The Prison and Young Offender Institution (Interception of Communications) (Amendment) Rules 2024

Type Statutory-Instrument
Publication 2024-11-21
State In force
Department King's Printer of Acts of Parliament
PDF Download
articles Not indexed
Reform history JSON API

Made: 21st November 2024

Laid before Parliament: 27th November 2024

Coming into force: 6th January 2025

The Secretary of State makes these Rules in exercise of the powers conferred by section 47 of the Prison Act 1952[^f00001].

Citation, commencement and extent

1

Amendment of the Prison Rules 1999

2

(2B) The condition in this paragraph is that— (a) the governor has reasonable cause to believe that the communication is being made with the intention of furthering a criminal purpose; and (b) the arrangements for interception of the communication are authorised by— (i) the chief executive officer of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service; (ii) the director responsible for national operational services of that service; or (iii) the duty director of that service. (2C) The condition in this paragraph is that— (a) the communication is by means of a telecommunications system which facilitates the transmission of both images (whether moving or otherwise) and sound; (b) the interception is only of the images and not of sound; and (c) the governor considers that the arrangements are— (i) necessary on grounds specified in paragraph (4); and (ii) proportionate to what is sought to be achieved.

Amendment of the Young Offender Institution Rules 2000

3

(2B) The condition in this paragraph is that— (a) the governor has reasonable cause to believe that the communication is being made with the intention of furthering a criminal purpose; and (b) the arrangements for interception of the communication are authorised by— (i) the chief executive officer of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service; (ii) the director responsible for national operational services of that service; or (iii) the duty director of that service. (2C) The condition in this paragraph is that— (a) the communication is by means of a telecommunications system which facilitates the transmission of both images (whether moving or otherwise) and sound; (b) the interception is only of the images and not of sound; and (c) the governor considers that the arrangements are— (i) necessary on grounds specified in paragraph (4); and (ii) proportionate to what is sought to be achieved.

Signed

Timpson — Minister of State — Ministry of Justice — 21st November 2024

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Rules)

Explanatory Note

These Rules make amendments to the Prison Rules 1999 (S.I. 1999/728) (“the Prison Rules”) and the Young Offender Institution Rules 2000 (S.I. 2000/3371) (“the YOI Rules”).

Prior to the amendments made in these Rules, governors could only make arrangements for interception of any communication between a prisoner and either their legal advisor or a body or organisation on the “Confidential Access” list, when a single set of conditions were fulfilled. These were that the governor had reasonable cause to believe that the communication was being made with the intention of furthering a criminal purpose, and that they were authorised by a listed official in the National Offender Management Service.

These amendments will additionally allow governors to make such arrangements when a second set of conditions are fulfilled. These new conditions are that the communication is by means of a “video calling” system which enables the use of both video and audio, that the interception is only of the video, and that the governor considers the arrangement to be necessary on one of the grounds already specified in paragraph (4), and proportionate to what is sought to be achieved.

“Out of hearing but in sight” is the level of supervision permitted in respect of in-person visits by legal advisers under rule 38 of the Prison Rules. These amendments will enable governors to make arrangements for this same level of supervision in respect of video calls between prisoners and their legal advisor or a body or organisation on the “Confidential Access” list, by making arrangements to intercept the video of the call, but not the audio. Previously, the only way for governors to make arrangements for this same level of supervision in respect of such video calls was to request consent to the interception from the prisoner and the person they were calling, and if one of them refused, to arrange for staff to patrol the rooms where video calls took place, and physically look through the windows in order to check the video on the prisoner’s screen, which was resource-intensive.

An impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no significant impact on the private, voluntary or public sectors is foreseen.

Footnotes

[^f00001]: 1952 c. 52. Section 47(1) was amended by section 6(2) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (c. 33) and paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 9 to the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (c. 2).

[^f00002]: S.I. 1999/728, amended by S.I. 2000/2641, 2009/3082 and 2011/1663; there are other amending instruments but none is relevant.

[^f00003]: S.I. 2000/3371, amended by S.I. 2009/3082 and 2011/1663; there are other amending instruments but none is relevant.

Reading this document does not replace reading the official text published on legislation.gov.uk. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from the conversion of the original CLML XML to this format.

This text is published under legislation.gov.uk's own terms of reuse, not a Legalize or public-domain licence. legislation.gov.uk
Open Government Licence v3.0 (attribution required)
© Crown and database right. Derived from content available under the Open Government Licence v3.0 from legislation.gov.uk.