Reform history
Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 Text with EEA relevance
6 versions
· 2014-07-23
2026-01-17
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central se
2025-01-17
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central se
2024-05-01
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central se
2024-01-16
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central se
Changes on 2024-01-16
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
(25) ‘branch’ means a place of business other than the head office which is a part of a CSD, which has no legal personality and which provides CSD services for which the CSD has been authorised;
(26) ‘default’, in relation to a participant, means a situation where insolvency proceedings, as defined in point (j) of Article 2 of Directive 98/26/EC, are opened against a participant;
(26) ‘default’ means, in relation to a participant, a situation where insolvency proceedings, as defined in Article 2, point (j), of Directive 98/26/EC, are opened against a participant or an event defined in the CSD’s internal rules as constituting a default;
(27) ‘delivery versus payment’ or ‘DVP’ means a securities settlement mechanism which links a transfer of securities with a transfer of cash in a way that the delivery of securities occurs if and only if the corresponding transfer of cash occurs and vice versa;
@@ -107,7 +107,15 @@
(45) ‘management body’ means the body or bodies of a CSD, appointed in accordance with national law, which is empowered to set the CSD’s strategy, objectives and overall direction, and which oversees and monitors management decision-making and includes persons who effectively direct the business of the CSD.
Where, according to national law, a management body comprises different bodies with specific functions, the requirements of this Regulation shall apply only to members of the management body to whom the applicable national law assigns the respective responsibility;
(46) ‘senior management’ means those natural persons who exercise executive functions within a CSD and who are responsible and accountable to the management body for the day-to-day management of that CSD.
(46) ‘senior management’ means those natural persons who exercise executive functions within a CSD and who are responsible and accountable to the management body for the day-to-day management of that CSD;
(47) ‘group’ means a group within the meaning of Article 2, point (11), of Directive 2013/34/EU;
(48) ‘close links’ means close links as defined in Article 4(1), point (35), of Directive 2014/65/EU;
(49) ‘qualifying holding’ means a direct or indirect holding in a CSD which represents at least 10 % of the capital or of the voting rights, as set out in Articles 9, 10 and 11 of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (<sup>1</sup>), or which makes it possible to exercise a significant influence over the management of the CSD;
(50) ‘deferred net settlement’ means a settlement mechanism whereby cash or securities transfer orders in relation to securities transactions of the participants in the securities settlement system are subject to netting, and whereby settlement of participants’ net claims and obligations takes place at the end of predefined settlement cycles during or at the end of the business day.
## TITLE II
@@ -149,165 +157,745 @@
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, issue guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 on the standardised procedures and messaging protocols to be used for complying with the second subparagraph of this paragraph.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the measures to prevent settlement fails in order to increase settlement efficiency and in particular:
(a) the measures to be taken by investment firms in accordance with paragraph 2, first subparagraph;
(b) the details of the procedures that facilitate settlement referred to in paragraph 3, which could include the shaping of transaction sizes, partial settlement of failing trades and the use of auto-lend/borrow programmes provided by certain CSDs; and
(c) the details of the measures to encourage and incentivise the timely settlement of transactions referred to in paragraph 4.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 July 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 7
##### Measures to address settlement fails
Before establishing the procedures referred to in the first subparagraph, a CSD shall consult the relevant trading venues and CCPs in respect of which it provides settlement services.
The penalty mechanism referred to in the first subparagraph shall include cash penalties for participants that cause settlement fails (’failing participants‘). Cash penalties shall be calculated on a daily basis for each business day that a transaction fails to be settled after its intended settlement date until the transaction is either settled or bilaterally cancelled. The cash penalties shall not be configured as a revenue source for the CSD.
The penalty mechanism referred to in paragraph 2 shall not apply to:
(c) transactions where the failing participant is a CCP, except for transactions entered into by a CCP where it does not interpose itself between the counterparties; or
(d) transactions where insolvency proceedings are opened against the failing participant.
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 67 to supplement this Regulation by specifying parameters for the calculation of a deterrent and proportionate level of the cash penalties referred to in paragraph 2, third subparagraph, of this Article based on all of the following:
(a) asset type;
(b) liquidity of the financial instrument;
(c) type of transaction;
(d) duration of the settlement fail.
When specifying the parameters referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account the level of settlement fails per class of financial instruments and the effect that low or negative interest rates could have on the incentives of counterparties and on settlement fails. The parameters used for the calculation of cash penalties shall ensure a high degree of settlement discipline and the smooth and orderly functioning of the financial markets concerned.
The Commission shall review the parameters for the calculation of the level of the cash penalties on a regular basis and at least every four years in order to reassess the appropriateness and effectiveness of the cash penalties in achieving a level of settlement fails in the Union deemed to be acceptable having regard to the impact on the financial stability of the Union.
Public disclosure of suspensions shall not contain personal data as defined in Article 4, point (1), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (<sup>3</sup>).
This paragraph shall not apply to failing participants which are CCPs or in cases where insolvency proceedings are opened against the failing participant.
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 67 to supplement this Regulation by specifying:
(a) the underlying causes of settlement fails that are considered as not attributable to the participants in the transaction under paragraph 3, point (a), of this Article; and
(b) the circumstances in which operations are not considered as trading under paragraph 3, point (b), of this Article.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:
(a) the details of the system monitoring settlement fails and the reports on settlement fails referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the processes for collection and redistribution of cash penalties and any other possible proceeds from such penalties in accordance with paragraph 2;
(c) the conditions under which a participant is deemed to fail, consistently and systematically, to deliver the financial instruments as referred to in paragraph 7.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 7a
##### Mandatory buy-in process
The Commission may adopt the implementing act referred to in the first subparagraph only if both of the following conditions are met:
(a) the application of the penalty mechanism referred to in Article 7(2) has not resulted in a long-term sustainable reduction of settlement fails in the Union or in maintaining a reduced level of settlement fails in the Union, even after a review of the level of cash penalties in accordance with Article 7(5), second subparagraph;
(b) the level of settlement fails in the Union has or is likely to have a negative effect on the financial stability of the Union.
For the purposes of reaching the decision referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission shall take into account all of the following:
(a) the potential impact of the mandatory buy-in process on financial markets in the Union;
(b) the number, volume and duration of settlement fails, including the number and volume of settlement fails outstanding at the end of the extension period referred to in paragraph 4;
(c) whether a particular financial instrument or category of transactions in that financial instrument is already subject to appropriate contractual provisions that provide a right for receiving participants to trigger a buy-in.
The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 68(2). It shall specify a date of application that is not earlier than one year after its entry into force.
Before adopting the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall:
(a) assess the effectiveness and proportionality of the penalty mechanism referred to in Article 7(2) and, where appropriate, change the structure or severity of the penalty mechanism in order to increase settlement efficiency in the Union;
(b) consider whether the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 are met, despite the prior application of the penalty mechanism referred to in Article 7(2) and the rationale for, and potential cost implications of, subjecting specific financial instruments and categories of transactions to mandatory buy-ins.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, based on the asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments concerned, the extension period may be increased to a maximum of seven business days where a shorter extension period would affect the smooth and orderly functioning of the markets concerned.
By way of derogation from the first and second subparagraphs, where the transaction relates to a financial instrument traded on an SME growth market, the extension period shall be 15 business days unless the SME growth market decides to apply a shorter period.
The intermediate receiving participant shall be considered as complying with the obligation to execute a mandatory buy-in against the failing participant where it passes on its obligation in accordance with the first subparagraph. The intermediate receiving participant may also pass on to the failing participant its obligations towards the end receiving participant pursuant to paragraphs 8, 9 and 10.
The relevant CSD shall be informed about how the failed transaction was resolved throughout the chain of transactions.
The mandatory buy-in process referred to in paragraph 4 shall not apply to:
(a) the settlement fails, operations and transactions listed in Article 7(3);
(b) securities financing transactions;
(c) other types of transactions that render the buy-in process unnecessary;
(d) transactions that fall within the scope of Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012.
Cash compensation shall be paid no later than on the second business day after the end of either the mandatory buy-in process referred to in paragraph 4 or, in cases where the receiving participant chooses to defer the execution of the buy-in, the deferral period.
Paragraphs 4 to 10 shall apply to all transactions of the financial instruments referred to in Article 5(1) which are admitted to trading or traded on a trading venue or cleared by a CCP as follows:
(a) for transactions cleared by a CCP, the CCP shall be the entity that executes the buy-in according to paragraphs 4 to 10;
(b) for transactions not cleared by a CCP, but executed on a trading venue, the trading venue shall include in its internal rules an obligation for its members and its participants to apply the measures referred to in paragraphs 4 to 10;
(c) for all transactions other than those referred to in points (a) and (b) of this subparagraph, CSDs shall include in their internal rules an obligation for their participants to be subject to the measures referred to in paragraphs 4 to 10.
A CSD shall provide the necessary settlement information to CCPs and trading venues to enable them to fulfil their obligations under this paragraph.
Without prejudice to points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph, CSDs may monitor the execution of buy-ins as referred to in those points with respect to multiple settlement instructions, on the same financial instruments and with the same date of expiry of the execution period, with the aim of minimising the number of buy-ins to be executed and thus the impact on the prices of the relevant financial instruments.
Before making the recommendation referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall consult the members of the ESCB and the European Systemic Risk Board.
The Commission shall, without undue delay after receipt of the recommendation, on the basis of the reasons and evidence provided by ESMA, either suspend the mandatory buy-in mechanism referred to in paragraphs 4 to 10 for the specific categories of financial instruments by means of an implementing act, or reject the recommended suspension. Where the Commission rejects the recommended suspension, it shall provide the reasons therefor in writing to ESMA. Such information shall not be made public.
The implementing act referred to in the third subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 68(3).
The suspension of the mandatory buy-in mechanism shall be communicated to ESMA and shall be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* and on the Commission’s website.
The suspension of the mandatory buy-in mechanism shall be valid for an initial period of no more than six months from the date of application of that suspension.
Where the grounds for the suspension continue to apply, the Commission may, by way of an implementing act, extend the suspension for additional periods of no more than three months each, with the total period of the suspension not exceeding 12 months. Any extensions of the suspension shall be published in accordance with the fifth subparagraph.
The implementing act referred to in the seventh subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 68(3). ESMA shall, in sufficient time before the end of the suspension referred to in the sixth subparagraph or of the extension referred to in the seventh subparagraph, issue an opinion to the Commission on whether the grounds for the suspension continue to apply.
Where the Commission considers that mandatory buy-ins are no longer justified or do not address settlement fails in the Union and are no longer necessary, appropriate or proportionate, it shall, without delay, adopt implementing acts amending or repealing the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1.
The implementing act referred to in the second subparagraph shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 68(2).
Where ESMA considers that mandatory buy-ins are no longer justified or do not address settlement fails in the Union and are no longer necessary, appropriate or proportionate, it may recommend that the Commission amend or repeal the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1. Paragraph 13, first to fourth subparagraphs, shall apply *mutatis mutandis*.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to further specify:
(a) the details of the operation of the appropriate buy-in process referred to in paragraphs 4 to 10, including appropriate timeframes, calibrated taking into account the asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments, for the delivery of the financial instrument following the buy-in process;
(b) the circumstances under which the extension period could be prolonged according to asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments, in accordance with the conditions referred to in paragraph 4, second subparagraph, taking into account the criteria for assessing liquidity under Article 2(1), point (17), of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014;
(c) the details of the pass-on mechanism under paragraph 6;
(d) other types of transactions that render the buy-in process unnecessary as referred to in paragraph 7, point (c), such as financial collateral arrangements or transactions that include close-out netting provisions;
(e) a methodology for the calculation of the cash compensation referred to in paragraph 9;
(f) the necessary settlement information referred to in paragraph 11, second subparagraph; and
(g) the details of how the participants of the CSDs, the CCPs and the trading venue members are to take into account the specificities of retail investors when executing the mandatory buy-in in accordance with paragraph 11.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 8
##### Enforcement
## *CHAPTER IV*
### ***Internalised settlement***
#### Article 9
##### Settlement internalisers
Competent authorities shall without delay transmit the information received under the first subparagraph to ESMA and shall inform ESMA of any potential risk resulting from that settlement activity.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## TITLE III
### **CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORIES**
## *CHAPTER I*
### ***Authorisation and supervision of CSDs***
## Section 1
### **Authorities responsible for authorisation and supervision of CSDs**
#### Article 10
##### Competent authority
Without prejudice to the oversight by the members of the ESCB referred to in Article 12(1), a CSD shall be authorised and supervised by the competent authority of its home Member State.
#### Article 11
##### Designation of the competent authority
Where a Member State designates more than one competent authority, it shall determine their respective roles and shall designate a single authority to be responsible for cooperation with other Member States’ competent authorities, the relevant authorities, ESMA, and EBA, where specifically referred to in this Regulation.
#### Article 12
##### Relevant authorities
The following authorities shall be involved in the authorisation and supervision of CSDs where specifically referred to in this Regulation:
(a) the authority responsible for the oversight of the securities settlement system operated by the CSD in the Member State whose law applies to that securities settlement system;
(b) the central banks in the Union issuing the most relevant currencies in which settlement takes or will take place;
(c) where relevant, the central bank in the Union in whose books the cash payments of a securities settlement system operated by the CSD is or will be settled.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 7
##### Measures to address settlement fails
Before establishing the procedures referred to in the first subparagraph, a CSD shall consult the relevant trading venues and CCPs in respect of which it provides settlement services.
The penalty mechanism referred to in the first subparagraph shall include cash penalties for participants that cause settlement fails (‘failing participants’). Cash penalties shall be calculated on a daily basis for each business day that a transaction fails to be settled after its intended settlement date until the end of a buy-in process referred to in paragraph 3, but no longer than the actual settlement day. The cash penalties shall not be configured as a revenue source for the CSD.
Where the transaction relates to a financial instrument traded on an SME growth market the extension period shall be 15 days unless the SME growth market decides to apply a shorter period.
The following exemptions from the requirement referred to in paragraph 3 shall apply:
(a) based on asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments concerned, the extension period may be increased from four business days up to a maximum of seven business days where a shorter extension period would affect the smooth and orderly functioning of the financial markets concerned;
(b) for operations composed of several transactions including securities repurchase or lending agreements, the buy-in process referred to in paragraph 3 shall not apply where the timeframe of those operations is sufficiently short and renders the buy-in process ineffective.
Cash compensation shall be paid to the receiving participant no later than on the second business day after the end of either the buy-in process referred to in paragraph 3 or the deferral period, where the deferral period was chosen.
Public disclosure of suspensions shall not contain personal data within the meaning of point (a) of Article 2 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Paragraphs 2 to 9 shall apply to all transactions of the financial instruments referred to in Article 5(1) which are admitted to trading or traded on a trading venue or cleared by a CCP as follows:
(a) for transactions cleared by a CCP, the CCP shall be the entity that executes the buy-in according to paragraphs 3 to 8;
(b) for transactions not cleared by a CCP but executed on a trading venue, the trading venue shall include in its internal rules an obligation for its members and its participants to apply the measures referred to in paragraphs 3 to 8;
(c) for all transactions other than those referred to in points (a) and (b) of this subparagraph, CSDs shall include in their internal rules an obligation for their participants to be subject to the measures referred to in paragraphs 3 to 8.
A CSD shall provide the necessary settlement information to CCPs and trading venues to enable them to fulfil their obligations under this paragraph.
Without prejudice to points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph, CSDs may monitor the execution of buy-ins referred to in those points with respect to multiple settlement instructions, on the same financial instruments and with the same date of expiry of the execution period, with the aim of minimising the number of buy-ins to be executed and thus the impact on the prices of the relevant financial instruments.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:
(a) the details of the system monitoring settlement fails and the reports on settlement fails referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the processes for collection and redistribution of cash penalties and any other possible proceeds from such penalties in accordance with paragraph 2;
(c) the details of operation of the appropriate buy-in process referred to in paragraphs 3 to 8, including appropriate time-frames to deliver the financial instrument following the buy-in process referred to in paragraph 3. Such time-frames shall be calibrated taking into account the asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments;
(d) the circumstances under which the extension period could be prolonged according to asset type and liquidity of the financial instruments, in accordance with the conditions referred to in point (a) of paragraph 4 taking into account the criteria for assessing liquidity under point (17) of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014;
(e) type of operations and their specific time-frames referred to in point (b) of paragraph 4 that renders buy-in ineffective;
(f) a methodology for the calculation of the cash compensation referred to in paragraph 7;
(g) the conditions under which a participant is deemed consistently and systematically to fail to deliver the financial instruments as referred to in paragraph 9; and
(h) the necessary settlement information referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 10.
#### Article 13
##### Exchange of information
#### Article 14
##### Cooperation between authorities
In order to ensure consistent, efficient and effective supervisory practices within the Union, including cooperation between competent authorities and relevant authorities in the different assessments necessary for the application of this Regulation, ESMA may, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, issue guidelines addressed to competent authorities in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 15
##### Emergency situations
Without prejudice to the notification procedure provided for in Article 6(3) of Directive 98/26/EC, competent authorities and relevant authorities shall immediately inform ESMA, the European Systemic Risk Board established by Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (<sup>4</sup>) and each other of any emergency situation relating to a CSD, including of any developments in financial markets, which may have an adverse effect on market liquidity, the stability of a currency in which settlement takes place, the integrity of monetary policy or on the stability of the financial system in any of the Member States where the CSD or one of its participants are established.
## Section 2
### **Conditions and procedures for authorisation of CSDs**
#### Article 16
##### Authorisation of a CSD
#### Article 17
##### Procedure for granting authorisation
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, where an applicant CSD does not comply with all requirements of this Regulation, but where it can reasonably be assumed that it will do so when it commences its activities, the competent authority may grant the authorisation subject to the condition that the applicant CSD has all the necessary arrangements in place to comply with the requirements of this Regulation when it commences its activities.
Each relevant authority may issue a reasoned opinion within its areas of competence to the competent authority within three months of receipt of the information by the relevant authority. Where a relevant authority does not provide an opinion within that timeframe it shall be deemed to have issued a positive opinion.
Where at least one of the relevant authorities issues a negative reasoned opinion, and the competent authority nevertheless intends to grant the authorisation, that competent authority shall, within one month of receipt of the negative opinion, provide the relevant authorities with the reasons why it intends to grant the authorisation notwithstanding the negative opinion.
Any of the relevant authorities that issued a negative opinion referred to in the third subparagraph may refer the matter to ESMA for assistance under Article 31(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the issue is not settled within one month of the referral to ESMA, the competent authority intending to grant the authorisation shall take a final decision and provide the relevant authorities with a detailed explanation of its decision in writing.
Where the competent authority intends to refuse authorisation, the matter shall not be referred to ESMA.
A negative opinion referred to in the third subparagraph shall state in writing the full and detailed reasons why the requirements laid down in this Regulation or other requirements of Union law are not met.
The competent authority shall, before granting authorisation to the applicant CSD, consult the competent authorities of the other Member State involved in the following cases:
(a) the CSD is a subsidiary of a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(b) the CSD is a subsidiary of the parent undertaking of a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(c) the CSD is controlled by the same natural or legal persons who control a different CSD authorised in another Member State.
The consultation referred to in paragraph 6 shall cover the following:
(a) the suitability of the shareholders and persons referred to in Article 27(6) and the reputation and experience of the persons who effectively direct the business of the CSD referred to in Article 27(1) and (4), where those shareholders and persons are common to the CSD and to a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(b) whether the relations referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 6 between the CSD authorised in another Member State and the applicant CSD do not affect the ability of the latter to comply with the requirements of this Regulation.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 8
##### Enforcement
## *CHAPTER IV*
### ***Internalised settlement***
#### Article 9
##### Settlement internalisers
Competent authorities shall without delay transmit the information received under the first subparagraph to ESMA and shall inform ESMA of any potential risk resulting from that settlement activity.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 18
##### Effects of the authorisation
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 19
##### Extension and outsourcing of activities and services
An authorised CSD shall submit an application for authorisation to the competent authority of its home Member State where it wishes to outsource a core service to a third party under Article 30 or extend its activities to one or more of the following:
(a) additional core services listed in Section A of the Annex, not covered by the initial authorisation;
(b) ancillary services permitted under, but not explicitly listed in Section B of the Annex, not covered by the initial authorisation;
(c) the operation of another securities settlement system;
(d) the settlement of all or part of the cash leg of its securities settlement system in the books of another settlement agent;
(e) setting up an interoperable link, including those with third-country CSDs.
The granting of an authorisation under paragraph 1, point (b), shall follow the procedure laid down in Article 17(1), (2), (3), (5) and (8a).
The granting of an authorisation under paragraph 1, point (e), shall follow the procedure laid down in Article 17(1), (2) and (3).
The competent authority shall inform the applicant CSD whether the authorisation has been granted or refused within three months of submission of a complete application.
#### Article 20
##### Withdrawal of authorisation
Without prejudice to any remedial actions or measures under Title V, the competent authority of the home Member State shall withdraw the authorisation in any of the following circumstances, where the CSD:
(a) has not made use of the authorisation during 12 months, expressly renounces the authorisation or has provided no services or performed no activity during the preceding six months;
(b) has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or by any other unlawful means;
(c) no longer complies with the conditions under which authorisation was granted and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the competent authority within a set time-frame;
(d) has seriously or systematically infringed the requirements laid down in this Regulation or, where applicable, in Directive 2014/65/EU or Regulation (EU) No 600/2014.
#### Article 21
##### CSD register
## Section 3
### **Supervision of CSDs**
#### Article 22
##### Review and evaluation
The competent authority shall establish the frequency and depth of the review and evaluation referred to in the first subparagraph having regard to the size, systemic importance, risk profile, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the CSD concerned.
The review and evaluation shall take place at least every three years.
The consulted authorities may issue a reasoned opinion within their areas of competence within three months of receipt of the information from the competent authority.
Where a consulted authority does not provide an opinion within that deadline it shall be deemed to have issued a positive opinion.
Where a consulted authority issues a negative reasoned opinion and the competent authority disagrees with it, that competent authority shall, within one month of receipt of the negative opinion, provide the consulted authority with a reasoning addressing the negative opinion.
Any of the consulted authorities that issued a negative opinion may refer the matter to ESMA for assistance under Article 31(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the issue is not settled within one month of its referral to ESMA, the competent authority shall take the final decision on the review and evaluation and provide a detailed explanation of its decision in writing to the relevant authorities.
Negative opinions referred to in the fourth subparagraph shall state in writing the full and detailed reasons why the requirements laid down in this Regulation or other requirements of Union law are not met.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the following:
(a) the information that the CSD is to provide to the competent authority for the purposes of the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the information that the competent authority is to supply in accordance with paragraph 7;
(c) the information that the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 8 are to supply one another.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 22a
##### Plans for recovery and orderly wind-down
The plans referred to in paragraph 1 shall have regard to the size, systemic importance, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the CSD concerned and contain at least the following:
(a) a substantive summary of the key recovery or orderly wind-down strategies;
(b) an identification of the CSD’s critical operations and services;
(c) adequate procedures ensuring the raising of additional capital in cases where the CSD’s equity capital approaches or falls below the requirements laid down in Article 47(1);
(d) adequate procedures ensuring the orderly wind-down or restructuring of the CSD’s operations and services where the CSD is unable to raise new capital;
(e) adequate procedures ensuring the timely and orderly settlement and transfer of the assets of clients and participants to another CSD in the event it becomes permanently impossible for the CSD to restore its critical operations and services;
(f) a description of the measures needed to implement the key strategies.
Where a resolution plan under Directive 2014/59/EU, or a similar plan under national law with the aim of ensuring the continuity of a CSD’s core services, is established and maintained for a CSD, the resolution authority or, where no such authority exists, the competent authority shall inform ESMA of the existence of such a plan.
Where the recovery plan and the resolution plan under Directive 2014/59/EU, or any similar plan under national law, contain all of the elements listed in paragraph 2, the CSD shall not be required to prepare the plans pursuant to paragraph 1.
## Section 4
### **Provision of services in another member state**
#### Article 23
##### Freedom to provide services in another Member State
Any CSD that intends to provide the services referred to in paragraph 2 in relation to financial instruments constituted under the law of another Member State referred to in Article 49(1), second subparagraph, point (a), for the first time, or to change the range of those services provided, shall communicate the following information to the competent authority of the home Member State:
(a) the host Member State;
(b) a programme of operations stating in particular the services which the CSD intends to provide, including the type of financial instruments constituted under the law of the host Member State in respect of which the CSD intends to provide such services;
(c) the currency or currencies that the CSD intends to process;
(d) an assessment of the measures the CSD intends to take to allow its users to comply with the law of the host Member State referred to in Article 49(1), second subparagraph, point (a), in relation to shares.
A CSD intending to set up a branch in another Member State for the first time or to change the range of the core service referred to in Section A, point 1, of the Annex, or of the core service referred to in Section A, point 2, of the Annex, provided through a branch, shall communicate the following information to the competent authority of the home Member State:
(a) the information referred to in paragraph 3, points (a), (b) and (c);
(b) the organisational structure of the branch and the names of the persons responsible for the management of the branch;
(c) an assessment of the measures that the CSD intends to take to allow its users to comply with the law of the host Member State referred to in Article 49(1), second subparagraph, point (a), in relation to shares.
The competent authority of the host Member State shall without delay inform the relevant authorities of that Member State of any communication received under the first subparagraph.
The competent authority of the home Member State shall immediately inform the CSD of the date of transmission of the communication referred to in the first subparagraph.
#### Article 24
##### Cooperation between authorities of the home Member State and of the host Member State and peer review
The competent authority of the home Member State may invite staff from the competent authorities of the host Member States and from ESMA to participate in on-site inspections.
The competent authority of the home Member State shall transmit to ESMA and to the college referred to in Article 24a the findings of the on-site inspections and information on any remedial actions or penalties decided on by that competent authority.
Where, despite measures taken by the competent authority of the home Member State, the CSD persists in acting in breach of the obligations arising from the provisions of this Regulation, the competent authority of the host Member State shall, after informing the competent authority of the home Member State, take all the appropriate measures needed in order to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Regulation within the territory of the host Member State. The competent authority of the host Member State shall inform ESMA and the college referred to in Article 24a of such measures without undue delay.
The competent authority of the host Member State or the competent authority of the home Member State may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
In the context of the peer review referred to in the first subparagraph ESMA shall, where appropriate, also request opinions or advice from the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group referred to in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## TITLE III
### **CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORIES**
## *CHAPTER I*
### ***Authorisation and supervision of CSDs***
#### Article 24a
##### College of supervisors
The college shall be established within one month of the date when:
(a) the competent authority of the home Member State determines that the activities carried out by the CSD in at least two host Member States are of substantial importance; or
(b) the competent authority of the home Member State is notified by one of the entities listed in paragraph 4 that the activities carried out by the CSD in at least two host Member States are of substantial importance.
The college shall consist of:
(a) ESMA;
(b) the competent authority of the home Member State;
(c) the relevant authorities referred to in Article 12;
(d) the competent authorities of the host Member States in which the CSD’s activities are of substantial importance;
(e) EBA, where the CSD has been authorised pursuant to Article 54(3).
The college shall, without prejudice to the responsibilities of competent authorities under this Regulation, ensure:
(a) the exchange of information, including requests for information pursuant to Articles 13, 14 and 15 and information on the review and evaluation process pursuant to Article 22;
(b) efficient supervision by avoiding unnecessary duplicative supervisory actions, such as information requests;
(c) agreement on the voluntary entrustment of tasks among its members;
(d) the exchange of information on an authorised outsourcing or extension of activities and services under Article 19;
(e) the cooperation between the authorities of the home Member State and of the host Member State pursuant to Article 24 regarding the measures referred to in Article 23(3), point (d), and any issues encountered in relation to the provision of services in other Member States;
(f) the exchange of information on group structure, senior management, management body and shareholders pursuant to Article 27;
(g) the exchange of information on processes or arrangements that have a significant impact on governance or risk management for the CSDs belonging to the group.
In order to facilitate the performance of the tasks assigned to the college pursuant to paragraph 8, members of the college may add points to the agenda of a meeting.
The chair may invite additional participants to the discussions of the college on an ad hoc basis on specific topics.
The members of a college other than its chair may decide not to participate in a meeting of the college.
Upon the request of any of its members, the college shall adopt, in accordance with paragraph 11, non-binding opinions with regard to:
(a) issues identified during the review and evaluation processes pursuant to Article 22 or 60;
(b) issues relating to any outsourcing or extension of activities and services under Article 19; or
(c) issues relating to any potential breach of this Regulation arising from the provision of services in a host Member State as referred to in Article 24(5).
That agreement shall determine the practical arrangements for the functioning of the college, including the modalities of communication amongst members of the college, and may determine tasks to be entrusted to them.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 5
### **Relations with third countries**
#### Article 25
##### Third countries
After consulting the authorities referred to in paragraph 5, ESMA may recognise a third-country CSD that has applied for recognition to provide the services referred to in paragraph 2, where the following conditions are met:
(a) the Commission has adopted a decision in accordance with paragraph 9;
(b) the third-country CSD is subject to effective authorisation, supervision and oversight or, if the securities settlement system is operated by a central bank, oversight, ensuring full compliance with the prudential requirements applicable in that third country;
(c) cooperation arrangements between ESMA and the responsible authorities in that third country (‘responsible third-country authorities’) have been established pursuant to paragraph 10;
(d) where relevant, the third-country CSD takes the necessary measures to allow its users to comply with the relevant national law of the Member State in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services, including the law referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), and the adequacy of those measures has been confirmed by the competent authorities of the Member State in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services;
(e) the third-country CSD is established or authorised in a third country that is not identified as a high-risk third country in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 9(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council (<sup>5</sup>).
When assessing whether the conditions referred to in paragraph 4 are met, ESMA shall consult:
(a) the competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services, in particular, on how the third-country CSD intends to comply with the requirement referred to in point (d) of paragraph 4;
(b) the relevant authorities;
(c) the responsible third-country authorities entrusted with the authorisation, supervision and oversight of CSDs.
The applicant CSD shall provide ESMA with all information deemed to be necessary for its recognition. Within 30 working days from the receipt of the application, ESMA shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, ESMA shall set a time limit by which the applicant CSD has to provide additional information.
The competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services shall assess the compliance of the third-country CSD with the law referred to in point (d) of paragraph 4 and inform ESMA with a fully reasoned decision whether the compliance is met or not within three months from the receipt of all the necessary information from ESMA.
The recognition decision shall be based on the criteria laid down in paragraph 4.
Within six months of submission of a complete application or of adoption of an equivalence decision by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 9, whichever is later, ESMA shall inform the applicant CSD in writing with a fully reasoned decision whether the recognition has been granted or refused.
The competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD, duly recognised under paragraph 4, provides CSD services, in close cooperation with ESMA, may request the responsible third-country authorities to:
(a) report periodically on the third-country CSD’s activities in those host Member States, including for the purpose of collecting statistics;
(b) communicate, within an appropriate time-frame, the identity of the issuers and participants in the securities settlement systems operated by the third-country CSD which provides services in that host Member State and any other relevant information concerning the activities of that third-country CSD in the host Member State.
ESMA shall withdraw the recognition of that CSD where the conditions laid down in paragraph 4 are no longer met, or in the circumstances referred to in Article 20.
In making the determination referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may also consider whether the legal and supervisory arrangements of a third country reflect the internationally agreed CPSS-IOSCO standards, in so far as the latter do not conflict with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
In accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall establish cooperation arrangements with the responsible third-country authorities whose legal and supervisory frameworks have been recognised as equivalent to this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 9. Such arrangements shall specify at least:
(a) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA, the competent authorities of the host Member State and the third-country responsible authorities, including access to all information regarding the CSDs authorised in third countries that is requested by ESMA and in particular access to information in the cases referred to in paragraph 7;
(b) the mechanism for prompt notification of ESMA where a third-country responsible authority deems a CSD that it is supervising to infringe the conditions of its authorisation or of other applicable law;
(c) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities including, where appropriate, on-site inspections.
Where a cooperation agreement provides for transfers of personal data by a Member State, such transfers shall comply with the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC and where a cooperation agreement provides for transfers of personal data by ESMA, such transfers shall comply with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 45/2001.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the information that the third-country CSD is to provide to ESMA in the notification referred to in paragraph 2a. Such information shall be limited to what is strictly necessary, including, where applicable and available:
(a) the number of participants located in the Union to whom the third-country CSD provides or intends to provide the services referred to in paragraph 2a;
(b) the number and volume of transactions in financial instruments constituted under the law of a Member State settled during the previous year;
(c) the number and volume of transactions settled by Union participants during the previous year.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## *CHAPTER II*
### ***Requirements for CSDs***
## Section 1
### **Authorities responsible for authorisation and supervision of CSDs**
#### Article 10
##### Competent authority
Without prejudice to the oversight by the members of the ESCB referred to in Article 12(1), a CSD shall be authorised and supervised by the competent authority of its home Member State.
#### Article 11
##### Designation of the competent authority
Where a Member State designates more than one competent authority, it shall determine their respective roles and shall designate a single authority to be responsible for cooperation with other Member States’ competent authorities, the relevant authorities, ESMA, and EBA, where specifically referred to in this Regulation.
#### Article 12
##### Relevant authorities
The following authorities shall be involved in the authorisation and supervision of CSDs where specifically referred to in this Regulation:
(a) the authority responsible for the oversight of the securities settlement system operated by the CSD in the Member State whose law applies to that securities settlement system;
(b) the central banks in the Union issuing the most relevant currencies in which settlement takes place;
(c) where relevant, the central bank in the Union in whose books the cash leg of a securities settlement system operated by the CSD is settled.
### **Organisational requirements**
#### Article 26
##### General provisions
Where a CSD intends to provide banking-type ancillary services to other CSDs pursuant to Article 54(2a), first subparagraph, point (b), that CSD shall have in place clear rules and procedures addressing potential conflicts of interest and mitigating the risk of discriminatory treatment towards those other CSDs and their participants.
A CSD shall maintain and operate effective written organisational and administrative arrangements to identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest between its participants or their clients and the CSD itself, including:
(a) the CSD’s managers;
(b) the CSD’s employees;
(c) the members of the CSD’s management body;
(d) any person with direct or indirect control over the CSD;
(e) any person with close links with any of the persons listed in points (a), (b) and (c); and
(f) any person with close links with the CSD itself.
A CSD shall maintain and implement adequate resolution procedures where possible conflicts of interest occur.
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying at the CSD level and at the group level as referred to in paragraph 7:
(a) the monitoring tools for the risks of the CSDs referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the responsibilities of the key personnel in respect of the risks of the CSDs referred to in paragraph 1;
(c) the potential conflicts of interest referred to in paragraph 3;
(d) the audit methods referred to in paragraph 6; and
(e) the circumstances in which it would be appropriate, taking into account potential conflicts of interest between the members of the user committee and the CSD, to share audit findings with the user committee in accordance with paragraph 6.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 13
##### Exchange of information
#### Article 14
##### Cooperation between authorities
In order to ensure consistent, efficient and effective supervisory practices within the Union, including cooperation between competent authorities and relevant authorities in the different assessments necessary for the application of this Regulation, ESMA may, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, issue guidelines addressed to competent authorities in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 15
##### Emergency situations
Without prejudice to the notification procedure provided for in Article 6(3) of Directive 98/26/EC, competent authorities and relevant authorities shall immediately inform ESMA, the European Systemic Risk Board established by Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (<sup>2</sup>) and each other of any emergency situation relating to a CSD, including of any developments in financial markets, which may have an adverse effect on market liquidity, the stability of a currency in which settlement takes place, the integrity of monetary policy or on the stability of the financial system in any of the Member States where the CSD or one of its participants are established.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
#### Article 27
##### Senior management, management body and shareholders
For the purposes of this Article, an independent member of the management body means a member of the management body who has no business, family or other relationship that raises a conflict of interest regarding the CSD concerned or its controlling shareholders, its management or its participants, and who has had no such relationship during the five years preceding their membership of the management body.
A CSD shall, without delay:
(a) provide the competent authority with information regarding the ownership of the CSD, and, in particular, the identity and scale of interests of any person having a qualifying holding in the CSD;
(b) make public:
(i) the information provided to the competent authority under point (a); and
(ii) the transfer of ownership rights that results in a change in control of the CSD.
#### Article 27a
##### Information to competent authorities
Where the conduct of a member of the management body is likely to be prejudicial to the sound and prudent management of the CSD, the competent authority shall take appropriate measures, which may include removing that member from the management body.
Any natural or legal person who has taken a decision to dispose, directly or indirectly, of a qualifying holding in a CSD (the ‘proposed vendor’) shall first notify the competent authority in writing thereof, indicating the size of such holding. Such a person shall likewise notify the competent authority where it has taken a decision to reduce a qualifying holding so that the proportion of the voting rights or of the capital held would fall below 10 %, 20 %, 30 % or 50 % or so that the CSD would cease to be that person’s subsidiary.
The competent authority shall have a maximum of 60 working days after the date of the written acknowledgement of receipt of the notification and all documents required to be attached to the notification on the basis of the list referred to in Article 27b(4) (the ‘assessment period’), to carry out the assessment provided for in Article 27b(1) (the ‘assessment’).
The competent authority shall inform the proposed acquirer or proposed vendor of the date of the expiry of the assessment period at the time of acknowledging the receipt.
The assessment period shall be suspended for the period between the date of the request for information by the competent authority and the receipt of a response thereto by the proposed acquirer. The suspension shall not exceed 20 working days. Any further requests by the competent authority for completion or clarification of the information shall be at its discretion but shall not result in a suspension of the assessment period.
#### Article 27b
##### Assessment
When assessing the notification provided for in Article 27a(2) and the information referred to in Article 27a(4), the competent authority shall, in order to ensure the sound and prudent management of the CSD in which an acquisition is proposed and having regard to the likely influence of the proposed acquirer on the CSD, assess the suitability of the proposed acquirer and the financial soundness of the proposed acquisition against all of the following:
(a) the reputation and financial soundness of the proposed acquirer;
(b) the reputation, knowledge, skills and experience of any person who will direct the business of the CSD as a result of the proposed acquisition;
(c) whether the CSD will be able to comply and continue to comply with this Regulation;
(d) whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that, in connection with the proposed acquisition, money laundering or terrorist financing within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 is being or has been committed or attempted, or that the proposed acquisition could increase the risk thereof.
When assessing the financial soundness of the proposed acquirer, the competent authority shall pay particular attention to the type of business pursued and envisaged in the CSD in which the acquisition is proposed.
When assessing the CSD’s ability to comply with this Regulation, the competent authority shall pay particular attention to whether the group of which it will become a part has a structure that makes it possible to exercise effective supervision, to effectively exchange information among the competent authorities and to determine the allocation of responsibilities among the competent authorities.
#### Article 27c
##### Derogation for CSDs providing banking-type ancillary services
Articles 27a and 27b shall not apply to a CSD which has been authorised pursuant to Article 54(3) and is subject to Directive 2013/36/EU.
#### Article 28
##### User committee
#### Article 29
##### Record keeping
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 30
##### Outsourcing
Where a CSD outsources services or activities to a third party, it shall remain fully responsible for discharging all of its obligations under this Regulation and shall comply at all times with the following conditions:
(a) outsourcing does not result in the delegation of its responsibility;
(b) the relationship and obligations of the CSD towards its participants or issuers are not altered;
(c) the conditions for the authorisation of the CSD do not effectively change;
(d) outsourcing does not prevent the exercise of supervisory and oversight functions, including on-site access to acquire any relevant information needed to fulfil those functions;
(e) outsourcing does not result in depriving the CSD of the systems and controls necessary to manage the risks it faces;
(f) the CSD retains the expertise and resources necessary for evaluating the quality of the services provided, the organisational and capital adequacy of the service provider, for supervising the outsourced services effectively and for managing the risks associated with the outsourcing on an ongoing basis;
(g) the CSD has direct access to the relevant information of the outsourced services;
(h) the service provider cooperates with the competent authority and the relevant authorities in connection with the outsourced activities;
(i) the CSD ensures that the service provider meets the standards set down by the relevant data protection law which would apply if the service providers were established in the Union. The CSD is responsible for ensuring that those standards are set out in a contract between the parties and that those standards are maintained.
#### Article 31
##### Services provided by parties other than CSDs
ESMA shall include such information in the CSD register referred to in Article 21.
## Section 2
### **Conditions and procedures for authorisation of CSDs**
#### Article 16
##### Authorisation of a CSD
#### Article 17
##### Procedure for granting authorisation
The competent authority shall, before granting authorisation to the applicant CSD, consult the competent authorities of the other Member State involved in the following cases:
(a) the CSD is a subsidiary of a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(b) the CSD is a subsidiary of the parent undertaking of a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(c) the CSD is controlled by the same natural or legal persons who control a different CSD authorised in another Member State.
The consultation referred to in paragraph 6 shall cover the following:
(a) the suitability of the shareholders and persons referred to in Article 27(6) and the reputation and experience of the persons who effectively direct the business of the CSD referred to in Article 27(1) and (4), where those shareholders and persons are common to the CSD and to a CSD authorised in another Member State;
(b) whether the relations referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 6 between the CSD authorised in another Member State and the applicant CSD do not affect the ability of the latter to comply with the requirements of this Regulation.
### **Conduct of business rules**
#### Article 32
##### General provisions
#### Article 33
##### Requirements for participation
In the event of a refusal, the requesting participant has the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access.
That competent authority shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting participant with a reasoned reply.
That competent authority shall consult the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting participant on its assessment of the complaint. Where the authority of the requesting participant disagrees with the assessment provided, any one of the two competent authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to grant access to the requesting participant is deemed to be unjustified, the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access shall issue an order requiring that CSD to grant access to the requesting participant.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
@@ -317,699 +905,439 @@
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 18
##### Effects of the authorisation
#### Article 34
##### Transparency
#### Article 35
##### Communication procedures with participants and other market infrastructures
CSDs shall use in their communication procedures with participants of the securities settlement systems they operate, and with the market infrastructures they interface with international open communication procedures and standards for messaging and reference data in order to facilitate efficient recording, payment and settlement.
## Section 3
### **Requirements for CSD services**
#### Article 36
##### General provisions
For each securities settlement system it operates a CSD shall have appropriate rules and procedures, including robust accounting practices and controls, to help ensure the integrity of securities issues, and minimise and manage the risks associated with the safekeeping and settlement of transactions in securities.
#### Article 37
##### Integrity of the issue
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 19
##### Extension and outsourcing of activities and services
An authorised CSD shall submit an application for authorisation to the competent authority of its home Member State where it wishes to outsource a core service to a third party under Article 30 or extend its activities to one or more of the following:
(a) additional core services listed in Section A of the Annex, not covered by the initial authorisation;
(b) ancillary services permitted under, but not explicitly listed in Section B of the Annex, not covered by the initial authorisation;
(c) the operation of another securities settlement system;
(d) the settlement of all or part of the cash leg of its securities settlement system in the books of another settlement agent;
(e) setting up an interoperable link, including those with third-country CSDs.
The competent authority shall inform the applicant CSD whether the authorisation has been granted or refused within three months of the submission of a complete application.
#### Article 20
#### Article 38
##### Protection of securities of participants and those of their clients
However, a CSD and its participants shall provide individual clients segregation for citizens and residents of, and legal persons established in, a Member State where required under the national law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted as it stands at 17 September 2014. That obligation shall apply as long as the national law is not amended or repealed and its objectives are still valid.
#### Article 39
##### Settlement finality
#### Article 40
##### Cash settlement
#### Article 41
##### Participant default rules and procedures
## Section 4
### **Prudential requirements**
#### Article 42
##### General requirements
A CSD shall adopt a sound risk-management framework for comprehensively managing legal, business, operational and other direct or indirect risks, including measures to mitigate fraud and negligence.
#### Article 43
##### Legal risks
#### Article 44
##### General business risk
A CSD shall have robust management and control systems as well as IT tools in order to identify, monitor and manage general business risks, including losses from poor execution of business strategy, cash flows and operating expenses.
#### Article 45
##### Operational risks
It shall also inform the competent authority and relevant authorities without delay of any operational incidents resulting from such risks.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 46
##### Investment policy
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 47
##### Capital requirements
Capital, together with retained earnings and reserves of a CSD, shall be proportional to the risks stemming from the activities of the CSD. It shall be at all times sufficient to:
(a) ensure that the CSD is adequately protected against operational, legal, custody, investment and business risks so that the CSD can continue to provide services as a going concern;
(b) ensure an orderly winding-down or restructuring of the CSD’s activities over an appropriate time span of at least six months under a range of stress scenarios.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
#### Article 47a
##### Deferred net settlement
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 5
### **Requirements for CSD links**
#### Article 48
##### CSD links
A link shall be supported by an appropriate contractual arrangement that sets out the respective rights and obligations of the linked CSDs and, where necessary, of the CSDs’ participants. A contractual arrangement with cross-jurisdictional implications shall provide for an unambiguous choice of law that govern each aspect of the link’s operations.
Interoperable securities settlement systems and CSDs, which use a common settlement infrastructure shall establish identical moments of:
(a) entry of transfer orders into the system;
(b) irrevocability of transfer orders.
The securities settlement systems and CSDs referred to in the first subparagraph shall use equivalent rules concerning the moment of finality of transfers of securities and cash.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Powers is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## *CHAPTER III*
### ***Access to CSDs***
## Section 1
### **Access of issuers to CSDs**
#### Article 49
##### Freedom to issue in a CSD authorised in the Union
Without prejudice to the issuer’s right referred to in the first subparagraph, the corporate or similar law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted shall continue to apply. The corporate or similar law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted means:
(a) the corporate or similar law of the Member State where the issuer is incorporated; and
(b) the governing corporate or similar law of the Member State under which the securities are issued.
Member States shall compile a list of key relevant provisions of their corporate or similar law, as referred to in the second subparagraph. Competent authorities shall communicate that list to ESMA by 17 January 2025. ESMA shall publish that list by 17 February 2025. Member States shall regularly, and at least every two years, update that list. They shall communicate the updated list at those regular intervals to ESMA. ESMA shall publish such updated list.
The CSD may charge a reasonable commercial fee for the provision of its services to issuers on a cost-plus basis, unless otherwise agreed by both parties.
In the case of a refusal, the requesting issuer shall have the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that refuses to provide its services.
The competent authority of that CSD shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal provided by the CSD and shall provide the issuer with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the CSD shall consult the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting issuer on its assessment of the complaint. Where the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting issuer disagrees with that assessment, any one of the two competent authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to provide its services to an issuer is deemed to be unjustified, the responsible competent authority shall issue an order requiring the CSD to provide its services to the requesting issuer.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 2
### **Access between CSDs**
#### Article 50
##### Standard link access
A CSD shall have the right to become a participant of another CSD and set up a standard link with that CSD in accordance with Article 33 and subject to the prior notification of the CSD link provided under Article 19(5).
#### Article 51
##### Customised link access
#### Article 52
##### Procedure for CSD links
Where a CSD refuses access, it shall provide the requesting CSD with full reasons for its refusal.
In the case of a refusal, the requesting CSD has the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access.
The competent authority of the receiving CSD shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting CSD with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the receiving CSD shall consult the competent authority of the requesting CSD and the relevant authority of the requesting CSD referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) on its assessment of the complaint. Where any of the authorities of the requesting CSD disagrees with the assessment provided, any one of the authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to grant access to the requesting CSD is deemed to be unjustified, the competent authority of the receiving CSD shall issue an order requiring that CSD to grant access to the requesting CSD.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 3
### **Access between a CSD and another market infrastructure**
#### Article 53
##### Access between a CSD and another market infrastructure
A CSD shall provide access to its securities settlement systems on a non-discriminatory and transparent basis to a CCP or a trading venue and may charge a reasonable commercial fee for such access on a cost-plus basis, unless otherwise agreed by both parties.
A party that refuses access shall provide the requesting party with full written reasons for such refusal based on a comprehensive risk assessment. In the case of a refusal, the requesting party has the right to complain to the competent authority of the party that has refused access.
The competent authority of the receiving party and the relevant authority referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting party with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the receiving party shall consult the competent authority of the requesting party and the relevant authority referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) on its assessment of the complaint. Where any of the authorities of the requesting party disagrees with the assessment provided, any of them may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by a party to grant access is deemed to be unjustified, the responsible competent authority shall issue an order requiring that party to grant access to its services within three months.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## TITLE IV
### **PROVISION OF BANKING-TYPE ANCILLARY SERVICES FOR CSD PARTICIPANTS**
#### Article 54
##### Authorisation and designation to provide banking-type ancillary services
A CSD that intends to settle the cash payments for all or part of its securities settlement systems through accounts opened with a credit institution or with a CSD in accordance with Article 40(2) shall be authorised, under the conditions specified in paragraphs 3 to 9a of this Article, to designate for that purpose one or more:
(a) credit institutions authorised in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU; or
(b) CSDs authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article.
An authorisation to designate credit institutions or CSDs in accordance with the first subparagraph shall only be used with regard to the banking-type ancillary services referred to in Section C of the Annex for the settlement of the cash payments for all or part of the securities settlement systems of the CSD seeking to use the banking-type ancillary services, and not to carry out any other activities.
The credit institutions and CSDs authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services designated in accordance with the first subparagraph shall be considered to be settlement agents.
Where a CSD seeks to provide any banking-type ancillary services from within the same legal entity as the legal entity operating the securities settlement system the authorisation referred to in paragraph 2 shall be granted only where the following conditions are met:
(a) the CSD is authorised as a credit institution as provided for in Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU;
(b) the CSD meets the prudential requirements laid down in Article 59(1), (3) and (4) and the supervisory requirements laid down in Article 60;
(c) the authorisation referred to in point (a) of this subparagraph is used only to provide the banking-type ancillary services referred to in Section C of the Annex and not to carry out any other activities;
(d) the CSD is subject to an additional capital surcharge that reflects the risks, including credit and liquidity risks, resulting from the provision of intra-day credit, inter alia, to the participants in a securities settlement system or other users of CSD services;
(e) the CSD reports at least monthly to the competent authority and annually as a part of its public disclosure as required under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on the extent and management of intra-day liquidity risk in accordance with point (j) of Article 59(4) of this Regulation;
(f) the CSD has submitted to the competent authority an adequate recovery plan to ensure continuity of its critical operations, including in situations where liquidity or credit risk crystallises as a result of the provision of banking-type ancillary services.
In the case of conflicting provisions laid down in this Regulation, in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and in Directive 2013/36/EU, the CSD referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph shall comply with the stricter requirements on prudential supervision. The regulatory technical standards referred to in Articles 47 and 59 of this Regulation shall clarify the cases of conflicting provisions.
Where all of the following conditions are met, a CSD may be authorised to designate a credit institution to provide banking-type ancillary services for the settlement of the cash payments for all or part of that CSD’s securities settlement systems pursuant to paragraph 2a, point (a):
(a) the credit institution meets the prudential requirements laid down in Article 59(1), (3) and (4) and the supervisory requirements laid down in Article 60;
(b) the credit institution does not itself carry out any of the core services referred to in Section A of the Annex;
(c) the authorisation under Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU is used only to provide the banking-type ancillary services referred to in Section C of the Annex for the settlement of the cash payments for all or part of the securities settlement systems of the CSD seeking to use the banking-type ancillary services, and not to carry out any other activities;
(d) the credit institution is subject to an additional capital surcharge that reflects the risks, including credit and liquidity risks, resulting from the provision of intra-day credit, inter alia, to the participants in a securities settlement system or other users of CSD services;
(e) the credit institution reports at least monthly to the competent authority and discloses to the public annually as a part of its public disclosure as required under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on the extent and management of intra-day liquidity risk in accordance with Article 59(4), point (j), of this Regulation; and
(f) the credit institution has submitted to the competent authority an adequate recovery plan to ensure continuity of its critical operations, including in situations where liquidity or credit risk materialises as a result of the provision of banking-type ancillary services from within a separate legal entity.
The competent authority shall monitor at least once per year that the threshold defined in the first subparagraph is respected and report its findings to ESMA. Where the competent authority determines that the threshold has been exceeded, it shall require the CSD concerned to seek authorisation in accordance with paragraph 4. The CSD concerned shall submit its application for authorisation within six months.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
EBA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB and ESMA, develop draft regulatory technical standards to determine the threshold referred to in paragraph 5 and accompanying appropriate risk management and prudential requirements to mitigate risks in relation to the designation of credit institutions in accordance with paragraph 2a. When developing those standards, EBA shall take into account the following:
(a) the implications for the market stability that could derive from a change of risk profile of CSDs and their participants, including the systemic importance of CSDs for the functioning of securities markets;
(b) the implications for the credit and liquidity risks for CSDs, for the designated credit institutions involved and for the CSD participants that result from the settlement of cash payments through accounts opened with credit institutions that are not subject to paragraph 4;
(c) the possibility for CSDs to settle cash payments in several currencies;
(d) the need to avoid both an unintended shift from settlement in central bank money to settlement in commercial bank money and disincentives to the efforts of CSDs to settle in central bank money; and
(e) the need to ensure a level playing field amongst CSDs in the Union.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
#### Article 55
##### Procedure for granting and refusing authorisation to provide banking-type ancillary services
From the moment when the application is considered to be complete, the competent authority shall transmit all information included in the application to the following authorities:
(a) the relevant authorities;
(b) the competent authority referred to in point (40) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
(c) the competent authorities in the Member States where the CSD has established interoperable links with another CSD except where the CSD has established interoperable links referred to in Article 19(5);
(d) the competent authorities in the host Member State where the activities of the CSD are of substantial importance for the functioning of the securities markets and the protection of investors within the meaning of Article 24(4);
(e) the competent authorities responsible for the supervision of the participants of the CSD that are established in the three Member States with the largest settlement values in the CSD’s securities settlement system on an aggregate basis over a one-year period;
(f) ESMA; and
(g) EBA.
Where an authority referred to in paragraph 4, points (a) to (e), issues a negative reasoned opinion, the competent authority intending to grant the authorisation shall, within one month of receipt of that negative opinion, provide the authorities referred to in paragraph 4, points (a) to (e), with the reasons addressing the negative opinion.
Where, within one month of those reasons being presented, any of the authorities referred to in paragraph 4, points (a) to (e), issues a negative opinion and the competent authority nevertheless intends to grant the authorisation, any of the authorities that issued a negative opinion may refer the matter to ESMA for assistance under Article 31(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where 30 days after referral to ESMA the issue is not settled, the competent authority wishing to grant the authorisation shall take the final decision and provide a detailed explanation of its decision in writing to the authorities referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 4.
Where the competent authority wishes to refuse authorisation, the matter shall not be referred to ESMA.
Negative opinions shall state in writing the full and detailed reasons why the requirements laid down in this Regulation or other parts of Union law are not met.
The competent authority shall, without undue delay, inform the authorities referred to in paragraph 4, points (a) to (e), of the results of the authorisation process, including any remedial actions.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 56
##### Extension of the banking-type ancillary services
#### Article 57
##### Withdrawal of authorisation
Without prejudice to any remedial actions or measures under Title V, the competent authority of the home Member State shall withdraw the authorisation in any of the following circumstances, where the CSD:
(a) has not made use of the authorisation during 12 months, expressly renounces the authorisation or has provided no services or performed no activity during the preceding six months;
(b) has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or by any other unlawful means;
(c) no longer complies with the conditions under which authorisation was granted and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the competent authority within a set time-frame;
(d) has seriously or systematically infringed the requirements laid down in this Regulation or, where applicable, in Directive 2014/65/EU or Regulation (EU) No 600/2014.
#### Article 21
Without prejudice to any remedial actions or measures under Title V, the competent authority of the CSD’s home Member State shall withdraw the authorisations referred to in Article 54 in any of the following circumstances:
(a) where the CSD has not made use of the authorisation within 12 months, expressly renounces the authorisation or where the designated credit institution has provided no services or performed no activity for the preceding six months;
(b) where the CSD has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or by any other unlawful means;
(c) where the CSD or the designated credit institution is no longer in compliance with the conditions under which authorisation was granted and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the competent authority within a set time-frame;
(d) where the CSD or the designated credit institution has seriously and systematically infringed the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
#### Article 58
##### CSD register
## Section 3
### **Supervision of CSDs**
#### Article 22
##### Review and evaluation
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the following:
(a) the information that the CSD is to provide to the competent authority for the purposes of the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the information that the competent authority is to supply to the relevant authorities, as set out in paragraph 7;
(c) the information that the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 8 are to supply one another.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 4
### **Provision of services in another member state**
#### Article 23
##### Freedom to provide services in another Member State
Any CSD wishing to provide the services referred to in paragraph 2 within the territory of another Member State for the first time, or to change the range of those services provided shall communicate the following information to the competent authority of the home Member State:
(a) the Member State in which the CSD intends to operate;
(b) a programme of operations stating in particular the services which the CSD intends to provide;
(c) the currency or currencies that the CSD intends to process;
(d) where there is a branch, the organisational structure of the branch and the names of those responsible for the management of the branch;
(e) where relevant, an assessment of the measures the CSD intends to take to allow its users to comply with the national law referred to in Article 49(1).
The competent authority of the host Member State shall without delay inform the relevant authorities of that Member State of any communication received under the first subparagraph.
The CSD may start providing the services referred to in paragraph 2 in the host Member State under the following conditions:
(a) on receipt of a communication from the competent authority in the host Member State acknowledging receipt by the latter of the communication referred to in paragraph 4 and, where relevant, approving the assessment referred to in point (e) of paragraph 3;
(b) in the absence of any receipt of a communication, after three months from the date of transmission of the communication referred to in paragraph 4.
#### Article 24
##### Cooperation between authorities of the home Member State and of the host Member State and peer review
Where a CSD has become of substantial importance for the functioning of the securities markets and the protection of the investors in more than one host Member State, the home Member State may decide that such cooperation arrangements are to include colleges of supervisors.
Where, despite measures taken by the competent authority of the home Member State or because such measures prove inadequate, the CSD persists in acting in infringement of the obligations arising from the provisions of this Regulation, after informing the competent authority of the home Member State, the competent authority of the host Member State shall take all the appropriate measures needed in order to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Regulation within the territory of the host Member State. ESMA shall be informed of such measures without delay.
The competent authority of the host Member State and of the home Member State may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
In the context of the peer review referred to in the first subparagraph ESMA shall, where appropriate, also request opinions or advice from the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group referred to in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 5
### **Relations with third countries**
#### Article 25
##### Third countries
After consulting the authorities referred to in paragraph 5, ESMA may recognise a third-country CSD that has applied for recognition to provide the services referred to in paragraph 2, where the following conditions are met:
(a) the Commission has adopted a decision in accordance with paragraph 9;
(b) the third-country CSD is subject to effective authorisation, supervision and oversight or, if the securities settlement system is operated by a central bank, oversight, ensuring full compliance with the prudential requirements applicable in that third country;
(c) cooperation arrangements between ESMA and the responsible authorities in that third country (‘responsible third-country authorities’) have been established pursuant to paragraph 10;
(d) where relevant, the third-country CSD takes the necessary measures to allow its users to comply with the relevant national law of the Member State in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services, including the law referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), and the adequacy of those measures has been confirmed by the competent authorities of the Member State in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services.
When assessing whether the conditions referred to in paragraph 4 are met, ESMA shall consult:
(a) the competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services, in particular, on how the third-country CSD intends to comply with the requirement referred to in point (d) of paragraph 4;
(b) the relevant authorities;
(c) the responsible third-country authorities entrusted with the authorisation, supervision and oversight of CSDs.
The applicant CSD shall provide ESMA with all information deemed to be necessary for its recognition. Within 30 working days from the receipt of the application, ESMA shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, ESMA shall set a time limit by which the applicant CSD has to provide additional information.
The competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD intends to provide CSD services shall assess the compliance of the third-country CSD with the law referred to in point (d) of paragraph 4 and inform ESMA with a fully reasoned decision whether the compliance is met or not within three months from the receipt of all the necessary information from ESMA.
The recognition decision shall be based on the criteria laid down in paragraph 4.
Within six months from the submission of a complete application, ESMA shall inform the applicant CSD in writing with a fully reasoned decision whether the recognition has been granted or refused.
The competent authorities of the Member States in which the third-country CSD, duly recognised under paragraph 4, provides CSD services, in close cooperation with ESMA, may request the responsible third-country authorities to:
(a) report periodically on the third-country CSD’s activities in those host Member States, including for the purpose of collecting statistics;
(b) communicate, within an appropriate time-frame, the identity of the issuers and participants in the securities settlement systems operated by the third-country CSD which provides services in that host Member State and any other relevant information concerning the activities of that third-country CSD in the host Member State.
ESMA shall withdraw the recognition of that CSD where the conditions laid down in paragraph 4 are no longer met, or in the circumstances referred to in Article 20.
In making the determination referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may also consider whether the legal and supervisory arrangements of a third country reflect the internationally agreed CPSS-IOSCO standards, in so far as the latter do not conflict with the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
In accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA shall establish cooperation arrangements with the responsible third-country authorities whose legal and supervisory frameworks have been recognised as equivalent to this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 9. Such arrangements shall specify at least:
(a) the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA, the competent authorities of the host Member State and the third-country responsible authorities, including access to all information regarding the CSDs authorised in third countries that is requested by ESMA and in particular access to information in the cases referred to in paragraph 7;
(b) the mechanism for prompt notification of ESMA where a third-country responsible authority deems a CSD that it is supervising to infringe the conditions of its authorisation or of other applicable law;
(c) the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities including, where appropriate, on-site inspections.
Where a cooperation agreement provides for transfers of personal data by a Member State, such transfers shall comply with the provisions of Directive 95/46/EC and where a cooperation agreement provides for transfers of personal data by ESMA, such transfers shall comply with the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 45/2001.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## *CHAPTER II*
### ***Requirements for CSDs***
## Section 1
### **Organisational requirements**
#### Article 26
##### General provisions
ESMA shall, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying at the CSD level and at the group level as referred to in paragraph 7:
(a) the monitoring tools for the risks of the CSDs referred to in paragraph 1;
(b) the responsibilities of the key personnel in respect of the risks of the CSDs referred to in paragraph 1;
(c) the potential conflicts of interest referred to in paragraph 3;
(d) the audit methods referred to in paragraph 6; and
(e) the circumstances in which it would be appropriate, taking into account potential conflicts of interest between the members of the user committee and the CSD, to share audit findings with the user committee in accordance with paragraph 6.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 27
##### Senior management, management body and shareholders
A CSD shall:
(a) provide the competent authority with, and make public, information regarding the ownership of the CSD, and in particular, the identity and scale of interests of any parties in a position to exercise control over the operation of the CSD;
(b) inform and seek approval from its competent authority of any decision to transfer ownership rights which give rise to a change in the identity of the persons exercising control over the operation of the CSD. After receiving approval from its competent authority, the CSD shall make public the transfer of ownership rights.
Any natural or legal person shall inform without undue delay the CSD and its competent authority of a decision to acquire or dispose of its ownership rights that give rise to a change in the identity of the persons exercising control over the operation of the CSD.
#### Article 28
##### User committee
#### Article 29
##### Record keeping
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 30
##### Outsourcing
Where a CSD outsources services or activities to a third party, it shall remain fully responsible for discharging all of its obligations under this Regulation and shall comply at all times with the following conditions:
(a) outsourcing does not result in the delegation of its responsibility;
(b) the relationship and obligations of the CSD towards its participants or issuers are not altered;
(c) the conditions for the authorisation of the CSD do not effectively change;
(d) outsourcing does not prevent the exercise of supervisory and oversight functions, including on-site access to acquire any relevant information needed to fulfil those functions;
(e) outsourcing does not result in depriving the CSD of the systems and controls necessary to manage the risks it faces;
(f) the CSD retains the expertise and resources necessary for evaluating the quality of the services provided, the organisational and capital adequacy of the service provider, for supervising the outsourced services effectively and for managing the risks associated with the outsourcing on an ongoing basis;
(g) the CSD has direct access to the relevant information of the outsourced services;
(h) the service provider cooperates with the competent authority and the relevant authorities in connection with the outsourced activities;
(i) the CSD ensures that the service provider meets the standards set down by the relevant data protection law which would apply if the service providers were established in the Union. The CSD is responsible for ensuring that those standards are set out in a contract between the parties and that those standards are maintained.
#### Article 31
##### Services provided by parties other than CSDs
ESMA shall include such information in the CSD register referred to in Article 21.
## Section 2
### **Conduct of business rules**
#### Article 32
##### General provisions
#### Article 33
##### Requirements for participation
In the event of a refusal, the requesting participant has the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access.
That competent authority shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting participant with a reasoned reply.
That competent authority shall consult the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting participant on its assessment of the complaint. Where the authority of the requesting participant disagrees with the assessment provided, any one of the two competent authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to grant access to the requesting participant is deemed to be unjustified, the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access shall issue an order requiring that CSD to grant access to the requesting participant.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 34
##### Transparency
#### Article 35
##### Communication procedures with participants and other market infrastructures
CSDs shall use in their communication procedures with participants of the securities settlement systems they operate, and with the market infrastructures they interface with international open communication procedures and standards for messaging and reference data in order to facilitate efficient recording, payment and settlement.
## Section 3
### **Requirements for CSD services**
#### Article 36
##### General provisions
For each securities settlement system it operates a CSD shall have appropriate rules and procedures, including robust accounting practices and controls, to help ensure the integrity of securities issues, and reduce and manage the risks associated with the safekeeping and settlement of transactions in securities.
#### Article 37
##### Integrity of the issue
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 38
##### Protection of securities of participants and those of their clients
However, a CSD and its participants shall provide individual clients segregation for citizens and residents of, and legal persons established in, a Member State where required under the national law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted as it stands at 17 September 2014. That obligation shall apply as long as the national law is not amended or repealed and its objectives are still valid.
#### Article 39
##### Settlement finality
#### Article 40
##### Cash settlement
#### Article 41
##### Participant default rules and procedures
## Section 4
### **Prudential requirements**
#### Article 42
##### General requirements
A CSD shall adopt a sound risk-management framework for comprehensively managing legal, business, operational and other direct or indirect risks, including measures to mitigate fraud and negligence.
#### Article 43
##### Legal risks
#### Article 44
##### General business risk
A CSD shall have robust management and control systems as well as IT tools in order to identify, monitor and manage general business risks, including losses from poor execution of business strategy, cash flows and operating expenses.
#### Article 45
##### Operational risks
It shall also inform the competent authority and relevant authorities without delay of any operational incidents resulting from such risks.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 46
##### Investment policy
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 47
##### Capital requirements
Capital, together with retained earnings and reserves of a CSD, shall be proportional to the risks stemming from the activities of the CSD. It shall be at all times sufficient to:
(a) ensure that the CSD is adequately protected against operational, legal, custody, investment and business risks so that the CSD can continue to provide services as a going concern;
(b) ensure an orderly winding-down or restructuring of the CSD’s activities over an appropriate time span of at least six months under a range of stress scenarios.
A CSD shall maintain a plan for the following:
(a) the raising of additional capital should its equity capital approach or fall below the requirements laid down in paragraph 1;
(b) ensuring the orderly winding-down or restructuring of its operations and services where the CSD is unable to raise new capital.
The plan shall be approved by the management body or an appropriate committee of the management body and updated regularly. Each update of the plan shall be provided to the competent authority. The competent authority may require the CSD to take additional measures or to make any alternative provision where the competent authority considers that the CSD’s plan is insufficient.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
ESMA shall introduce in the register, that it is required to make available on its dedicated website in accordance with Article 21(3), the following information:
(a) the name of each CSD which was subject to a decision under Articles 54, 56 and 57;
(b) the name of each designated credit institution;
(c) the list of banking-type ancillary services that a designated credit institution or a CSD authorised under Article 54 is authorised to provide for the CSD’s participants.
#### Article 59
##### Prudential requirements applicable to credit institutions or CSDs authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services
A credit institution designated under point (b) of Article 54(2) or a CSD authorised under point (a) of Article 54(2) to provide banking-type ancillary services shall comply with the following specific prudential requirements for the credit risks related to those services in respect of each securities settlement system:
(a) it shall establish a robust framework to manage the corresponding credit risks;
(b) it shall identify the sources of such credit risks, frequently and regularly, measure and monitor corresponding credit exposures and use appropriate risk-management tools to control those risks;
(c) it shall fully cover corresponding credit exposures to individual borrowing participants using collateral and other equivalent financial resources;
(d) if collateral is used to manage its corresponding credit risk, it shall accept highly liquid collateral with minimal credit and market risk; it may use other types of collateral in specific situations if an appropriate haircut is applied;
(e) it shall establish and apply appropriately conservative haircuts and concentration limits on collateral values constituted to cover the credit exposures referred to in point (c), taking into account the objective of ensuring that collateral can be liquidated promptly without significant adverse price effects;
(f) it shall set limits on its corresponding credit exposures;
(g) it shall analyse and plan for how to address any potential residual credit exposures, and adopt rules and procedures to implement such plans;
(h) it shall provide credit only to participants that have cash accounts with it;
(i) it shall provide for effective reimbursement procedures of intra-day credit and discourage overnight credit through the application of sanctioning rates which act as an effective deterrent.
A credit institution designated under point (b) of Article 54(2) or a CSD authorised under point (a) of Article 54(2) to provide banking-type ancillary services shall comply with the following specific prudential requirements for the liquidity risks relating to those services in respect of each securities settlement system:
(a) it shall have a robust framework and tools to measure, monitor, and manage its liquidity risks, including intra-day liquidity risks, for each currency of the security settlement system for which it acts as settlement agent;
(b) it shall measure and monitor on an ongoing and timely basis, and at least daily, its liquidity needs and the level of liquid assets it holds; in doing so, it shall determine the value of its available liquid assets taking into account appropriate haircuts on those assets;
(c) it shall have sufficient liquid resources in all relevant currencies for a timely provision of settlement services under a wide range of potential stress scenarios including, but not limited to the liquidity risk generated by the default of at least one participant, including its parent undertakings and subsidiaries, to which it has the largest exposures;
(d) it shall mitigate the corresponding liquidity risks with qualifying liquid resources in each currency such as cash at the central bank of issue and at other creditworthy financial institutions, committed lines of credit or similar arrangements and highly liquid collateral or investments that are readily available and convertible into cash with prearranged and highly reliable funding arrangements, even in extreme but plausible market conditions and it shall identify, measure and monitor its liquidity risk stemming from the various financial institutions used for the management of its liquidity risks;
(e) where prearranged funding arrangements are used, it shall select only creditworthy financial institutions as liquidity providers; it shall establish and apply appropriate concentration limits for each of the corresponding liquidity providers including its parent undertaking and subsidiaries;
(f) it shall determine and test the sufficiency of the corresponding resources by regular and rigorous stress testing;
(g) it shall analyse and plan for how to address any unforeseen and potentially uncovered liquidity shortfalls, and adopt rules and procedures to implement such plans;
(h) where practical and available, without prejudice to the eligibility rules of the central bank, it shall have access to central bank accounts and other central bank services to enhance its management of liquidity risks and Union credit institutions shall deposit the corresponding cash balances on dedicated accounts with Union central banks of issue;
(i) it shall have prearranged and highly reliable arrangements to ensure that it can liquidate in a timely fashion the collateral provided to it by a defaulting client;
(j) it shall report regularly to the authorities referred to in Article 60(1), and disclose to the public, as to how it measures, monitors and manages its liquidity risks, including intra-day liquidity risks.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
## Section 5
### **Requirements for CSD links**
#### Article 48
##### CSD links
A link shall be supported by an appropriate contractual arrangement that sets out the respective rights and obligations of the linked CSDs and, where necessary, of the CSDs’ participants. A contractual arrangement with cross-jurisdictional implications shall provide for an unambiguous choice of law that govern each aspect of the link’s operations.
Interoperable securities settlement systems and CSDs, which use a common settlement infrastructure shall establish identical moments of:
(a) entry of transfer orders into the system;
(b) irrevocability of transfer orders.
The securities settlement systems and CSDs referred to in the first subparagraph shall use equivalent rules concerning the moment of finality of transfers of securities and cash.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Powers is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## *CHAPTER III*
### ***Access to CSDs***
## Section 1
### **Access of issuers to CSDs**
#### Article 49
##### Freedom to issue in a CSD authorised in the Union
Without prejudice to the issuer’s right referred to in the first subparagraph, the corporate or similar law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted shall continue to apply.
Member States shall ensure that a list of key relevant provisions of their law, as referred to in the second subparagraph, is compiled. Competent authorities shall communicate that list to ESMA by 18 December 2014. ESMA shall publish the list by 18 January 2015.
The CSD may charge a reasonable commercial fee for the provision of its services to issuers on a cost-plus basis, unless otherwise agreed by both parties.
In the case of a refusal, the requesting issuer shall have the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that refuses to provide its services.
The competent authority of that CSD shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal provided by the CSD and shall provide the issuer with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the CSD shall consult the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting issuer on its assessment of the complaint. Where the competent authority of the place of establishment of the requesting issuer disagrees with that assessment, any one of the two competent authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to provide its services to an issuer is deemed to be unjustified, the responsible competent authority shall issue an order requiring the CSD to provide its services to the requesting issuer.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 2
### **Access between CSDs**
#### Article 50
##### Standard link access
A CSD shall have the right to become a participant of another CSD and set up a standard link with that CSD in accordance with Article 33 and subject to the prior notification of the CSD link provided under Article 19(5).
#### Article 51
##### Customised link access
#### Article 52
##### Procedure for CSD links
Where a CSD refuses access, it shall provide the requesting CSD with full reasons for its refusal.
In the case of a refusal, the requesting CSD has the right to complain to the competent authority of the CSD that has refused access.
The competent authority of the receiving CSD shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting CSD with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the receiving CSD shall consult the competent authority of the requesting CSD and the relevant authority of the requesting CSD referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) on its assessment of the complaint. Where any of the authorities of the requesting CSD disagrees with the assessment provided, any one of the authorities may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by the CSD to grant access to the requesting CSD is deemed to be unjustified, the competent authority of the receiving CSD shall issue an order requiring that CSD to grant access to the requesting CSD.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## Section 3
### **Access between a CSD and another market infrastructure**
#### Article 53
##### Access between a CSD and another market infrastructure
A CSD shall provide access to its securities settlement systems on a non-discriminatory and transparent basis to a CCP or a trading venue and may charge a reasonable commercial fee for such access on a cost-plus basis, unless otherwise agreed by both parties.
A party that refuses access shall provide the requesting party with full written reasons for such refusal based on a comprehensive risk assessment. In the case of a refusal, the requesting party has the right to complain to the competent authority of the party that has refused access.
The competent authority of the receiving party and the relevant authority referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) shall duly examine the complaint by assessing the reasons for refusal and shall provide the requesting party with a reasoned reply.
The competent authority of the receiving party shall consult the competent authority of the requesting party and the relevant authority referred to in point (a) of Article 12(1) on its assessment of the complaint. Where any of the authorities of the requesting party disagrees with the assessment provided, any of them may refer the matter to ESMA, which may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it under Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where the refusal by a party to grant access is deemed to be unjustified, the responsible competent authority shall issue an order requiring that party to grant access to its services within three months.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
## TITLE IV
### **PROVISION OF BANKING-TYPE ANCILLARY SERVICES FOR CSD PARTICIPANTS**
#### Article 54
##### Authorisation and designation to provide banking-type ancillary services
A CSD that intends to settle the cash leg of all or part of its securities settlement system in accordance with Article 40(2) or otherwise wishes to provide any banking-type ancillary services referred to in paragraph 1 shall be authorised either:
(a) to offer such services itself under the conditions specified in this Article; or
(b) to designate for that purpose one or more credit institutions authorised in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Where a CSD seeks to provide any banking-type ancillary services from within the same legal entity as the legal entity operating the securities settlement system the authorisation referred to in paragraph 2 shall be granted only where the following conditions are met:
(a) the CSD is authorised as a credit institution as provided for in Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU;
(b) the CSD meets the prudential requirements laid down in Article 59(1), (3) and (4) and the supervisory requirements laid down in Article 60;
(c) the authorisation referred to in point (a) of this subparagraph is used only to provide the banking-type ancillary services referred to in Section C of the Annex and not to carry out any other activities;
(d) the CSD is subject to an additional capital surcharge that reflects the risks, including credit and liquidity risks, resulting from the provision of intra-day credit, inter alia, to the participants in a securities settlement system or other users of CSD services;
(e) the CSD reports at least monthly to the competent authority and annually as a part of its public disclosure as required under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on the extent and management of intra-day liquidity risk in accordance with point (j) of Article 59(4) of this Regulation;
(f) the CSD has submitted to the competent authority an adequate recovery plan to ensure continuity of its critical operations, including in situations where liquidity or credit risk crystallises as a result of the provision of banking-type ancillary services.
In the case of conflicting provisions laid down in this Regulation, in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and in Directive 2013/36/EU, the CSD referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph shall comply with the stricter requirements on prudential supervision. The regulatory technical standards referred to in Articles 47 and 59 of this Regulation shall clarify the cases of conflicting provisions.
Where a CSD seeks to designate a credit institution to provide any banking-type ancillary services from within a separate legal entity which may be part of the same group of undertakings ultimately controlled by the same parent undertaking or not, the authorisation referred to in paragraph 2 shall be granted only where the following conditions are met:
(a) the separate legal entity is authorised as a credit institution as provided for in Article 8 of Directive 2013/36/EU;
(b) the separate legal entity meets the prudential requirements laid down in Article 59(1), (3) and (4) and supervisory requirements laid down in Article 60;
(c) the separate legal entity does not itself carry out any of the core services referred to in Section A of the Annex;
(d) the authorisation referred to in point (a) is used only to provide the banking-type ancillary services referred to in Section C of the Annex and not to carry out any other activities;
(e) the separate legal entity is subject to an additional capital surcharge that reflects the risks, including credit and liquidity risks, resulting from the provision of intra-day credit, inter alia, to the participants in a securities settlement system or other users of CSD services;
(f) the separate legal entity reports at least monthly to the competent authority and annually as a part of its public disclosure as required under Part Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on the extent and management of intra-day liquidity risk in accordance with point (j) of Article 59(4) of this Regulation; and
(g) the separate legal entity has submitted to the competent authority an adequate recovery plan to ensure continuity of its critical operations, including in situations where liquidity or credit risk crystallises as a result of the provision of banking-type ancillary services from within a separate legal entity.
The competent authority shall monitor at least once per year that the threshold defined in the first subparagraph is respected and report its findings to ESMA. Where the competent authority determines that the threshold has been exceeded, it shall require the CSD concerned to seek authorisation in accordance with paragraph 4. The CSD concerned shall submit its application for authorisation within six months.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
#### Article 55
##### Procedure for granting and refusing authorisation to provide banking-type ancillary services
From the moment when the application is considered to be complete, the competent authority shall transmit all information included in the application to the following authorities:
(a) the relevant authorities;
(b) the competent authority referred to in point (40) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
(c) the competent authorities in the Member States where the CSD has established interoperable links with another CSD except where the CSD has established interoperable links referred to in Article 19(5);
(d) the competent authorities in the host Member State where the activities of the CSD are of substantial importance for the functioning of the securities markets and the protection of investors within the meaning of Article 24(4);
(e) the competent authorities responsible for the supervision of the participants of the CSD that are established in the three Member States with the largest settlement values in the CSD’s securities settlement system on an aggregate basis over a one-year period;
(f) ESMA; and
(g) EBA.
Where at least one of the authorities referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 4 issues a negative reasoned opinion, the competent authority wishing to grant the authorisation shall within 30 days provide the authorities referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 4 with a reasoned decision addressing the negative opinion.
Where 30 days after that decision has been presented any of the authorities referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 4 issues a negative opinion and the competent authority still wishes to grant the authorisation any of the authorities that issued a negative opinion may refer the matter to ESMA for assistance under point (c) of Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Where 30 days after referral to ESMA the issue is not settled, the competent authority wishing to grant the authorisation shall take the final decision and provide a detailed explanation of its decision in writing to the authorities referred to in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 4.
Where the competent authority wishes to refuse authorisation, the matter shall not be referred to ESMA.
Negative opinions shall state in writing the full and detailed reasons why the requirements laid down in this Regulation or other parts of Union law are not met.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA shall submit those draft implementing technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is conferred on the Commission to adopt the implementing technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
#### Article 56
##### Extension of the banking-type ancillary services
#### Article 57
##### Withdrawal of authorisation
Without prejudice to any remedial actions or measures under Title V, the competent authority of the CSD’s home Member State shall withdraw the authorisations referred to in Article 54 in any of the following circumstances:
(a) where the CSD has not made use of the authorisation within 12 months, expressly renounces the authorisation or where the designated credit institution has provided no services or performed no activity for the preceding six months;
(b) where the CSD has obtained the authorisation by making false statements or by any other unlawful means;
(c) where the CSD or the designated credit institution is no longer in compliance with the conditions under which authorisation was granted and has not taken the remedial actions requested by the competent authority within a set time-frame;
(d) where the CSD or the designated credit institution has seriously and systematically infringed the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
#### Article 58
##### CSD register
ESMA shall introduce in the register, that it is required to make available on its dedicated website in accordance with Article 21(3), the following information:
(a) the name of each CSD which was subject to a decision under Articles 54, 56 and 57;
(b) the name of each designated credit institution;
(c) the list of banking-type ancillary services that a designated credit institution or a CSD authorised under Article 54 is authorised to provide for the CSD’s participants.
#### Article 59
##### Prudential requirements applicable to credit institutions or CSDs authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services
A credit institution designated under point (b) of Article 54(2) or a CSD authorised under point (a) of Article 54(2) to provide banking-type ancillary services shall comply with the following specific prudential requirements for the credit risks related to those services in respect of each securities settlement system:
(a) it shall establish a robust framework to manage the corresponding credit risks;
(b) it shall identify the sources of such credit risks, frequently and regularly, measure and monitor corresponding credit exposures and use appropriate risk-management tools to control those risks;
(c) it shall fully cover corresponding credit exposures to individual borrowing participants using collateral and other equivalent financial resources;
(d) if collateral is used to manage its corresponding credit risk, it shall accept highly liquid collateral with minimal credit and market risk; it may use other types of collateral in specific situations if an appropriate haircut is applied;
(e) it shall establish and apply appropriately conservative haircuts and concentration limits on collateral values constituted to cover the credit exposures referred to in point (c), taking into account the objective of ensuring that collateral can be liquidated promptly without significant adverse price effects;
(f) it shall set limits on its corresponding credit exposures;
(g) it shall analyse and plan for how to address any potential residual credit exposures, and adopt rules and procedures to implement such plans;
(h) it shall provide credit only to participants that have cash accounts with it;
(i) it shall provide for effective reimbursement procedures of intra-day credit and discourage overnight credit through the application of sanctioning rates which act as an effective deterrent.
A credit institution designated under point (b) of Article 54(2) or a CSD authorised under point (a) of Article 54(2) to provide banking-type ancillary services shall comply with the following specific prudential requirements for the liquidity risks relating to those services in respect of each securities settlement system:
(a) it shall have a robust framework and tools to measure, monitor, and manage its liquidity risks, including intra-day liquidity risks, for each currency of the security settlement system for which it acts as settlement agent;
(b) it shall measure and monitor on an ongoing and timely basis, and at least daily, its liquidity needs and the level of liquid assets it holds; in doing so, it shall determine the value of its available liquid assets taking into account appropriate haircuts on those assets;
(c) it shall have sufficient liquid resources in all relevant currencies for a timely provision of settlement services under a wide range of potential stress scenarios including, but not limited to the liquidity risk generated by the default of at least one participant, including its parent undertakings and subsidiaries, to which it has the largest exposures;
(d) it shall mitigate the corresponding liquidity risks with qualifying liquid resources in each currency such as cash at the central bank of issue and at other creditworthy financial institutions, committed lines of credit or similar arrangements and highly liquid collateral or investments that are readily available and convertible into cash with prearranged and highly reliable funding arrangements, even in extreme but plausible market conditions and it shall identify, measure and monitor its liquidity risk stemming from the various financial institutions used for the management of its liquidity risks;
(e) where prearranged funding arrangements are used, it shall select only creditworthy financial institutions as liquidity providers; it shall establish and apply appropriate concentration limits for each of the corresponding liquidity providers including its parent undertaking and subsidiaries;
(f) it shall determine and test the sufficiency of the corresponding resources by regular and rigorous stress testing;
(g) it shall analyse and plan for how to address any unforeseen and potentially uncovered liquidity shortfalls, and adopt rules and procedures to implement such plans;
(h) where practical and available, without prejudice to the eligibility rules of the central bank, it shall have access to central bank accounts and other central bank services to enhance its management of liquidity risks and Union credit institutions shall deposit the corresponding cash balances on dedicated accounts with Union central banks of issue;
(i) it shall have prearranged and highly reliable arrangements to ensure that it can liquidate in a timely fashion the collateral provided to it by a defaulting client;
(j) it shall report regularly to the authorities referred to in Article 60(1), and disclose to the public, as to how it measures, monitors and manages its liquidity risks, including intra-day liquidity risks.
EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 18 June 2015.
Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
#### Article 60
##### Supervision of designated credit institutions and CSDs authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services
The competent authorities referred to in the first subparagraph shall also be responsible for the supervision of designated credit institutions and CSDs referred to in that subparagraph as regards their compliance with the prudential requirements referred to in Article 59 of this Regulation.
The competent authorities referred to in the first subparagraph shall regularly, and at least once a year, assess whether the designated credit institution or CSD authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services complies with Article 59 and shall inform the competent authority of the CSD which shall then inform the authorities referred to in Article 55(4), of the results, including any remedial actions or penalties, of its supervision under this paragraph.
The competent authority of the CSD shall, after consulting competent authorities referred to paragraph 1, review and evaluate at least on an annual basis the following:
The competent authorities referred to in the first subparagraph shall regularly, and at least every two years, assess whether the designated credit institution or CSD authorised to provide banking-type ancillary services complies with Article 59 and shall inform the competent authority of the CSD which shall then inform the authorities referred to in Article 55(4) and, where applicable, the college referred to in Article 24a, of the results, including any remedial actions or penalties, of its supervision under this paragraph.
The competent authority of the CSD shall, after consulting the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 and the relevant authorities, review and evaluate at least every two years the following:
(a) in the case referred to in point (b) of Article 54(2), whether all the necessary arrangements between the designated credit institutions and the CSD allow them to meet their obligations as laid down in this Regulation;
(b) in the case referred to in point (a) of Article 54(2), whether the arrangements relating to the authorisation to provide banking-type ancillary services allow the CSD to meet its obligations as laid down in this Regulation.
The competent authority of the CSD shall regularly, and at least once a year, inform the authorities referred to in Article 55(4) of the results, including any remedial actions or penalties, of its review and evaluation under this paragraph.
The competent authority of the CSD shall regularly, and at least every two years, inform the authorities referred to in Article 55(4) and, where applicable, the college referred to in Article 24a, of the results, including any remedial actions or penalties, of its review and evaluation under this paragraph.
Where a CSD designates an authorised credit institution in accordance with Article 54, in view of the protection of the participants in the securities settlement systems it operates, a CSD shall ensure that it has access from the credit institution it designates to all necessary information for the purpose of this Regulation and it shall report any infringements thereof to the competent authority of the CSD and to competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1.
@@ -1157,6 +1485,28 @@
##### Transitional provisions
A third-country CSD that provides the core services referred to in Section A, points 1 and 2, of the Annex in relation to financial instruments constituted under the law of a Member State referred to in Article 49(1), second subparagraph, pursuant to the applicable national rules on recognition of third-country CSDs shall notify ESMA thereof within two years of 16 January 2024.
ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the information that the third-country CSD is required to provide to ESMA in the notification referred to in the second subparagraph. Such information shall be limited to what is strictly necessary including, where applicable and available:
(a) the number of participants to whom the third-country CSD provides or intends to provide the services referred to in the second subparagraph;
(b) the categories of financial instruments in respect of which the third-country CSD provides such services; and
(c) the total volume and value of such financial instruments.
ESMA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 17 January 2025.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
The delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 7(15), points (a), (b) and (g), as applicable before 16 January 2024 shall continue to apply until the date of application of the delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 7(10).
A CSD that, in another Member State, provided core services referred to in Section A, points 1 and 2, of the Annex or set up a branch in accordance with Article 23 as applicable before 16 January 2024 shall be subject to the procedure set out in Article 23(3) to (6) only in relation to:
(a) the setting up of a new branch;
(b) a change in the range of those services.
#### Article 70
##### Amendments to Directive 98/26/EC
@@ -1185,12 +1535,6 @@
(3) in Section B of Annex I, point (1) is replaced by the following:
‘(1)Safekeeping and administration of financial instruments for the account of clients, including custodianship and related services such as cash/collateral management and excluding providing and maintaining securities accounts at the top tier level (‘central maintenance service’) referred to in point (2) of Section A of the Annex to the Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.’.
#### Article 72
##### Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 236/2012
Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 is deleted.
#### Article 73
##### Application of Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 600/2014
@@ -1227,11 +1571,50 @@
(k) the application of the sanctions and in particular the need to further harmonise the administrative sanctions for the infringement of the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
#### Article 75
By 17 January 2025 and every two years thereafter, ESMA, in close cooperation with the members of the ESCB, shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the assessment regarding the potential shortening of the period referred to in Article 5(2), first sentence (‘settlement cycle’). That report shall include all of the following:
(a) an assessment of the appropriateness of shortening the settlement cycle and the potential impact of such shortening on CSDs, trading venues and other market participants;
(b) an assessment of the costs and benefits of shortening the settlement cycle in the Union, differentiating, where appropriate, between different financial instruments and categories of transactions;
(c) a detailed outline of how to move to a shorter settlement cycle, differentiating, where appropriate, between different financial instruments and categories of transactions;
(d) an overview of international developments on settlement cycles and their impact on the Union’s capital markets.
Upon the request of the Commission, ESMA shall provide a cost-benefit analysis of the introduction of the mandatory buy-in process. Such cost-benefit analysis shall consist of the following elements:
(a) the average duration of settlement fails with respect to the financial instruments or categories of transactions in those financial instruments to which mandatory buy-ins could apply;
(b) the impact of the introduction of the mandatory buy-in process on the Union market, including an assessment of the underlying causes of the settlement fails to which mandatory buy-ins could apply and an analysis of the implications of subjecting specific financial instruments and categories of transactions to mandatory buy-ins;
(c) the application of a similar buy-in process in comparable third-country markets and the impact on the competitiveness of the Union market;
(d) any clear impact on financial stability in the Union stemming from settlement fails;
(e) any clear impact on fragmentation of the Union’s capital markets stemming from diverging settlement efficiency rates, including the reasons for such divergence and appropriate measures to limit it.
That report shall cover at least the shaping of transaction sizes, the partial settlement of failing trades and the use of auto-lend/borrow programmes.
Thereafter, ESMA, after consulting the members of the ESCB, shall report every three years on any potential additional tools to improve settlement efficiency in the Union. In cases where no new tools have been identified, ESMA shall inform the Commission thereof and shall not be required to provide a report.
#### Article 75
##### Review
By 18 September 2019, the Commission shall review and prepare a general report on this Regulation. That report shall, in particular, assess the matters referred to in points (a) to (k) of Article 74(1), whether there are other substantive barriers to competition in relation to the services subject to this Regulation which are insufficiently addressed and the potential need for further measures to limit the impact on taxpayers of the failure of CSDs. The Commission shall submit the report to the European Parliament and to the Council, together with any appropriate proposals.
By 17 January 2029, the Commission shall review and prepare a general report on this Regulation. The Commission shall, in particular, assess:
(a) the matters referred to in Article 74(1), points (a) to (l), establish whether there are substantive barriers to competition in relation to the services subject to this Regulation which are insufficiently addressed and consider the potential need to apply further measures to:
(i) improve settlement efficiency;
(ii) limit the impact on taxpayers of the failure of CSDs;
(iii) address any identified competition or financial stability issues related to internalised settlement;
(iv) minimise barriers to cross-border settlement;
(v) ensure adequate powers and information for authorities to monitor risks;
(b) the functioning of the regulatory and supervisory framework for Union CSDs, especially those CSDs whose activities are of substantial importance for the functioning of securities markets and the protection of investors in the Union in at least two host Member States, focusing in particular on the cross-border provision of services, potential risks for clients and participants of CSDs, investor protection and the financial stability in the Union;
(c) the functioning and scope of the Union regulatory and supervisory framework for third-country CSDs, in particular the supervision of such CSDs when providing services in the Union, including the role of ESMA.
The Commission shall submit the report to the European Parliament and to the Council, together with any appropriate proposals.
#### Article 76
2022-06-22
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central se
2016-07-01
improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central
original version
Text at this date