The Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020

Made: 6th January 2020

Laid before Parliament: 10th January 2020

Coming into force: 1st February 2020

The Secretary of State makes the following Regulations, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 50(1), (2)(e) and (f), (2A), (3), (3A) to (3G), (4) and (7), 51(1), (2)(b), (2)(ba) and (c), (2A) to (2H), (3A) and (4), 84(1) to (6), 88A(2)(b) and 88G(1)(b) of the Police Act 1996 , section 36(1(a) and (b) of, and paragraph 29 of Schedule 3 to, the Police Reform Act 2002 and section 29(7) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 .

In accordance with section 63(3)(a) of the Police Act 1996 , the Secretary of State has supplied a draft of these Regulations to the Police Advisory Board for England and Wales and has taken into consideration the representations made by that Board before making these Regulations.

PART 1 — Preliminary

Citation and commencement

1

These Regulations may be cited as the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020 and come into force on 1st February 2020.

Interpretation and delegation

2

• (1) In these Regulations—

• “the 1996 Act” means the Police Act 1996;

• “the 2002 Act” means the Police Reform Act 2002;

• “the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations” means the Police (Complaints and Misconduct Regulations) 2020 ;

• “the Performance Regulations” means the Police (Performance) Regulations 2020 ;

• “the Police Regulations” means the Police Regulations 2003 ;

• “the Vetting Regulations” means the Police (Vetting) Regulations 2025;

• “accelerated misconduct hearing” means a hearing to which the officer concerned is referred under regulation 49 after the case has been certified as one where the special conditions are satisfied;

• “acting chief officer” means—a person exercising or performing functions of a chief constable in accordance with section 41 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 (power of deputy to exercise functions of chief constable);a person exercising powers or duties of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in accordance with section 44 (functions of Deputy Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis) or 45(4) (Assistant Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis) of that Act, ora person exercising duties of the Commissioner of Police for the City of London in accordance with section 25 of the City of London Police Act 1839 ;

• “allegation” means an allegation relating to a complaint, conduct matter or practice requiring improvement;

• “appeal meeting” means a meeting held in accordance with regulation 46;

• “appropriate authority” means, subject to regulation 26(3)—where the officer concerned is the chief officer or acting chief officer of any police force, the local policing body for the force's area;in any other case, the chief officer of police of the police force concerned;

• “complainant” has the meaning given to it by section 29(2) of the 2002 Act (interpretation of Part 2) ;

• “complaint” has the meaning given to it by section 12 of the 2002 Act (complaints, matters and persons to which Part 2 applies) ;

• “conduct” includes acts, omissions, statements and decisions (whether actual, alleged or inferred);

• “conduct matter” has the meaning given to it by section 12 of the 2002 Act (complaints, matters and persons to which Part 2 applies) ;

• “criminal proceedings” means—any prospective criminal proceedings, orall criminal proceedings brought which have not been brought to a conclusion (apart from the bringing and determination of any appeal other than an appeal against conviction to the Crown Court);

• “designated police volunteer” means a person designated as a community support volunteer or a policing support volunteer under section 38(1A) of the Police Reform Act 2002;

• “Director General” means the Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct, established under section 9 of the 2002 Act (the Independent Office for Police Conduct) ;

• “disciplinary action” means, in order of seriousness starting with the least serious action—a written warning;a final written warning;reduction in rank, ordismissal without notice;

• “disciplinary proceedings” means—misconduct proceedings under Part 4 of these Regulations;an accelerated misconduct hearing under Part 5 of these Regulations, oran appeal from misconduct proceedings or from an accelerated misconduct hearing under the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020 , but, for the purposes of the following provisions, “disciplinary proceedings” only includes misconduct proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a) and a hearing mentioned in paragraph (b) of this definition—paragraph (a) of the definition of “disciplinary proceedings” in section 87(5) of the 1996 Act (guidance concerning disciplinary proceedings etc.) ;paragraph (a) of the definition of “disciplinary proceedings” in section 29(1) of the 2002 Act (interpretation of Part 2) ;section 36(2) of the 2002 Act (conduct of disciplinary proceedings) ;

• “document” means anything in which information of any description is recorded;

• “gross misconduct” means a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is so serious as to justify dismissal , and for the purposes of these Regulations conduct which has resulted in conviction of an indictable-only offence is to be taken to constitute such a breach;

• “harm test” has the meaning given to it in regulation 6;

• “HMCIC” means Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Constabulary appointed under section 54(1) of the 1996 Act (appointment and functions of inspectors of constabulary);

• “human resources professional” means a police officer or police staff member who has specific responsibility for personnel matters relating to members of a police force;

• “informant” means a person who provides information to an investigation on the basis that the person's identity is not disclosed during the course of the disciplinary proceedings;

• ...

• “interested person” means a person who has an interest in being kept properly informed about the handling of a complaint or conduct matter in accordance with section 21 of the 2002 Act (duty to provide information for other persons) ;

• “investigator” means a person—appointed under regulation 15, orappointed or designated under paragraph 16, 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations) , as the case may be;

• “line manager” means the police officer or the police staff member who has immediate supervisory responsibility for the officer concerned;

• “misconduct”, other than in regulation 23(2)(a) and the first reference to “misconduct” in regulation 23(2)(b), means a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is so serious as to justify disciplinary action;

• “misconduct hearing” means a hearing to which the officer concerned has been referred under regulation 23 to determine whether the conduct of the officer amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct or neither and , if it amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, what disciplinary action should be imposed;

• “misconduct meeting” means a meeting to which the officer concerned has been referred under regulation 23 to determine whether the conduct of the officer amounts to misconduct or not and , if it amounts to misconduct, what disciplinary action should be imposed;

• “misconduct proceedings” means a misconduct meeting or misconduct hearing;

• “officer concerned” means the police officer in relation to whose conduct there has been an allegation;

• “originating authority” has the meaning given to it in regulation 26(3);

• “personal record” means a personal record kept under regulation 15 of the Police Regulations (contents of personal records) ;

• “police barred list” means the list referred to in section 88B(2) of the 1996 Act (duty to maintain police barred list) ;

• “police force concerned” means—the police force of which the officer concerned is a member, orwhere the officer concerned is a special constable, the police force maintained for the police area for which the officer is appointed;

• “police friend” means a person chosen by the officer concerned in accordance with regulation 7;

• “police officer” means a member of a police force or special constable;

• “police staff member” means—a member of the civilian staff of a police force, within the meaning of section 102(4) and (6) of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 (interpretation of Part 1), oran employee of the Common Council of the City of London who is under the direction and control of a chief officer;

• “practice requiring improvement” has the meaning given in paragraph (7);

• “pre-commencement allegation” means an allegation against a police officer which came to the attention of a local policing body or a chief officer of police before 1st February 2020;

• “proposed witness” means a witness whose attendance at the misconduct proceedings the officer concerned or the appropriate authority, as the case may be, wishes to request of the person conducting or chairing those proceedings;

• “reflective practice review process” means the process set out in Part 6;

• “relevant lawyer” has the meaning given to it by section 84(4) of the 1996 Act (representation etc. at disciplinary and other proceedings) ;

• “senior officer” means a member of a police force holding a rank above that of chief superintendent;

• “severity assessment” has the meaning given to it in regulation 14;

• “special conditions” has the meaning given to it in regulation 49;

• “staff association” means—in relation to a member of a police force of the rank of chief inspector or below or a special constable, the Police Federation of England and Wales;in relation to a member of a police force of the rank of superintendent or chief superintendent, the Police Superintendents' Association, andin relation to a member of a police force who is a senior officer, the Chief Police Officers' Staff Association;

• “Standards of Professional Behaviour” has the meaning given in regulation 5 and references in these Regulations to the Standards of Professional Behaviour are to be construed accordingly ;

• “working day” means any day other than—a Saturday or Sunday;Christmas Day or Good Friday, ora day which is a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 in England and Wales.

• (2) In these Regulations—

• (a) a reference to an officer other than a senior officer includes a reference to a special constable, regardless of the officer's level of seniority;

• (b) a reference to a copy of a statement, where it was not made in writing, is to be construed as a reference to a copy of an account of that statement.

• (2A) For the purposes of these Regulations, an offence is an “indictable-only” offence if—

• (a) in the case of an offence under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland, it is an offence which, if committed by an adult, is triable only on indictment;

• (b) in the case of an offence under the law of Scotland, it is an offence triable only on indictment.

• (3) Where the appropriate authority is a chief officer of police, the chief officer may, subject to paragraphs (4) and (4A), delegate any functions under these Regulations to a—

• (a) member of a police force of at least the rank of inspector, or

• (b) police staff member who, in the opinion of the chief officer, is of at least a similar level of seniority to an inspector.

• (4) Where the appropriate authority delegates its functions under regulation 11 or 49, the following decisions must be authorised by a senior officer—

• (a) a decision under regulation 11 to suspend an officer or to continue or end such a suspension;

• (b) a decision under regulation 49 as to whether to certify a case as one where the special conditions are satisfied.

• (4A) Where a chief officer of police is required to—

• (a) chair misconduct proceedings under regulation 28(4)(a); or

• (b) conduct an accelerated misconduct hearing under regulation 55,

the chief officer of police may delegate the responsibility for chairing or conducting the disciplinary proceedings in accordance with paragraphs (4B) and (4C).

• (4B) Where the chief officer of police delegates under paragraph (4A) the responsibility for chairing or conducting disciplinary proceedings, the person to whom that responsibility is delegated must be—

• (a) a senior officer;

• (b) a former senior officer, who last served as a senior officer no more than five years before the date on which the responsibility for chairing or conducting the disciplinary proceedings is to be delegated to them; or

• (c) unless the case to which the disciplinary proceedings relate substantially involves operational policing matters, a police staff member who, in the opinion of the chief officer of police, is of at least a similar level of seniority to a senior officer.

• (4C) But where the chief officer of police delegates, under paragraph (3), their functions under regulation 49, the person to whom the responsibility has been delegated under paragraph (4A) must not be the same senior officer who—

• (a) certified the case under regulation 49 as being one where the special conditions are satisfied; or

• (b) authorised the decision to certify under paragraph (4)(b).

• (4D) For the purposes of paragraph (4B)—

• (a) “senior officer” includes a member of a police force who is required to perform the duties normally performed by a member of a police force holding a rank above that of chief superintendent;

• (b) “former senior officer” includes a person who, at the time they ceased to be a member of a police force, was required to perform the duties normally performed by a member of a police force holding a rank above that of chief superintendent.

• (5) For the purposes of these Regulations, the making of a protected disclosure by a police officer is not a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

• (6) In paragraph (5), “protected disclosure” has the meaning given by section 43A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (meaning of protected disclosure) .

• (7) In these Regulations, “practice requiring improvement” means underperformance or conduct not amounting to misconduct or gross misconduct, which falls short of the expectations of the public and the police service.

• (8) When a person assesses whether an officer’s performance or conduct amounts to “practice requiring improvement”, they must have regard to the Code of Ethics, published by the College of Policing, as amended from time to time.

Revocations and transitional provisions

3

• (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the following are revoked—

• (a) the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 (“the 2012 Regulations”);

• (b) the Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 ;

• (c) the Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 ;

• (d) the following provisions of the Police (Conduct, Complaints and Misconduct and Appeal Tribunal) (Amendment) Regulations 2017 —

• (i) regulation 1 in so far as it applies to the 2012 Regulations;

• (ii) regulation 2(1) and (3) (transitional provision);

• (iii) Part 2 (amendment of the 2012 Regulations);

• (iv) Schedule 1 (modifications to the 2012 Regulations).

• (2) Subject to regulation 4(7), the Regulations and provisions mentioned in paragraph (1) and regulations 2(1) and 10(1)(a) of the Police Barred List and Police Advisory List Regulations 2017 as in force immediately before these Regulations come into force continue to have effect in relation to—

• (a) a pre-commencement allegation;

• (b) an allegation against a police officer which comes to the attention of a local policing body or a chief officer of police on or after 1st February 2020 and which relates to a matter in respect of which a pre-commencement allegation against that person was made, if at the time the allegation is made the pre-commencement allegation is being handled in accordance with—

• (i) any of the Regulations and provisions in paragraph (1), or

• (ii) Part 2 of the 2002 Act.

Application

4

• (1) Subject to paragraph (6), these Regulations apply where an allegation comes to the attention of an appropriate authority which indicates that the conduct of a police officer may amount to misconduct, gross misconduct or practice requiring improvement.

• (2) Subject to paragraph (6) and except as set out in paragraph (8), these Regulations also apply, with the modifications set out in Schedule 1, where—

• (a) an allegation comes to the attention of a relevant body which indicates that the conduct of a person who at the time of the alleged conduct was a police officer (“P”) may amount to gross misconduct , and

• (b) condition A, B or C is satisfied.

• (3) Condition A is that P ceased to be a police officer after the allegation first came to the attention of a relevant body.

• (4) Condition B is that—

• (a) P ceased to be a police officer before the allegation first came to the attention of a relevant body, and

• (b) the period between the date P ceased to be a police officer and the date the allegation first came to the attention of the relevant body did not exceed 12 months.

• (5) Condition C is that—

• (a) P ceased to be a police officer before the allegation first came to the attention of a relevant body;

• (b) the period between the date P ceased be a police officer and the date the allegation first came to the attention of the relevant body exceeded 12 months, and