serving a sentence of imprisonment the Secretary of State is satisfied, by reports from at least two registered medical practitioners—
  • (a) that the said person is suffering from mental disorder; and
  • (b) that the mental disorder from which that person is suffering is of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to be detained in a hospital for medical treatment; and
  • (c) that appropriate medical treatment is available for him;

the Secretary of State may, if he is of the opinion having regard to the public interest and all the circumstances that it is expedient so to do, by warrant direct that that person be removed to and detained in such hospital. . . as may be specified in the direction; and a direction under this section shall be known as “a transfer direction”.

  • (2) A transfer direction shall cease to have effect at the expiration of the period of 14 days beginning with the date on which it is given unless within that period the person with respect to whom it was given has been received into the hospital specified in the direction.
  • (3) A transfer direction with respect to any person shall have the same effect as a hospital order made in his case.
  • (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (5) References in this Part of this Act to a person serving a sentence of imprisonment include references—
  • (a) to a person detained in pursuance of any sentence or order for detention made by a court in criminal proceedings or service disciplinary proceedings(other than an order made in consequence of a finding of insanity or unfitness to stand trialor a sentence of service detention within the meaning of the Armed Forces Act 2006);
  • (b) to a person committed to custody under section 115(3) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (which relates to persons who fail to comply with an order to enter into recognisances to keep the peace or be of good behaviour); and
  • (c) to a person committed by a court to a prison or other institution to which the Prison Act 1952 applies in default of payment of any sum adjudged to be paid on his conviction.
  • (6) In subsection (5)(a) “service disciplinary proceedings” means proceedings in respect of a service offence within the meaning of the Armed Forces Act 2006.

Removal to hospital of other prisoners

48
  • (1) If in the case of a person to whom this section applies the Secretary of State is satisfied by the same reports as are required for the purposes of section 47 above that
  • (a) that person is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to be detained in a hospital for medical treatment; and
  • (b) he is in urgent need of such treatment; and
  • (c) appropriate medical treatment is available for him;

the Secretary of State shall have the same power of giving a transfer direction in respect of him under that section as if he were serving a sentence of imprisonment.

  • (2) This section applies to the following persons, that is to say—
  • (a) persons detained in a prison or remanded to youth detention accommodation under section 91 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, not being persons serving a sentence of imprisonment or persons falling within the following paragraphs of this subsection;
  • (b) persons remanded in custody by a magistrates’ court;
  • (c) civil prisoners, that is to say, persons committed by a court to prison for a limited term ..., who are not persons falling to be dealt with under section 47 above;
  • (d) persons detained under—
  • (i) the Immigration Act 1971,
  • (ii) section 62 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (detention by Secretary of State),
  • (iii) section 36 of the UK Borders Act 2007 (detention of offenders for deportation), or
  • (iv) regulation 32 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (S.I. 2016/1052) (which are saved by the Citizens’ Rights (Restrictions of Rights of Entry and Residence) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 (S.I. 2020/1210)).
  • (3) Subsections (2) and (3) of section 47 above shall apply for the purposes of this section and of any transfer direction given by virtue of this section as they apply for the purposes of that section and of any transfer direction under that section.

Restriction on discharge of prisoners removed to hospital

49
  • (1) Where a transfer direction is given in respect of any person, the Secretary of State, if he thinks fit, may by warrant further direct that that person shall be subject to the special restrictions set out in section 41 above; and where the Secretary of State gives a transfer direction in respect of any such person as is described in paragraph (a) or (b) of section 48(2) above, he shall also give a direction under this section applying those restrictions to him.
  • (2) A direction under this section shall have the same effect as a restriction order made under section 41 above and shall be known as “a restriction direction”.
  • (3) While a person is subject to a restriction direction the responsible clinician shall at such intervals (not exceeding one year) as the Secretary of State may direct examine and report to the Secretary of State on that person; and every report shall contain such particulars as the Secretary of State may require.

Further provisions as to prisoners under sentence

50
  • (1) Where a transfer direction and a restriction direction have been given in respect of a person serving a sentence of imprisonment and before his release date the Secretary of State is notified by the responsible clinician , any other approved clinician or the appropriate tribunal that that person no longer requires treatment in hospital for mental disorder or that no effective treatment for his disorder can be given in the hospital to which he has been removed, the Secretary of State may—
  • (a) by warrant direct that he be remitted to any prison or other institution in which he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, there to be dealt with as if he had not been so removed; or
  • (b) exercise any power of releasing him on licence or discharging him under supervision which would have been exercisable if he had been remitted to such a prison or institution as aforesaid,

and on his arrival in the prison or other institution or, as the case may be, his release or discharge as aforesaid, the transfer direction and the restriction direction shall cease to have effect.

  • (2) A restriction direction in the case of a person serving a sentence of imprisonment shall cease to have effect, if it has not previously done so, on his release date.
  • (3) In this section, references to a person’s release date are to the day (if any) on which he would be entitled to be released (whether unconditionally or on licence) from any prison or other institution in which he might have been detained if the transfer direction had not been given; and in determining that day there shall be disregarded—
  • (a) any powers that would be exercisable by the Parole Board if he were detained in such a prison or other institution, and
  • (b) any practice of the Secretary of State in relation to the early release under discretionary powers of persons detained in such a prison or other institution.
  • (4) For the purposes of section 49(2) of the Prison Act 1952 (which provides for discounting from the sentences of certain prisoners periods while they are unlawfully at large) a patient who, having been transferred in pursuance of a transfer direction from any such institution as is referred to in that section, is at large in circumstances in which he is liable to be taken into custody under any provision of this Act, shall be treated as unlawfully at large and absent from that institution.
  • (5) The preceding provisions of this section shall have effect as if—
  • (a) the reference in subsection (1) to a transfer direction and a restriction direction having been given in respect of a person serving a sentence of imprisonment included a reference to a hospital direction and a limitation direction having been given in respect of a person sentenced to imprisonment;
  • (b) the reference in subsection (2) to a restriction direction included a reference to a limitation direction; and
  • (c) references in subsections (3) and (4) to a transfer direction included references to a hospital direction.

Further provisions as to detained persons

51
  • (1) This section has effect where a transfer direction has been given in respect of any such person as is described in paragraph (a) of section 48(2) above and that person is in this section referred to as “the detainee”.
  • (2) The transfer direction shall cease to have effect when the detainee’s case is disposed of by the court having jurisdiction to try or otherwise deal with him, but without prejudice to any power of that court to make a hospital order or other order under this Part of this Act in his case.
  • (3) If the Secretary of State is notified by the responsible clinician , any other approved clinician or the appropriate tribunal at any time before the detainee’s case is disposed of by that court—
  • (a) that the detainee no longer requires treatment in hospital for mental disorder; or
  • (b) that no effective treatment for his disorder can be given at the hospital to which he has been removed,

the Secretary of State may by warrant direct that he be remitted to any place where he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, there to be dealt with as if he had not been so removed, and on his arrival at the place to which he is so remitted the transfer direction shall cease to have effect.

  • (4) If (no direction having been given under subsection (3) above) the court having jurisdiction to try or otherwise deal with the detainee is satisfied on the written or oral evidence of the responsible clinician—
  • (a) that the detainee no longer requires treatment in hospital for mental disorder; or
  • (b) that no effective treatment for his disorder can be given at the hospital to which he has been removed,

the court may order him to be remitted to any such place as is mentioned in subsection (3) above or , subject to section 25 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, released on bail and on his arrival at that place or, as the case may be, his release on bail the transfer direction shall cease to have effect.

  • (5) If (no direction or order having been given or made under subsection (3) or (4) above) it appears to the court having jurisdiction to try or otherwise deal with the detainee—
  • (a) that it is impracticable or inappropriate to bring the detainee before the court; and
  • (b) that the conditions set out in subsection (6) below are satisfied,

the court may make a hospital order (with or without a restriction order) in his case in his absence and, in the case of a person awaiting trial, without convicting him.

  • (6) A hospital order may be made in respect of a person under subsection (5) above if the court—
  • (a) is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of at least two registered medical practitioners, that
  • (i) the detainee is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for the patient to be detained in a hospital for medical treatment; and
  • (ii) appropriate medical treatment is available for him; and
  • (b) is of the opinion, after considering any depositions or other documents required to be sent to the proper officer of the court, that it is proper to make such an order.
  • (7) Where a person committed to the Crown Court to be dealt with under section 43 above is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an order under section 44 above, subsections (5) and (6) above shall apply as if he were a person subject to a transfer direction.

Further provisions as to persons remanded by magistrates' courts

52
  • (1) This section has effect where a transfer direction has been given in respect of any such person as is described in paragraph (b) of section 48(2) above; and that person is in this section referred to as “the accused”.
  • (2) Subject to subsection (5) below, the transfer direction shall cease to have effect on the expiration of the period of remand unless the accused is sent in custody to the Crown Court for trial or to be otherwise dealt with.
  • (3) Subject to subsection (4) below, the power of further remanding the accused under section 128 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 may be exercised by the court without his being brought before the court; and if the court further remands the accused in custody (whether or not he is brought before the court) the period of remand shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed not to have expired.
  • (4) The court shall not under subsection (3) above further remand the accused in his absence unless he has appeared before the court within the previous six months.
  • (5) If the magistrates’ court is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of the responsible clinician—
  • (a) that the accused no longer requires treatment in hospital for mental disorder; or
  • (b) that no effective treatment for his disorder can be given in the hospital to which he has been removed,

the court may direct that the transfer direction shall cease to have effect notwithstanding that the period of remand has not expired or that the accused is sent to the Crown Court as mentioned in subsection (2) above.

  • (6) If the accused is sent to the Crown Court as mentioned in subsection (2) above and the transfer direction has not ceased to have effect under subsection (5) above, section 51 above shall apply as if the transfer direction given in his case were a direction given in respect of a person falling within that section.
  • (7) The magistrates’ court may, in the absence of the accused, send him to the Crown Court for trial under section 51 or 51A of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 if—
  • (a) the court is satisfied, on the written or oral evidence of the responsible clinician , that the accused is unfit to take part in the proceedings; and
  • (b) ... the accused is represented by an authorised person.

Further provisions as to civil prisoners and persons detained under the Immigration Act 1971

53
  • (1) Subject to subsection (2) below, a transfer direction given in respect of any such person as is described in paragraph (c) or (d) of section 48(2) above shall cease to have effect on the expiration of the period during which he would, but for his removal to hospital, be liable to be detained in the place from which he was removed.
  • (2) Where a transfer direction and a restriction direction have been given in respect of any such person as is mentioned in subsection (1) above, then, if the Secretary of State is notified by the responsible clinician , any other approved clinician or the appropriate tribunal at any time before the expiration of the period there mentioned—
  • (a) that that person no longer requires treatment in hospital for mental disorder; or
  • (b) that no effective treatment for his disorder can be given in the hospital to which he has been removed,

the Secretary of State may by warrant direct that he be remitted to any place where he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, and on his arrival at the place to which he is so remitted the transfer direction and the restriction direction shall cease to have effect.

Supplemental

Requirements as to medical evidence

54
  • (1) The registered medical practitioner whose evidence is taken into account under section 35(3)(a) above and at least one of the registered medical practitioners whose evidence is taken into account under sections 36(1), 37(2)(a), 38(1) 45A(2) and 51(6)(a) above and whose reports are taken into account under sections 47(1) and 48(1) above shall be a practitioner approved for the purposes of section 12 above by the Secretary of State , or by another person by virtue of section 12ZA or 12ZB above, as having special experience in the diagnosis or treatment of mental disorder.
  • (2) For the purposes of any provision of this Part of this Act under which a court may act on the written evidence of any person, a report in writing purporting to be signed by that person may, subject to the provisions of this section, be received in evidence without proof of the following—
  • (a) the signature of the person; or
  • (b) his having the requisite qualifications or approval or authority or being of the requisite description to give the report.
  • (2A) But the court may require the signatory of any such report to be called to give oral evidence.
  • (3) Where, in pursuance of a direction of the court, any such report is tendered in evidence otherwise than by or on behalf of the person who is the subject of the report, then—
  • (a) if that person is represented by an authorised person , a copy of the report shall be given to that authorised person ;
  • (b) if that person is not so represented, the substance of the report shall be disclosed to him or, where he is a child or young person, to his parent or guardian if present in court; and
  • (c) except where the report relates only to arrangements for his admission to a hospital, that person may require the signatory of the report to be called to give oral evidence, and evidence to rebut the evidence contained in the report may be called by or on behalf of that person.

Interpretation of Part III

55
  • (1) In this Part of this Act—
  • authorised person” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience (within the meaning of that Act);
  • child” and “young person” have the same meaning as in the Children and Young Persons Act 1933;
  • civil prisoner” has the meaning given to it by section 48(2)(c) above;
  • guardian”, in relation to a child or young person, has the same meaning as in the Children and Young Persons Act 1933;
  • place of safety”, in relation to a person who is not a child or young person, means any police station, prison or remand centre, or any hospital the managers of which are willing temporarily to receive him, and in relation to a child or young person has the same meaning as in the Children and Young Persons Act 1933;
  • responsible clinician”, in relation to a person liable to be detained in a hospital within the meaning of Part 2 of this Act, means the approved clinician with overall responsibility for the patient's case.
  • (2) Any reference in this Part of this Act to an offence punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment shall be construed without regard to any prohibition or restriction imposed by or under any enactment relating to the imprisonment of young offenders.
  • (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (4) Any reference to a hospital order, a guardianship order or a restriction order in section 40(2), (4) or (5), section 41(3) to (5), or section 42 above or section 69(1) below shall be construed as including a reference to any order or direction under this Part of this Act having the same effect as the first-mentioned order; and the exceptions and modifications set out in Schedule 1 to this Act in respect of the provisions of this Act described in that Schedule accordingly include those which are consequential on the provisions of this subsection.
  • (5) Section 34(2) above shall apply for the purposes of this Part of this Act as it applies for the purposes of Part II of this Act.
  • (6) References in this Part of this Act to persons serving a sentence of imprisonment shall be construed in accordance with section 47(5) above.
  • (7) Section 99 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (which relates to the presumption and determination of age) shall apply for the purposes of this Part of this Act as it applies for the purposes of that Act.

Patients to whom Part IV applies

56
  • (1) Section 57 and, so far as relevant to that section, sections 59 to 62 below apply to any patient.
  • (2) Subject to that and to subsection (5) below, this Part of this Act applies to a patient only if he falls within subsection (3) or (4) below.
  • (3) A patient falls within this subsection if he is liable to be detained under this Act but not if—
  • (a) he is so liable by virtue of an emergency application and the second medical recommendation referred to in section 4(4)(a) above has not been given and received;
  • (b) he is so liable by virtue of section 5(2) or (4) or 35 above or section 135 or 136 below or by virtue of a direction for his detention in a place of safety under section 37(4) or 45A(5) above; or
  • (c) he has been conditionally discharged under section 42(2) above or section 73 or 74 below and he is not recalled to hospital.
  • (4) A patient falls within this subsection if—
  • (a) he is a community patient; and
  • (b) he is recalled to hospital under section 17E above.
  • (5) Section 58A and, so far as relevant to that section, sections 59 to 62 below also apply to any patient who—
  • (a) does not fall within subsection (3) above;
  • (b) is not a community patient; and
  • (c) has not attained the age of 18 years.
57
  • (1) This section applies to the following forms of medical treatment for mental disorder—
  • (a) any surgical operation for destroying brain tissue or for destroying the functioning of brain tissue; and
  • (b) such other forms of treatment as may be specified for the purposes of this section by regulations made by the Secretary of State.
  • (2) Subject to section 62 below, a patient shall not be given any form of treatment to which this section applies unless he has consented to it and—
  • (a) a registered medical practitioner appointed for the purposes of this Part of this Act by the regulatory authority(not being the responsible clinician (if there is one) or the person in charge of the treatment in question) and two other persons appointed for the purposes of this paragraph by the regulatory authority(not being registered medical practitioners) have certified in writing that the patient is capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment in question and has consented to it; and
  • (b) the registered medical practitioner referred to in paragraph (a) above has certified in writing that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given.
  • (3) Before giving a certificate under subsection (2)(b) above the registered medical practitioner concerned shall consult two other persons who have been professionally concerned with the patient’s medical treatment but, of those persons—
  • (a) one shall be a nurse and the other shall be neither a nurse nor a registered medical practitioner; and
  • (b) neither shall be the responsible clinician (if there is one) or the person in charge of the treatment in question.
  • (4) Before making any regulations for the purpose of this section the Secretary of State shall consult such bodies as appear to him to be concerned.
58
  • (1) This section applies to the following forms of medical treatment for mental disorder—
  • (a) such forms of treatment as may be specified for the purposes of this section by regulations made by the Secretary of State;
  • (b) the administration of medicine to a patient by any means (not being a form of treatment specified under paragraph (a) above or section 57 above or section 58A(1)(b) below) at any time during a period for which he is liable to be detained as a patient to whom this Part of this Act applies if three months or more have elapsed since the first occasion in that period when medicine was administered to him by any means for his mental disorder.
  • (2) The Secretary of State may by order vary the length of the period mentioned in subsection (1)(b) above.
  • (3) Subject to section 62 below, a patient shall not be given any form of treatment to which this section applies unless—
  • (a) he has consented to that treatment and either the approved clinician in charge of it or a registered medical practitioner appointed for the purposes of this Part of this Act by the regulatory authority has certified in writing that the patient is capable of understanding its nature, purpose and likely effects and has consented to it; or
  • (b) a registered medical practitioner appointed as aforesaid (not being the responsible clinician or the approved clinician in charge of the treatment in question) has certified in writing that the patient is not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of that treatment or being so capable has not consented to it but that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given.
  • (4) Before giving a certificate under subsection (3)(b) above the registered medical practitioner concerned shall consult two other persons who have been professionally concerned with the patient’s medical treatment but, of those persons—
  • (a) one shall be a nurse and the other shall be neither a nurse nor a registered medical practitioner; and
  • (b) neither shall be the responsible clinician or the approved clinician in charge of the treatment in question.
  • (5) Before making any regulations for the purposes of this section the Secretary of State shall consult such bodies as appear to him to be concerned.

Plans of treatment

59

Any consent or certificate under section 57 , 58 or 58A above may relate to a plan of treatment under which the patient is to be given (whether within a specified period or otherwise) one or more of the forms of treatment to which that section applies.

60
  • (1) Where the consent of a patient to any treatment has been given for the purposes of section 57 , 58 or 58A above, the patient may, subject to section 62 below, at any time before the completion of the treatment withdraw his consent, and those sections shall then apply as if the remainder of the treatment were a separate form of treatment.
  • (1A) Subsection (1B) below applies where—
  • (a) the consent of a patient to any treatment has been given for the purposes of section 57, 58 or 58A above; but
  • (b) before the completion of the treatment, the patient ceases to be capable of understanding its nature, purpose and likely effects.
  • (1B) The patient shall, subject to section 62 below, be treated as having withdrawn his consent, and those sections shall then apply as if the remainder of the treatment were a separate form of treatment.
  • (1C) Subsection (1D) below applies where—
  • (a) a certificate has been given under section 58 or 58A above that a patient is not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment to which the certificate applies; but
  • (b) before the completion of the treatment, the patient becomes capable of understanding its nature, purpose and likely effects.
  • (1D) The certificate shall, subject to section 62 below, cease to apply to the treatment and those sections shall then apply as if the remainder of the treatment were a separate form of treatment.
  • (2) Without prejudice to the application of subsections (1) to (1D) above to any treatment given under the plan of treatment to which a patient has consented, a patient who has consented to such a plan may, subject to section 62 below, at any time withdraw his consent to further treatment, or to further treatment of any description, under the plan.

Review of treatment

61
  • (1) Where a patient is given treatment in accordance with section 57(2) , 58(3)(b) or 58A(4) or (5) above , or by virtue of section 62A below in accordance with a Part 4A certificate (within the meaning of that section) that falls within section 64C(4) below, a report on the treatment and the patient’s condition shall be given by the approved clinician in charge of the treatment to the regulatory authority—
  • (a) on the next occasion on which the responsible clinician furnishes a report under section 20(3) , 20A(4) or 21B(2) above in respect of the patient; and
  • (b) at any other time if so required by the regulatory authority.
  • (2) In relation to a patient who is subject to a restriction order , limitation directionor restriction direction subsection (1) above shall have effect as if paragraph (a) required the report to be made—
  • (a) in the case of treatment in the period of six months beginning with the date of the order or direction, at the end of that period;
  • (b) in the case of treatment at any subsequent time, on the next occasion on which the responsible clinician makes a report in respect of the patient under section 41(6) , 45B(3) or 49(3) above.
  • (3) The regulatory authority may at any time give notice . . . directing that, subject to section 62 below, a certificate given in respect of a patient under subsection 57(2) , 58(3)(b) or 58A(4) or (5) above shall not apply to treatment given to him (whether in England or Wales) after a date specified in the notice and sections 57 , 58 and 58A above shall then apply to any such treatment as if that certificate has not been given.
  • (3A) The notice under subsection (3) above shall be given to the approved clinician in charge of the treatment.

Urgent treatment

62
  • (1) Sections 57 and 58 above shall not apply to any treatment—
  • (a) which is immediately necessary to save the patient’s life;
  • (b) which (not being irreversible) is immediately necessary to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition; or
  • (c) which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary to alleviate serious suffering by the patient; or
  • (d) which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary and represents the minimum interference necessary to prevent the patient from behaving violently or being a danger to himself or to others.
  • (1A) Section 58A above, in so far as it relates to electro-convulsive therapy by virtue of subsection (1)(a) of that section, shall not apply to any treatment which falls within paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1) above.
  • (1B) Section 58A above, in so far as it relates to a form of treatment specified by virtue of subsection (1)(b) of that section, shall not apply to any treatment which falls within such of paragraphs (a) to (d) of subsection (1) above as may be specified in regulations under that section.
  • (1C) For the purposes of subsection (1B) above, the regulations—
  • (a) may make different provision for different cases (and may, in particular, make different provision for different forms of treatment);
  • (b) may make provision which applies subject to specified exceptions; and
  • (c) may include transitional, consequential, incidental or supplemental provision.
  • (2) Sections 60 and 61(3) above shall not preclude the continuation of any treatment or of treatment under any plan pending compliance with section 57 , 58 or 58A above if the approved clinician in charge of the treatment considers that the discontinuance of the treatment or of treatment under the plan would cause serious suffering to the patient.
  • (3) For the purposes of this section treatment is irreversible if it has unfavourable irreversible physical or psychological consequences and hazardous if it entails significant physical hazard.
63

The consent of a patient shall not be required for any medical treatment given to him for the mental disorder from which he is suffering , not being a form of treatment to which section 57, 58 or 58A above applies, if the treatment is given by or under the direction of the approved clinician in charge of the treatment .

Supplementary provisions for Part IV

64
  • (1) In this Part of this Act “the responsible clinician” means the approved clinician with overall responsibility for the case of the patient in question and “hospital” includes a registered establishment.
  • (1A) References in this Part of this Act to the approved clinician in charge of a patient's treatment shall, where the treatment in question is a form of treatment to which section 57 above applies, be construed as references to the person in charge of the treatment.
  • (1B) References in this Part of this Act to the approved clinician in charge of a patient's treatment shall, where the treatment in question is a form of treatment to which section 58A above applies and the patient falls within section 56(5) above, be construed as references to the person in charge of the treatment.
  • (1C) Regulations made by virtue of section 32(2)(d) above apply for the purposes of this Part as they apply for the purposes of Part 2 of this Act.
  • (2) Any certificate for the purposes of this Part of this Act shall be in such form as may be prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State.
  • (3) For the purposes of this Part of this Act, it is appropriate for treatment to be given to a patient if the treatment is appropriate in his case, taking into account the nature and degree of the mental disorder from which he is suffering and all other circumstances of his case.

Part V — Mental Health Review Tribunals

Constitution etc.

Mental Health Review Tribunals

65
  • (1) There shall be a Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales.
  • (1A) The purpose of that tribunal is to deal with applications and references by and in respect of patients under the provisions of this Act.
  • (2) The provisions of Schedule 2 to this Act shall have effect with respect to the constitution of the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales.
  • (3) Subject to the provisions of Schedule 2 to this Act, and to rules made by the Lord Chancellor under this Act, the jurisdiction of the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales may be exercised by any three or more of its members, and references in this Act to the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales shall be construed accordingly.
  • (4) The Welsh Ministers may pay to the members of the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales such remuneration and allowances as they may determine, and defray the expenses of that tribunal to such amount as they may determine, and may provide for that tribunal such officers and servants, and such accommodation, as that tribunal may require.

Applications and references concerning Part II patients

Applications to tribunals

66
  • (1) Where—
  • (a) a patient is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment; or
  • (b) a patient is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment; or
  • (c) a patient is received into guardianship in pursuance of a guardianship application; or
  • (ca) a community treatment order is made in respect of a patient; or
  • (cb) a community treatment order is revoked under section 17F above in respect of a patient; or
  • (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (e) a patient is transferred from guardianship to a hospital in pursuance of regulations made under section 19 above; or
  • (f) a report is furnished under section 20 above in respect of a patient and the patient is not discharged under section 23 above ; or
  • (fza) a report is furnished under section 20A above in respect of a patient and the patient is not discharged under section 23 above; or
  • (fa) a report is furnished under subsection (2) of section 21B above in respect of a patient and subsection (5) of that section applies (or subsections (5) and (6)(b) of that section apply) in the case of the report; or
  • (faa) a report is furnished under subsection (2) of section 21B above in respect of a community patient and subsection (6A) of that section applies (or subsections (6A) and (6B)(b) of that section apply) in the case of the report; or
  • (fb) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (g) a report is furnished under section 25 above in respect of a patient who is detained in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment or a community patient ; or
  • (ga) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (gb) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (gc) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (h) an order is made under section 29 above on the ground specified in paragraph (c) or (d) of subsection (3) of that section in respect of a patient who is or subsequently becomes liable to be detained or subject to guardianship under Part II of this Act or who is a community patient ,

an application may be made to the appropriate tribunal within the relevant period—

  • (i) by the patient (except in the cases mentioned in paragraphs (g) and (h) above . . .
  • (ii) in the cases mentioned in paragraphs (g) and (h) above, by his nearest relative.
  • (2) In subsection (1) above “the relevant period” means—
  • (a) in the case mentioned in paragraph (a) of that subsection, 14 days beginning with the day on which the patient is admitted as so mentioned;
  • (b) in the case mentioned in paragraph (b) of that subsection, six months beginning with the day on which the patient is admitted as so mentioned;
  • (c) in the case mentioned in paragraph (c) of that subsection, six months beginning with the day on which the application is accepted;
  • (ca) in the case mentioned in paragraph (ca) of that subsection, six months beginning with the day on which the community treatment order is made;
  • (cb) in the case mentioned in paragraph (cb) of that subsection, six months beginning with the day on which the community treatment order is revoked;
  • (d) in the case mentioned in paragraph (g). . . of that subsection, 28 days beginning with the day on which the applicant is informed that the report has been furnished;
  • (e) in the case mentioned in paragraph (e) of that subsection, six months beginning with the day on which the patient is transferred;
  • (f) in the case mentioned in paragraph (f) or (fa) of that subsection, the period or periods for which authority for the patient’s detention or guardianship is renewed by virtue of the report;
  • (fza) in the cases mentioned in paragraphs (fza) and (faa) of that subsection, the period or periods for which the community treatment period is extended by virtue of the report;
  • (fa) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (g) in the case mentioned in paragraph (h) of that subsection, 12 months beginning with the date of the order, and in any subsequent period of 12 months during which the order continues in force.
  • (2A) Nothing in subsection (1)(b) above entitles a community patient to make an application by virtue of that provision even if he is admitted to a hospital on being recalled there under section 17E above.
  • (3) Section 32 above shall apply for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of Part II of this Act.
  • (4) In this Act “the appropriate tribunal” means the First-tier Tribunal or the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales.
  • (5) For provision determining to which of those tribunals applications by or in respect of a patient under this Act shall be made, see section 77(3) and (4) below.

References to tribunals by Secretary of State concerning Part II patients

67
  • (1) The Secretary of State may, if he thinks fit, at any time refer to the appropriate tribunal the case of any patient who is liable to be detained or subject to guardianship . . . under Part II of this Act or of any community patient .
  • (2) For the purpose of furnishing information for the purposes of a reference under subsection (1) above any registered medical practitioner or approved clinician authorised by or on behalf of the patient may, at any reasonable time, visit the patient and examine him in private and require the production of and inspect any records relating to the detention or treatment of the patient in any hospital or to any after-care services provided for the patient under section 117 below.
  • (3) Section 32 above shall apply for the purposes of this section as it applies for the purposes of Part II of this Act.

Duty of managers of hospitals to refer cases to tribunal

68
  • (1) This section applies in respect of the following patients—
  • (a) a patient who is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment;
  • (b) a patient who is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment;
  • (c) a community patient;
  • (d) a patient whose community treatment order is revoked under section 17F above;
  • (e) a patient who is transferred from guardianship to a hospital in pursuance of regulations made under section 19 above.
  • (2) On expiry of the period of six months beginning with the applicable day, the managers of the hospital shall refer the patient's case to the appropriate tribunal.
  • (3) But they shall not do so if during that period—
  • (a) any right has been exercised by or in respect of the patient by virtue of any of paragraphs (b), (ca), (cb), (e), (g) and (h) of section 66(1) above;
  • (b) a reference has been made in respect of the patient under section 67(1) above, not being a reference made while the patient is or was liable to be detained in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment; or
  • (c) a reference has been made in respect of the patient under subsection (7) below.
  • (4) A person who applies to a tribunal but subsequently withdraws his application shall be treated for these purposes as not having exercised his right to apply, and if he withdraws his application on a date after expiry of the period mentioned in subsection (2) above, the managers shall refer the patient's case as soon as possible after that date.
  • (5) In subsection (2) above, “the applicable day” means—
  • (a) in the case of a patient who is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment, the day on which the patient was so admitted;
  • (b) in the case of a patient who is admitted to a hospital in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment—
  • (i) the day on which the patient was so admitted; or
  • (ii) if, when he was so admitted, he was already liable to be detained in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment, the day on which he was originally admitted in pursuance of the application for admission for assessment;
  • (c) in the case of a community patient or a patient whose community treatment order is revoked under section 17F above, the day mentioned in sub-paragraph (i) or (ii), as the case may be, of paragraph (b) above;
  • (d) in the case of a patient who is transferred from guardianship to a hospital, the day on which he was so transferred.
  • (6) The managers of the hospital shall also refer the patient's case to the appropriate tribunal if a period of more than three years (or, if the patient has not attained the age of 18 years, one year) has elapsed since his case was last considered by such a tribunal, whether on his own application or otherwise.
  • (7) If, in the case of a community patient, the community treatment order is revoked under section 17F above, the managers of the hospital shall also refer the patient's case to the appropriate tribunal as soon as possible after the order is revoked.
  • (8) For the purposes of furnishing information for the purposes of a reference under this section, a registered medical practitioner or approved clinician authorised by or on behalf of the patient may at any reasonable time—
  • (a) visit and examine the patient in private; and
  • (b) require the production of and inspect any records relating to the detention or treatment of the patient in any hospital or any after-care services provided for him under section 117 below.
  • (9) Reference in this section to the managers of the hospital—
  • (a) in relation to a community patient, is to the managers of the responsible hospital;
  • (b) in relation to any other patient, is to the managers of the hospital in which he is liable to be detained.

Applications and references concerning Part III patients

Applications to tribunals concerning patients subject to hospital and guardianship orders

69
  • (1) Without prejudice to any provision of section 66(1) above as applied by section 40(4) above, an application to the appropriate tribunal may also be made—
  • (a) in respect of a patient liable to be detained in pursuance of a hospital order or a community patient who was so liable immediately before he became a community patient, by the nearest relative of the patient in any period in which an application may be made by the patient under any such provision as so applied;
  • (b) in respect of a patient placed under guardianship by a guardianship order—
  • (i) by the patient, within the period of six months beginning with the date of the order;
  • (ii) by the nearest relative of the patient, within the period of 12 months beginning with the date of the order and in any subsequent period of 12 months.
  • (2) Where a person detained in a hospital—
  • (a) is treated as subject to a hospital order , hospital direction or transfer direction by virtue of section 41(5) above or section 80B(2), 82(2) or 85(2) below. ; or
  • (b) is subject to a direction having the same effect as a hospital order by virtue of section. . . 47(3) or 48(3) above,

then, without prejudice to any provision of Part II of this Act as applied by section 40 above, that person may make an application to the appropriate tribunal in the period of six months beginning with the date of the order or direction mentioned in paragraph (a) above or, as the case may be, the date of the direction mentioned in paragraph (b) above.

  • (3) The provisions of section 66 above as applied by section 40(4) above are subject to subsection (4) below.
  • (4) If the initial detention period has not elapsed when the relevant application period begins, the right of a hospital order patient to make an application by virtue of paragraph (ca) or (cb) of section 66(1) above shall be exercisable only during whatever remains of the relevant application period after the initial detention period has elapsed.
  • (5) In subsection (4) above—
  • (a) “hospital order patient” means a patient who is subject to a hospital order, excluding a patient of a kind mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (2) above;
  • (b) “the initial detention period”, in relation to a hospital order patient, means the period of six months beginning with the date of the hospital order; and
  • (c) “the relevant application period” means the relevant period mentioned in paragraph (ca) or (cb), as the case may be, of section 66(2) above.

Applications to tribunals concerning restricted patients

70

A patient who is a restricted patient within the meaning of section 79 below and is detained in a hospital may apply to the appropriate tribunal—

  • (a) in the period between the expiration of six months and the expiration of 12 months beginning with the date of the relevant hospital order , hospital direction or transfer direction; and
  • (b) in any subsequent period of 12 months.

References by Secretary of State concerning restricted patients

71
  • (1) The Secretary of State may at any time refer the case of a restricted patient to the appropriate tribunal.
  • (2) The Secretary of State shall refer to the appropriate tribunal the case of any restricted patient detained in a hospital whose case has not been considered by such a tribunal, whether on his own application or otherwise, within the last three years.
  • (3) The Secretary of State may by order vary the length of the period mentioned in subsection (2) above.
  • (3A) An order under subsection (3) above may make—
  • (a) provision subject to specified exceptions,
  • (b) different provision for different cases or areas, and
  • (c) transitional, consequential, incidental or supplemental provision.
  • (4) Any reference under subsection (1) above in respect of a patient who has been conditionally discharged and not recalled to hospital shall be made to the tribunal for the area in which the patient resides.
  • (4A) Sections 73 and 74 do not apply to a reference under subsection (1) in respect of a patient who has been conditionally discharged and not recalled to hospital but on any such reference the tribunal may—
  • (a) vary any condition to which the patient is subject in connection with the patient’s discharge or impose any condition which might have been imposed in connection with their discharge, or
  • (b) direct that the restriction order, limitation direction or restriction direction to which the patient is subject ceases to have effect,

and if the tribunal gives a direction under paragraph (b) the patient ceases to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order, hospital direction or transfer direction.

  • (4B) Conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty may be imposed under subsection (4A)(a) only if the tribunal is satisfied—
  • (a) that conditions amounting to a deprivation of the patient’s liberty are necessary for the protection of another person from serious harm while the patient remains discharged from hospital, and
  • (b) that for the patient to remain discharged subject to those conditions would be no less beneficial to their mental health than for them to be recalled to hospital.
  • (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Discharge of patients

Powers of tribunals

72
  • (1) Where application is made to the appropriate tribunal by or in respect of a patient who is liable to be detained under this Act or is a community patient , the tribunal may in any case direct that the patient be discharged, and—
  • (a) the tribunal shall direct the discharge of a patient liable to be detained under section 2 above if it is not satisfied—
  • (i) that he is then suffering from mental disorder or from mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants his detention in a hospital for assessment (or for assessment followed by medical treatment) for at least a limited period; or
  • (ii) that his detention as aforesaid is justified in the interests of his own health or safety or with a view to the protection of other persons;
  • (b) the tribunal shall direct the discharge of a patient liable to be detained otherwise than under section 2 above if it is not satisfied—
  • (i) that he is then suffering from mental disorder or from mental disorderof a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to be liable to be detained in a hospital for medical treatment; or
  • (ii) that it is necessary for the health of safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment; or
  • (iia) that appropriate medical treatment is available for him; or
  • (iii) in the case of an application by virtue of paragraph (g) of section 66(1) above, that the patient, if released, would be likely to act in a manner dangerous to other persons or to himself.
  • (c) the tribunal shall direct the discharge of a community patient if it is not satisfied—
  • (i) that he is then suffering from mental disorder or mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive medical treatment; or
  • (ii) that it is necessary for his health or safety or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment; or
  • (iii) that it is necessary that the responsible clinician should be able to exercise the power under section 17E(1) above to recall the patient to hospital; or
  • (iv) that appropriate medical treatment is available for him; or
  • (v) in the case of an application by virtue of paragraph (g) of section 66(1) above, that the patient, if discharged, would be likely to act in a manner dangerous to other persons or to himself.
  • (1A) In determining whether the criterion in subsection (1)(c)(iii) above is met, the tribunal shall, in particular, consider, having regard to the patient's history of mental disorder and any other relevant factors, what risk there would be of a deterioration of the patient's condition if he were to continue not to be detained in a hospital (as a result, for example, of his refusing or neglecting to receive the medical treatment he requires for his mental disorder).
  • (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (3) A tribunal may under subsection (1) above direct the discharge of a patient on a future date specified in the direction; and where a tribunal does not direct the discharge of a patient under that subsection the tribunal may—
  • (a) with a view to facilitating his discharge on a future date, recommend that he be granted leave of absence or transferred to another hospital or into guardianship; and
  • (b) further consider his case in the event of any such recommendation not being complied with.
  • (3A) Subsection (1) above does not require a tribunal to direct the discharge of a patient just because it thinks it might be appropriate for the patient to be discharged (subject to the possibility of recall) under a community treatment order; and a tribunal—
  • (a) may recommend that the responsible clinician consider whether to make a community treatment order; and
  • (b) may (but need not) further consider the patient's case if the responsible clinician does not make an order.
  • (4) Where application is made to the appropriate tribunal by or in respect of a patient who is subject to guardianship under this Act, the tribunal may in any case direct that the patient be discharged, and shall so direct if it is satisfied—
  • (a) that he is not then suffering from mental disorder ; or
  • (b) that it is not necessary in the interests of the welfare of the patient, or for the protection of other persons, that the patient should remain under such guardianship.
  • (4A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • (6) Subsections (1) to (4) above apply in relation to references to the appropriate tribunal as they apply in relation to applications made to the appropriate tribunal by or in respect of a patient.
  • (7) Subsection (1) above shall not apply in the case of a restricted patient except as provided in sections 73 and 74 below.

Power to discharge restricted patients

73
  • (1) Where an application to the appropriate tribunal is made by a restricted patient who is subject to a restriction order, or where the case of such a patient is referred to the appropriate tribunal, the tribunal shall direct the absolute discharge of the patient if—
  • (a) the tribunal is not satisfied as to the matters mentioned in paragraph (b)(i) , (ii) or (iia) of section 72(1) above; and
  • (b) the tribunal is satisfied that it is not appropriate for the patient to remain liable to be recalled to hospital for further treatment.
  • (2) Where in the case of any such patient as is mentioned in subsection (1) above—
  • (a) paragraph (a) of that subsection applies; ...
  • (b) paragraph (b) of that subsection does not apply ; and
  • (c) the tribunal—
  • (i) is not satisfied that conditions amounting to a deprivation of the patient’s liberty would be necessary for the protection of another person from serious harm, if the patient were discharged from hospital; or
  • (ii) is satisfied that conditions amounting to a deprivation of the patient’s liberty would be necessary for the protection of another person from serious harm if the patient were discharged from hospital, and is also satisfied that for the patient to be discharged subject to those conditions would be no less beneficial to their mental health than for them to remain in hospital;

the tribunal shall direct the conditional discharge of the patient.

  • (3) Where a patient is absolutely discharged under this section he shall thereupon cease to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order, and the restriction order shall cease to have effect accordingly.
  • (4) Where a patient is conditionally discharged under this section—
  • (a) he may be recalled by the Secretary of State under subsection (3) of section 42 above as if he had been conditionally discharged under subsection (2) of that section; and
  • (b) the patient shall comply with such conditions (if any) as may be imposed at the time of discharge by the tribunal or at any subsequent time by the Secretary of State.
  • (5) The Secretary of State may from time to time vary any condition imposed (whether by the tribunal or by him) under subsection (4) above.
  • (5A) Conditions amounting to a deprivation of a patient’s liberty may be imposed by the tribunal under subsection (4)(b) only where the tribunal is satisfied as to the matters mentioned in subsection (2)(c)(ii).
  • (5B) Conditions amounting to a deprivation of a patient’s liberty may be imposed by the Secretary of State under subsection (4)(b) or (5) only where the Secretary of State is satisfied that those conditions are necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm.
  • (6) Where a restriction order in respect of a patient ceases to have effect after he has been conditionally discharged under this section the patient shall, unless previously recalled, be deemed to be absolutely discharged on the date when the order ceases to have effect and shall cease to be liable to be detained by virtue of the relevant hospital order.
  • (7) A tribunal may defer a direction for the conditional discharge of a patient until such arrangements as appear to the tribunal to be necessary for that purpose have been made to its satisfaction; and where by virtue of any such deferment no direction has been given on an application or reference before the time when the patient’s case comes before the tribunal on a subsequent application or reference, the previous application or reference shall be treated as one on which no direction under this section can be given.
  • (8) This section is without prejudice to section 42 above.

Restricted patients subject to restriction directions

74
  • (1) Where an application to the appropriate tribunal is made by a restricted patient who is subject to a limitation direction or a restriction direction, or where the case of such a patient is referred to the appropriate tribunal, the tribunal—
  • (a) shall notify the Secretary of State whether, in its opinion, the patient would, if subject to a restriction order, be entitled to be absolutely or conditionally discharged under section 73 above; and
  • (b) if the tribunal notifies him that the patient would be entitled to be conditionally discharged, may recommend that in the event of his not being discharged under this section he should continue to be detained in hospital.
  • (2) If in the case of a patient not falling within subsection (4) below—
  • (a) the tribunal notifies the Secretary of State that the patient would be entitled to be absolutely or conditionally discharged; and
  • (b) within the period of 90 days beginning with the date of that notification the Secretary of State gives notice to the tribunal that the patient may be so discharged,

the tribunal shall direct the absolute or, as the case may be, the conditional discharge of the patient.

  • (3) Where a patient continues to be liable to be detained in a hospital at the end of the period referred to in subsection (2)(b) above because the Secretary of State has not given the notice there mentioned, the managers of the hospital shall, unless the tribunal has made a recommendation under subsection (1)(b) above, transfer the patient to a prison or other institution in which he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, there to be dealt with as if he had not been so removed.
  • (4) If, in the case of a patient who is subject to a transfer direction under section 48 above, the tribunal notifies the Secretary of State that the patient would be entitled to be absolutely or conditionally discharged, the Secretary of State shall, unless the tribunal has made a recommendation under subsection (1)(b) above, by warrant direct that the patient be remitted to a prison or other institution in which he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, there to be dealt with as if he had not been so removed.
  • (5) Where a patient is transferred or remitted under subsection (3) or (4) above the relevant hospital direction and the limitation direction or, as the casemay be, the relevant transfer direction and the restriction direction shall cease to have effect on his arrival in the prison or other institution.
  • (5A) Where the tribunal has made a recommendation under subsection (1)(b) above in the case of a patient who is subject to a restriction direction or a limitation direction—
  • (a) the fact that the restriction direction or limitation direction remains in force does not prevent the making of any application or reference to the Parole Board by or in respect of him or the exercise by him of any power to require the Secretary of State to refer his case to the Parole Board, and
  • (b) if the Parole Board make a direction or recommendation by virtue of which the patient would become entitled to be released (whether unconditionally or on licence) from any prison or other institution in which he might have been detained if he had not been removed to hospital, the restriction direction or limitation direction shall cease to have effect at the time when he would become entitled to be so released.
  • (6) Subsections (3) to (8) of section 73 above shall have effect in relation to this section as they have effect in relation to that section, taking references to the relevant hospital order and the restriction order as references to the hospital direction and the limitation direction or, as the case may be, to the transfer direction and the restriction direction.
  • (7) This section is without prejudice to sections 50 to 53 above in their application to patients who are not discharged under this section.

Applications and references concerning conditionally discharged restricted patients

75
  • (1) Where a restricted patient has been conditionally discharged under section 42(2), 73 or 74 above (“conditionally discharged”) and is subsequently recalled to hospital—
  • (a) the Secretary of State shall, within one month of the day on which the patient returns or is returned to hospital, refer his case to the appropriate tribunal; and
  • (b) section 70 above shall apply to the patient as if the relevant hospital order , hospital direction or transfer direction had been made on that day.
  • (2) Where a restricted patient has been conditionally discharged , is not subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty and has not been recalled to hospital he may apply to the appropriate tribunal—
  • (a) in the period between the expiration of 12 months and the expiration of two years beginning—
  • (i) in the case of a patient who has previously been subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty, with the date on which the patient most recently ceased to be subject to such conditions, and
  • (ii) in any other case, with the date on which the patient was conditionally discharged; and
  • (b) in any subsequent period of two years.
  • (2A) Where a restricted patient has been conditionally discharged, is subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty and has not been recalled to hospital, the patient may apply to the appropriate tribunal—
  • (a) in the period between the expiration of six months and the expiration of 12 months beginning with the date on which the patient most recently became subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty (whether or not that was the date on which the patient was conditionally discharged), and
  • (b) in any subsequent period of two years.
  • (2C) Where a restricted patient has been conditionally discharged, is subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty and has not been recalled to hospital, the Secretary of State must refer the patient’s case to the appropriate tribunal on the expiry of—
  • (a) the period of 12 months beginning with the date on which the patient most recently became subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty (whether or not that was the date on which the patient was conditionally discharged), and
  • (b) each subsequent period of two years.
  • (2D) The Secretary of State is not required to make a reference under subsection (2C) if the patient’s case was considered by the appropriate tribunal during the period in question.
  • (2E) The Secretary of State must refer to the appropriate tribunal the case of any restricted patient who has been conditionally discharged, is subject to conditions amounting to a deprivation of liberty and has not been recalled to hospital if—
  • (a) the patient’s case has not been considered by the appropriate tribunal within the last four years, and
  • (b) there is no pending application or reference to the appropriate tribunal in relation to the patient’s case.
  • (2F) The Secretary of State may by order vary the length of a period mentioned in subsection (2C) or (2E).
  • (2G) An order under subsection (2F) may make—
  • (a) provision subject to specified exceptions;
  • (b) different provision for different cases or areas;
  • (c) transitional, consequential, incidental or supplemental provision.
  • (2H) Any reference under subsection (2C) or (2E) must be made to the tribunal for the area in which the patient resides.
  • (2I) References in this section to the patient’s case being considered by the appropriate tribunal are to the patient’s case being considered by the appropriate tribunal on the patient’s own application or otherwise.

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published on legislation.gov.uk. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original CLML XML to this format.

This text is published under legislation.gov.uk's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence. legislation.gov.uk
Open Government Licence v3.0 (attribution required)
© Crown and database right. Derived from content available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 from legislation.gov.uk.