The Gatwick Airport (Northern Runway Project) Development Consent Order 2025

• (1) No part of the authorised development is to commence until a landscape and ecology management plan for that part has been submitted to and approved in writing by CBC (in consultation with RBBC, MVDC or TDC to the extent that they are the relevant planning authority for any land to which the submitted plan relates).

• (2) Where a landscape and ecology management plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) relates to highways works, CBC must approve it also in consultation with the relevant highway authority.

• (3) Each landscape and ecology management plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the outline landscape and ecology management plan and must include a timetable for the implementation of the landscaping works it contains.

• (4) The relevant part of the authorised development must be carried out in accordance with the relevant landscape and ecology management plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC.

• (5) In respect of any landscape and ecology management plan for Work No. 40 (works associated with land to the north east of Longbridge Roundabout), the references in this requirement to “CBC” are to be read as “MVDC”.

Contaminated land and groundwater

9

• (1) In respect of any part of the authorised development where historical data cannot establish that the risk of contaminated land is low, the undertaker must conduct ground investigations prior to that part of the authorised development being commenced. The scope of these investigations must be agreed with the relevant planning authority (in consultation with the Environment Agency on matters related to its functions).

• (2) In the event that land affected by contamination, including groundwater, is found at any time when constructing the authorised development which was not previously identified in the environmental statement, it must be reported as soon as reasonably practicable to the relevant planning authority and the Environment Agency, and the undertaker must complete a risk assessment of the contamination in consultation with the relevant planning authority and the Environment Agency.

• (3) Where the undertaker’s risk assessment determines that remediation of contamination identified in, on, or under land from detailed site investigations, or as an unexpected discovery, is necessary, a remediation strategy comprising a written scheme and programme for the remedial measures to be taken to render the land fit for its intended purpose must be submitted to and approved in writing by the relevant planning authority (in consultation with the Environment Agency on matters related to its functions).

• (4) Any required and agreed remediation must be carried out in accordance with the remediation strategy approved under sub-paragraph (3).

• (5) The remediation strategy submitted for approval pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) is to include a verification plan providing details of the data that will be collected in order to demonstrate that the works set out in the remediation strategy are complete and identifying any requirements for longer-term monitoring of pollutant linkages, maintenance and arrangements for contingency action.

• (6) Prior to the relevant part of the authorised development being occupied or used (as relevant) a verification report demonstrating the completion of works set out in the approved remediation strategy and the effectiveness of the remediation will be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the relevant planning authority. The report will include results of sampling and monitoring carried out in accordance with the approved verification plan to demonstrate that the site remediation criteria have been met.

Surface and foul water drainage

10

• (1) No part of the authorised development involving surface or foul water drainage (except for the highway works and listed works) is to commence until CBC has been consulted on the drainage for that part.

• (2) Consultation under sub-paragraph (1) shall take place by—

• (a) the undertaker providing CBC with an explanatory note, drawings (where necessary) and a compliance statement regarding the drainage of the part in question; and

• (b) CBC providing its comments (if any) within 8 weeks beginning with the day after the information was provided to CBC pursuant to sub-paragraph (2)(a), unless a longer time period is agreed in writing between CBC and the undertaker.

• (3) Any part of the authorised development to which sub-paragraph (1) applies must be carried out in accordance with the drainage design principles in appendix 1 of the design and access statement unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC.

• (4) No part of any listed works involving surface or foul water drainage is to commence until details of the surface and foul water drainage for that part, including means of pollution control and monitoring, have been submitted to and approved in writing by CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, the Environment Agency and Thames Water Utilities Limited).

• (5) The drainage details referred to in sub-paragraph (4) must include those of the following that are reasonably considered necessary for the part of the listed work in question by CBC—

• (a) an explanatory note;

• (b) drawings;

• (c) a compliance statement;

• (d) details of layout, siting, scale, external appearance and levels;

• (e) details of any associated structures;

• (f) details of any construction and sustainability measures; and

• (g) for part of a work that is subject to design review in accordance with annex A of appendix 1 of the design and access statement, the relevant “Design Review Statement” as defined in that annex A.

• (6) The relevant part of the listed works must be constructed in accordance with the details approved under sub-paragraph (4) unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, the Environment Agency and Thames Water Utilities Limited).

• (7) In this requirement “compliance statement” means a document that sets out how the part of the authorised development in question will be constructed in accordance with the drainage design principles in appendix 1 of the design and access statement unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC.

Local highway surface water drainage

11

• (1) No part of the local highway works is to commence until written details of the surface water drainage for that part, including means of pollution control and monitoring, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the relevant highway authority (in consultation with the Environment Agency, the relevant lead local flood authority and the relevant planning authority).

• (2) The drainage details approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the surface access drainage strategy.

• (3) The relevant part of the local highway works must be constructed in accordance with the details approved under sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing by the relevant highway authority (in consultation with the Environment Agency and the relevant lead local flood authority).

Construction traffic management plan

12

• (1) No part of the authorised development is to commence until a construction traffic management plan for that part has been submitted to and approved in writing by CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, Surrey County Council and National Highways on matters related to their function).

• (2) The construction traffic management plan submitted under sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the outline construction traffic management plan.

• (3) The relevant part of the authorised development must be constructed in accordance with the construction traffic management plan referred to in sub-paragraph (1), unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, Surrey County Council and National Highways on matters related to their function).

Construction workforce travel plan

13

• (1) No part of the authorised development is to commence until a construction workforce travel plan for that part has been submitted to and approved in writing by CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, Surrey County Council and National Highways on matters related to their function).

• (2) The construction workforce travel plan submitted under sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the outline construction workforce travel plan.

• (3) The relevant part of the authorised development must be constructed in accordance with the construction workforce travel plan referred to in sub-paragraph (1), unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council, Surrey County Council and National Highways on matters related to their function).

Archaeological remains

14

• (1) Work No. 34(b) (Car Park B North) must be carried out in accordance with the written scheme of investigation for Surrey unless otherwise agreed in writing by Surrey County Council.

• (2) Any part of the authorised development in West Sussex must be carried out in accordance with the written scheme of investigation for West Sussex unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC.

• (3) Any archaeological remains not previously identified which are revealed when carrying out the authorised development must be retained in situ and reported to the relevant authority and Historic England as soon as reasonably practicable from the date they are identified.

• (4) No construction operations are to take place within 10 metres of the remains referred to in sub-paragraph (3) for a period of 14 days from the date of any report under sub-paragraph (3).

• (5) If the relevant authority determines in writing that the archaeological remains require further investigation, no construction operations are to take place within 10 metres of the remains until provision has been made for the further investigation and recording of the remains in accordance with details to be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the relevant authority in consultation with Historic England.

• (6) Construction operations which would otherwise be prohibited by sub-paragraphs (4) or (5) permitted to the extent that they are—

• (a) agreed in writing by the relevant authority in consultation with Historic England; or

• (b) necessary to address a potential risk identified by the undertaker to the safety of the authorised development or any of its parts, the public or the surrounding environment (in which case the undertaker must promptly notify the relevant authority and Historic England in writing of the operations which it has carried out).

• (7) In this requirement, the “relevant authority” means—

• (a) in respect of any land in West Sussex, CBC; and

• (b) in respect of any land in Surrey, Surrey County Council.

Air noise limits

15

• (1) The undertaker shall not operate the airport for dual runway operations unless the air noise contour enclosed areas set out in Table 1 are complied with.

Air noise contour	Enclosed area from the first to fifth year of dual runway operations	Enclosed area from the sixth year of dual runway operations
51 dB LAeq 16 h	135 km ²	125 km²
45 dB LAeq 8 h	146 km²	135 km²

• (2) Air noise contour reports shall be published annually by the undertaker to demonstrate compliance with this requirement, as soon as is reasonably practicable following the first year and subsequent years of dual runway operations. The air noise contour enclosed areas set out in Table 1 are to be calculated using the Civil Aviation Authority’s Environmental Research and Consultancy Department Aircraft Noise Contour model, version 2.4 or later.

• (3) The undertaker may submit a detailed written response to the Secretary of State to amend the air noise contour enclosed areas in Table 1 set out in sub-paragraph (1) in relation to any extraordinary review circumstances and, where approved by the Secretary of State, the air noise contour enclosed areas in Table 1 are to be read as amended in accordance with the decision of the Secretary of State.

• (4) A request to the Secretary of State under sub-paragraph (3) is to be made in accordance with the following process—

• (a) the undertaker must submit its detailed written request to the Secretary of State and the Secretary of State must provide the undertaker with an email address and postal address to which comments may be provided by interested parties on the request and specify a time limit (that is to comment on the undertaker’s notification under paragraph (b)) within which comments may be provided;

• (b) the undertaker must notify the persons listed in section 42(1) (duty to consult) of the 2008 Act and state that comments may be provided to the email address or postal address provided by the Secretary of State within the time limit specified by the Secretary of State;

• (c) after the conclusion of the time period for comments, the Secretary of State may make any further arrangements that are considered necessary or proportionate for making a decision and then proceed to make a decision to accept or refuse the request. The decision is to be notified to the undertaker and the undertaker is to be responsible for publishing that notification on a website maintained by the undertaker or on another publicly accessible website; and

• (d) the Secretary of State may agree in writing with the undertaker any amendment to this process.

• (5) Where the airport is operated for dual runway operations in excess of the air noise contour enclosed areas in Table 1, it is not a breach of the terms of this Order for the purposes of Part 8 of the 2008 Act if the exceedance is due to action taken in emergency circumstances in which there was reasonable cause for apprehending injury to persons or serious damage to property.

• (6) In this requirement, “extraordinary review circumstances” means circumstances outside the control of the undertaker which affect the noise environment at or around the airport, including but not limited to implementation of an airspace change.

• (7) Following the end of the ninth year of the scheme or when commercial air transport movements (take-offs and landings) reach 382,000, the undertaker will review the air noise limits every five years, with contour limits being put in place as measured by the summer season average day.

• (8) To ensure compliance with future noise limits, the undertaker will report compliance with the air noise limits and produce five yearly forecasts to project compliance which will be independently assessed by the CAA.

• (9) In this requirement—

• “detailed written request” should include details of the circumstances surrounding the request and the expected timeframe for resolution; and

• “time limit” means a period of consultation of four weeks, which could be varied on a request from the undertaker where the Secretary of State considers the circumstances appropriate to vary the time limit.

16

Not used.

Verification of air noise monitoring equipment

17

Within not more than six months following the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the commencement of dual runway operations and at 5 yearly intervals thereafter the undertaker must submit to the independent air noise reviewer a noise model verification report and the undertaker must publish on a website (including a page on a website) hosted by the undertaker for that purpose each noise model verification report submitted to the independent air noise reviewer within not more than 14 days after the date of its submission.

Receptor-based noise mitigation

18

• (1) Within not more than 3 months following the commencement of any of Work Nos. 1 – 7 (inclusive) or 18 (replacement western noise mitigation bund), the undertaker is to submit for approval to the relevant local planning authority—

• (a) a list of premises forecast to be potentially eligible premises at or after the commencement of dual runway operations (using the most recent available forecast at that time); and

• (b) details of how the provision of a package of receptor-based noise mitigation measures is to be promoted to those potentially eligible premises and how an owner (or occupier with the owner’s prior written consent) of such premises may apply for such a package.

• (2) Within not more than 3 months following the approval of the list and details in sub-paragraph (1), the undertaker must take the steps approved under sub-paragraph (1)(b) to notify the owners and occupiers of all eligible premises that the premises are eligible for the design and installation of a package of receptor based mitigation measures.

• (3) The undertaker must submit for approval by the relevant local planning authority details of the specific receptor-based mitigation measures for each eligible non-residential premises and the details submitted to the relevant planning authority must be—

• (a) reasonably expected to achieve the standards set out in section (c) of the noise insulation scheme document; and

• (b) comprised of measures selected from the list set out in section (d) of the noise insulation scheme document.

• (4) The maximum sums of money to be provided by the undertaker towards the package of receptor-based mitigation measures for eligible residential premises are as follows (plus VAT)—

• (a) inner zone - no limit;

• (b) outer zone 1 - £6,500; and

• (c) outer zone 2 - £4,500.

• (5) The maximum sum of money to be provided by the undertaker towards the package of receptor-based mitigation measures for non-residential premises is £250,000 (plus VAT) per applicant, per building or group of buildings in the same occupation and location.

• (6) Within not more than—

• (a) 12 months (for eligible premises with the inner zone); or

• (b) 24 months (for eligible premises with outer zone 1 or outer zone 2),

of receipt of a valid application for receptor-based mitigation measures from an owner (or occupier with the owner’s prior written consent) of eligible premises, the undertaker must, subject to access being granted to the premises, carry out a survey of those premises and submit for the agreement of the owner a specific package of receptor-based mitigation measures proposed to be installed at those premises.

• (7) In terms of eligible properties within the inner zone, the provision of a package of receptor-based noise mitigations is to include a dynamic thermal modelling report undertaken in line with the requirements set out in in the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineer’s TM59: “Design methodology for the assessment of overheating risk in homes” (2017) or any later version.

• (8) The specific package submitted under sub-paragraph (6) must be for—

• (a) eligible residential premises, reasonably expected to achieve the standard set out in section (a) of the noise insulation scheme document and comprised of measures selected from the list set out in section (b) of the noise insulation scheme document; or

• (b) for eligible non-residential premises, in accordance with the specific package approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (3).

• (9) The undertaker is not obliged by anything in this requirement to install any receptor-based mitigation measures that are declined by an owner of eligible premises.

• (10) Where any eligible premises is a listed building, the undertaker is to submit (at the cost of the undertaker) the necessary application for the required consents following any requirements of the local conservation officer and Historic England’s guidance Energy Efficiency and Historic Buildings, Secondary Glazing for Windows, 2016 (or successor guidance).

• (11) If—

• (a) a relevant local planning authority refuses to approve the list of premises or promotion details pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) or fails to communicate a decision with 8 weeks of the submission of the list and/or details by the undertaker;

• (b) a relevant local planning authority refuses to approve details of the specific receptor-based mitigation measures pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) or fails to communicate a decision within 8 weeks of the submission of the details by the undertaker; or

• (c) an owner rejects the specific package of receptor-based mitigation measures proposed by the undertaker pursuant to sub-paragraph (6) on the basis that they consider that the package does not comply with sub-paragraph (7),

the undertaker, the relevant local planning authority or the owner (as relevant) may refer the matter to the noise insultation scheme independent panel.

• (12) Upon a referral pursuant to sub-paragraph (11), the noise insultation scheme independent panel may—

• (a) make a decision to approve details in place of the relevant local authority pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) or (3); or

• (b) confirm that the package of measures proposed to an owner pursuant to sub-paragraph (6) complies with sub-paragraph (7) or otherwise specify a revised package of measures that complies with sub-paragraph (7) that the undertaker is to be required to submit to the owner.

• (13) Subject to—

• (a) a relevant owner or occupier having made a valid application to the undertaker not less than two years from the date on which they were notified of their eligibility for receptor-based noise mitigation measures under sub-paragraph (2);

• (b) agreement by the owner or occupier of the eligible premises to the specific package of measures pursuant to sub-paragraph (6); and

• (c) if the eligible premises is a listed building, the grant of the necessary consents not less than 12 months prior to the relevant event,

the agreed package of receptor-based mitigation measures are to be installed and commissioned before the later of the commencement of dual runway operations or the year in which the premises is forecast to be within the relevant contour that rendered it a potentially eligible premises (using the most recent available forecast at that time).

• (14) Subsequent to the commencement of dual runway operations and annually thereafter the undertaker and the relevant local planning authority are to carry out modelling and with the relevant local planning authority to identify additional potentially eligible premises or adjustments to the specification of the measures provided, in the manner set out in section (e) and section (f) of the noise insulation scheme document. With regard to any such premises the undertaker must offer, design, install and commission a package of receptor-based mitigation measures that accords with the other provisions of this requirement as soon as reasonably practicable.

• (15) The undertaker must notify each owner or occupier of an eligible residential premises which is within the LAeq 66 dB air noise contour (as modelled based on actual operations of the previous summer following the commencement of dual runway operations) of their eligibility to receive a payment covering estate agent fees up to 1% of the purchase price and stamp duty costs to be met in full and any other reasonable moving costs (such as removals and storage) when requested by the owner, subject always to such entitlement being strictly limited to one claim per eligible premises.

• (16) Any dispute as to the costs offered or sought under sub-paragraph (15) may be referred by the undertaker or the relevant homeowner to the noise insulation scheme independent panel, which can decide whether the amount offered or sought is compliant with that sub-paragraph.

• (17) In this requirement—

• “ambient noise” means the ambient noise levels assessed in the manner set out in section (f) of the noise insulation scheme document;

• “eligible premises” means premises approved in writing by the relevant local planning authority pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) after its consideration of potentially eligible premises provided by the undertaker (and “eligible residential premises” and “eligible non-residential premises” mean the same as regards “potentially eligible residential premises” and “potentially eligible non-residential premises” respectively);

• “inner zone” means the area which is predicted to be within the LAeq 8 h 55 dB contour or the LAeq 16 h 60 dB contour following the commencement of dual runway operations;

• “noise insulation scheme independent panel” means the panel of experts that shall be established by the undertaker prior to Work Nos. 1 – 7 inclusive or 18 (replacement western noise mitigation bund), the composition, appointment and operation of which are described in section (g) of the noise insulation scheme document but in addition, in terms of the composition of the panel the Joint Local Authorities are to be consulted in selecting the members of the Independent Panel;

• “noise insulation scheme document” means the document of that description certified by the Secretary of State under article 50 (certification of documents, etc);

• “outer zone 1” means the area which is predicted to be within the LAeq 16 h 57 dB to 60 dB contour following the commencement of dual runway operations;

• “outer zone 2” means the area which is predicted to within the LAeq 16 h 54 dB to 57 dB or within the LAeq 8 h 48 dB to LAeq 16 h 54 dB contour following the commencement of dual runway operations;

• “potentially eligible premises” means potentially eligible non-residential premises and potentially eligible residential premises;

• “potentially eligible non-residential premises” means— a school or college where, following the commencement of dual runway operations, (a) air noise or (b) ground noise alone or in combination with air noise, which is above ambient noise, is predicted to exceed LAeq 16 h 51 dB; or a hospital, library, place of worship or noise sensitive community building where, following the commencement of dual runway operations, (a) air noise or (b) ground noise alone or in combination with air noise, which is above ambient noise, is predicted to exceed LAeq 16 h 63 dB;

• “potentially eligible residential premises” means a main residence where, following the commencement of dual runway operations, (a) air noise or (b) ground noise alone or in combination with air noise, which is above ambient noise, is predicted to exceed LAeq 16 h 54 dB or LAeq 8 h 48 dB; and all monetary amounts are to be subject to indexation annually in accordance with the Consumer Price Index (or in the event this is no longer being updated, a suitable alternative index) from the date on which the Order is made.

Airport operations

19

• (1) From the date of the commencement of dual runway operations, the airport may not be used for more than 389,000 aircraft movements per annum or a passenger throughput of 80.2 million passengers per annum.

• (2) The repositioned northern runway must not be used between the hours of 23:00 – 06:00 but may be used between these hours where the main runway is temporarily non-operational by reason of an accident, incident or structural defect or when maintenance to the main runway is being undertaken.

• (3) Subject to sub-paragraph (4), the repositioned northern runway must not be used—

• (a) for aircraft landings; or

• (b) for departures of aircraft larger than Code C aircraft.

• (4) Sub-paragraph (3) does not apply and the repositioned northern runway may be used in one or both of the ways stated in that sub-paragraph where the main runway is temporarily non-operational by reason of an accident, incident or structural defect or when maintenance to the main runway is being undertaken.

• (5) In this requirement—

• “Code C aircraft” means aircraft with dimensions meeting the maximum specifications of code letter C in the Aerodrome Reference Code table in Annex 14, Volume I to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, as at the date of this Order; and

• “passenger throughput” means the number of passengers that use the airport as part of aircraft movements but excluding persons under the age of two years.

Surface access

20

• (1) On or after the date on which the authorised development begins the undertaker must comply with, and the operation of the airport must be carried out in accordance with the surface access commitments unless otherwise agreed in writing with—

• (a) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited in respect of commitments 14A and 14B; or

• (b) CBC and National Highways (in consultation with Surrey County Council and West Sussex County Council) in respect of any other commitment or matter.

• (2) Subject to sub-paragraph (3), the commencement of dual runway operations and/or first use of Work No. 6(a) (Pier 7) must not take place unless and until the annual monitoring report for the year immediately prior demonstrates that at least 54% of airport passengers’ journeys to and from the airport were made by public transport, unless otherwise agreed by CBC.

• (3) Commencement of dual runway operations and/first use of Work No. 6(a) (Pier 7) may take place notwithstanding sub-paragraph (2) if the annual monitoring report for the year immediately prior shows that in the monitored year there were fewer than 24 million airport passenger vehicle trips travelling to and from the airport.

• (4) First use of Work No. 6a (Pier 7) and Work Nos. 28(a), 28(b) and 30(b) must not take place until the undertaker has completed construction of the highway works (and made an application to National Highways for a provisional certificate under paragraph 28 of Part 3 of Schedule 9).

• (5) In this requirement—

• “annual monitoring report” has the same meaning as defined in the surface access commitments; and

• “vehicle trips” means journeys using car-based modes (such as car, taxi and car rental) and includes passengers using drop off/pick up zones, on-airport cart parks and off-airport car parks that are subject to annual counts to determine the number of trips.

Carbon action plan

21

From the date on which the authorised development begins, the authorised development and the operation of the airport must be carried out in accordance with the carbon action plan unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Secretary of State (following consultation with CBC).

Public rights of way

22

• (1) No development of any new or diverted public right of way listed in Part 3 of Schedule 4 (footways and cycle tracks) may be carried out until a public rights of way implementation plan for that public right of way has been submitted to and approved by the relevant highway authority.

• (2) Each public rights of way implementation plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the public rights of way management strategy and in accordance with the rights of way and access plans.

• (3) The development of any new or diverted public right of way listed in Part 3 of Schedule 4 must be carried out in accordance with the relevant public rights of way implementation plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing with the relevant highway authority.

Flood compensation delivery plan

23

• (1) Prior to the commencement of the first of the floodplain works requiring prior mitigation, a flood compensation delivery plan setting out the timeframe for delivering the fluvial mitigation works must be submitted to and approved in writing by CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council as lead local flood authority and the Environment Agency).

• (2) The undertaker is required to consider the Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Data published quarterly by the Environment Agency in the flood compensation delivery plan in consultation with the Environment Agency and the lead local flood authority.

• (3) The authorised development must be constructed in accordance with the flood compensation delivery plan referred to in sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC (in consultation with West Sussex County Council as lead local flood authority and the Environment Agency).

• (4) In this requirement—

• (a) “floodplain works requiring prior mitigation” means Work Nos. 3, 4(f), 4(g), 4(h), 4(i), 4(j)(ii), 15, 20, 23(b), 23(c), 23(d), 29, 32, 34(a), 34(c), 36(c), 36(e), 36(f), 36(p), 36(q), 36(w), 36(x), 36(y), 37(a), 37(b), 37(f), 37(g), 37(h), 37(i), 37(j), 37(l), 37(m) and 37(n); and

• (b) “fluvial mitigation works” means Work Nos. 31(b), 31(c), 38(a), 39(a), 39(b), 39(c) and 39(e).

Flood resilience statement

24

On or after the date on which the authorised development begins, the authorised development and the operation of the airport must be carried out in accordance with the flood resilience statement unless otherwise agreed in writing with CBC.

Operational waste management plan

25

• (1) Work No. 9 (replacement CARE facility) must not be commenced until an operational waste management plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by West Sussex County Council.

• (2) The operational waste management plan submitted under sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the operational waste management strategy.

• (3) The airport must be operated in accordance with the operational waste management plan approved by West Sussex County Council unless otherwise agreed in writing with West Sussex County Council.

Water treatment works footpath

26

• (1) Prior to the commencement of Work No. 43 (water treatment works) a public access by foot must be provided between the accesses marked “A” and “B” on the water treatment works footpath plan.

• (2) Once provided, the public access by foot described in sub-paragraph (1) must not be removed until construction of Work No. 43 is complete.

Construction dust management plan

27

• (1) No construction activities that may generate dust may be carried out until a construction dust management plan for those activities has been submitted to and approved by CBC.

• (2) Each construction dust management plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the construction dust management strategy.

• (3) Construction activities that may generate dust must be carried out in accordance with the relevant construction dust management plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC.

Arboricultural and vegetation method statement

28

• (1) No vegetation or tree clearance may be carried out until an arboricultural and vegetation method statement for the area within which such works are to be carried out has been submitted to and approved by CBC (in consultation with MVDC, RBBC and TDC to the extent that they are the relevant planning authority for any land to which the statement relates).

• (2) Each arboricultural and vegetation method statement submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the outline arboricultural and vegetation method statement.

• (3) Vegetation or tree clearance must be carried out in accordance with the relevant arboricultural and vegetation method statement approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC (in consultation with MVDC, RBBC and TDC to the extent that they are the relevant planning authority for any land to which the statement relates).

Soil management plan

29

• (1) No soil removal may be carried out until a soil management plan for that soil has been submitted to and approved by CBC.

• (2) Each soil management plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must be substantially in accordance with the soil management strategy.

• (3) Removed soil must be managed in accordance with the relevant soil management plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC.

Site waste management plan

30

• (1) No part of the authorised development is to commence until a site waste management plan for that part has been submitted to and approved in writing by the relevant authority.

• (2) The site waste management plan submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must include the form of sections A1, A2, A3 and A4 of Annex A to the construction resources and waste management plan.

• (3) Construction waste arising from that part of the authorised development must be managed in accordance with the measures set out in the form of section A1 of the site waste management plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing by the relevant authority.

• (4) A form of section A5 of Annex A to the construction resources and waste management plan must be maintained throughout the duration of the construction of that part of the authorised development and must be made available to the relevant authority upon request.

• (5) In this requirement, the “relevant authority” means, in respect of a part of the authorised development—

• (a) in West Sussex, West Sussex County Council;

• (b) in Surrey, Surrey County Council; and

• (c) partly in each of West Sussex and Surrey, West Sussex County Council (in consultation with Surrey County Council).

Construction sequencing

31

• (1) The commencement of dual runway operations must not take place until Work No. 43 (water treatment works) has been completed.

• (2) Work No. 39(b) (River Mole culverts and syphons) must not be commenced until Work No. 42(b) (weir and fish pass) has been completed.

• (3) The undertaker must prepare and provide to Thames Water Utilities Limited a development phasing plan which will include forecast passenger growth numbers for the period up to the commencement of dual runway operations and ten years after the commencement of dual runway operations. The development phasing plan must include detailed forecasts of the wastewater discharge rates and expected connection points for the authorised development throughout this period and be based on hydraulic modelling undertaken by Thames Water Utilities Limited or the undertaker in consultation with Thames Water Utilities Limited and validated by Thames Water Utilities Limited in writing.

• (4) If the hydraulic modelling is undertaken by the undertaker in consultation with Thames Water Utilities Limited—

• (a) Thames Water Utilities Limited will provide a formal review and response within 3 calendar months of receipt of the undertaker’s hydraulic modelling, which will either indicate the results are validated or the steps required to validate the results;

• (b) the undertaker will comply with those steps in order to achieve validation of their hydraulic modelling for submission to Thames Water Utilities Limited within a further 3 calendar months; and

• (c) Thames Water Utilities Limited will respond to the updated submission within 3 calendar months of receipt.

• (5) If, when responding under sub-paragraph (4)(c), Thames Water Utilities Limited concludes that the undertaker has not complied with the steps pursuant to sub-paragraph (4)(b), this question is to be referred to an independent Chartered Engineer (to be agreed between Thames Water Utilities Limited and the undertaker or, if not agreed, to be appointed by the President of the Chartered Institute of Water and Environment Management upon the request of either party). The decision of the Chartered Engineer is binding as to whether the hydraulic modelling is validated for the purpose of sub-paragraph (3).

• (6) The details in the development phasing plan provided pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) must not materially exceed the forecast annual passenger numbers shown for the equivalent time periods for the airport with the authorised development in Table 9.2-1 of the forecast data book.

• (7) Thames Water Utilities Limited must confirm in writing within twelve months of the provision of the development phasing plan pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) whether its infrastructure will be able to accommodate the additional foul water flows from the airport for the ten-year period after the commencement of dual runway operations.

• (8) The commencement of Work No. 44 (wastewater treatment works) must not take place until either—

• (a) Thames Water Utilities Limited confirms that its infrastructure will not be able to accommodate the additional foul water flows;

• (b) Thames Water Utilities Limited has not provided any confirmation pursuant to sub-paragraph (7) within the time period specified therein; or

• (c) Thames Water Utilities Limited has not responded pursuant to sub-paragraph (4)(a) or (4)(c) within the time period specified therein,

unless otherwise agree in writing by Thames Water Utilities Limited.

• (9) The commencement of dual runway operations must not take place until either—

• (a) Work No. 44 (wastewater treatment works) has been completed, and an application has been submitted for an environmental permit under regulation 12(1)(b) (requirement for an environmental permit) of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016[^f00106] for its operation; or

• (b) Thames Water Utilities Limited confirms that its infrastructure will be able to accommodate the additional foul water flows,

unless otherwise agreed in writing by Thames Water Utilities Limited.

Western noise mitigation bund

32

• (1) The commencement of dual runway operations must not take place until Work No. 18(b) (replacement noise bund and wall) has been completed.

• (2) Once completed, Work No. 18(b) must not be removed unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC.

• (3) During the carrying out of Work No. 18(a) (removal of existing western noise bund) and the construction of Work No. 18(b) (replacement noise bund and wall), no ground engine testing may take place on Work No. 4(i) (Taxiway Juliet West Spur) unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC.

North and South Terminal roundabouts BAU improvement scheme

33

• (1) Prior to the first of—

• (a) the commencement of dual runway operations;

• (b) the commencement of the first of Work No. 35 (South Terminal Junction improvements) and Work No. 36 (North Terminal Junction improvements); or

• (c) the third anniversary of the commencement of the authorised development,

the North and South Terminal roundabouts BAU improvement scheme must be completed, unless otherwise agreed with National Highways.

• (2) In this requirement—

• (a) “North and South Terminal roundabouts BAU improvement scheme” means a scheme of construction, not forming part of the authorised development, to implement traffic signal control and add further entry and exit lane and roundabout circulatory capacity at the North and South Terminal roundabouts, to be agreed with National Highways and to be in general accordance with the North and South Terminal roundabouts BAU improvement scheme plans and the detailed design of which will be agreed separately with National Highways; and

• (b) “North and South Terminal roundabouts BAU improvement scheme plans” means the document of that description certified by the Secretary of State under article 50 (certification of documents, etc.).

Office occupier

34

Work No. 28(b) (office at Car Park H site) must only be occupied by an entity related to, or whose business and/or operations are related to, the airport, air travel and/or aviation, unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC.

Odour monitoring and management plan

35

On or after the date of the commencement of the authorised development, the authorised development and the operation of the airport must be carried out in accordance with the odour monitoring and management plan unless otherwise agreed in writing by CBC (in consultation with RBBC).

36

Not used.

Car parking spaces

37

• (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Class F of Part 8 (transport related development) of Schedule 2 to the 2015 Regulations, (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no additional car parking is to be provided within the Order limits unless otherwise agreed by CBC.

• (2) In sub-paragraph (1) “additional car parking” means—

• (a) the provision of more than 53,260 car parking spaces; or

• (b) allowing the parking of more than 53,260 airport passengers’ and staff cars at any given time.

• (3) Upon commencement of the authorised development and by no later than each anniversary of that date, the undertaker must submit an annual report to CBC providing an update on the number of car parking spaces provided by the undertaker within the Order limits and airport passengers and staff cars parked within the Order limits.

• (4) In this requirement—

• “car parking spaces” means space or spaces available for all car parking products provided by the undertaker including self-park, block-park, valet parking, staff parking and any other parking types used by airport passengers and staff within the Order limits; and

• “staff” means those people who are employed directly by Gatwick Airport Limited or any other employer at the airport and who class the buildings and operational areas of the airport as their main place of work (in accordance with employer and employee travel surveys.

• (5) In sub-paragraph (2) the number “53,260” includes a maximum of 47,180 car parking spaces for airport passengers or a maximum of 47,180 airport passengers’ cars, as appropriate.

Speed limit monitoring

38

• (1) No part of Work Nos. 35, 36 or 37 (surface access works) is to commence until a speed limit monitoring plan for those works has been submitted to and approved in writing by West Sussex County Council (in consultation with Surrey County Council and National Highways).

• (2) The speed limit monitoring plan must include—

• (a) as a minimum, one survey to be carried out before commencement of the first of Work Nos. 35, 36 or 37 (surface access works) and two surveys to be carried out after completion of the last of those works to assess the changes in traffic speed on the local and strategic highway networks;

• (b) the locations to be monitored and the methodology to be used to collect the required data;

• (c) the periods over which traffic is to be monitored (each such period to be no longer in duration than 14 days);

• (d) the submission of survey data and interpretative reports to West Sussex County Council; and

• (e) a description of the manner in which the undertaker would propose to address excessive speeding identified through the monitoring.

• (3) The authorised development must be carried out in accordance with the speed limit monitoring plan approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) unless otherwise agreed in writing with West Sussex County Council (in consultation with Surrey County Council and National Highways).

Tree balance statement

39

• (1) The undertaker must submit a tree balance statement to CBC for approval—

• (a) within 3 months of the date of commencement of dual runway operations;

• (b) within 3 months of the third anniversary of commencement of dual runway operations; and

• (c) within 3 months of the sixth anniversary of commencement of dual runway operations.

• (2) The tree balance statements referred to in sub-paragraph (1) should follow the methodology set out in Policy DD4 of the Crawley Borough Council Local Plan 2023-2040 and the Green Infrastructure SPD 2016, and must include the following totals up to and including the date of commencement of dual runway operations and the third and sixth anniversaries respectively—

• (a) the total number of trees that have been removed as part of the authorised development;

• (b) the total number of replacement trees that are required on the basis of the CBC tree replacement requirement; and

• (c) the total number of trees that have been provided as part of the authorised development.

• (3) In the event that the tree balance statement submitted on the sixth anniversary of the commencement of dual runway operations pursuant to sub-paragraph (1)(c) identifies that the total number of trees that has been provided as part of the authorised development is less than that required by the application of the CBC tree replacement requirement, the undertaker must pay the tree mitigation contribution to CBC within 60 days of the approval of the tree balance statement by CBC under sub-paragraph (1).

• (4) In this requirement—

• “CBC tree replacement requirement” means the number of replacement trees required on the basis of the number as per paragraph (2)(a), calculated in accordance with the table in Policy DD4 (Tree Replacement Standards) of the Crawley Borough Local Plan 2023-2040 (adopted on 16 October 2024);

• “tree mitigation contribution” means the sum sought pursuant to Policy DD4 (Tree Replacement Standards) of the Crawley Borough Local Plan 2023-2040 and calculated in accordance with the tree mitigation formula to be paid to CBC and used towards the provision of tree planting and maintenance in the borough of Crawley or within the area of any of the host authorities which is a district council; and

• “tree mitigation contribution formula” means the formula as set out in paragraphs 3.13 to 3.14 and Table 1 of the CBC Green Infrastructure Supplementary Planning Document (adopted on 5 October 2016).

PART 2 — PROCEDURE FOR DISCHARGE OF REQUIRMENTS

Applications made under requirements

40

• (1) Where an application has been made to a discharging authority for any agreement, endorsement or approval required by a requirement included in this Order, the discharging authority must give notice to the undertaker of its decision on the application before the end of the decision period.

• (2) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1), the decision period is—

• (a) in the case of requirements in respect of which the discharging authority has a duty under this Schedule to consult with any other body—

• (i) where no further information is requested under this paragraph, 8 weeks from the day immediately following that on which the application is received by the discharging authority;

• (ii) where further information is requested under this paragraph, 8 weeks from the day immediately following that on which further information has been supplied by the undertaker under this paragraph; or

• (iii) such longer period as may be agreed by the undertaker and the discharging authority in writing before the end of the period in sub-paragraph (i) or (ii); and

• (b) in the case of requirements in respect of which the discharging authority has no duty under this Schedule to consult with any other body—

• (i) where no further information is requested under this paragraph, 6 weeks from the day immediately following that on which the application is received by the discharging authority;

• (ii) where further information is requested under this paragraph, 6 weeks from the day immediately following that on which further information has been supplied by the undertaker under this paragraph; or

• (iii) such longer period as may be agreed by the undertaker and the discharging authority in writing before the end of the period in sub-paragraph (i) or (ii).

• (3) In the case of requirements in respect of which the discharging authority has a duty under this Schedule to consult with any other body, the discharging authority must have regard to comments received from any of those bodies.

Further information

41

• (1) In relation to any application to which this Schedule applies, the discharging authority has the right to request such further information from the undertaker as is necessary to enable it to consider the application.

• (2) If the discharging authority considers such further information to be necessary and the requirement does not specify that consultation with a requirement consultee is required, the discharging authority must, within 14 days of receipt of the application, notify the undertaker in writing specifying the further information required.

• (3) If the requirement specifies that consultation with a requirement consultee is required, the undertaker must issue the consultation to the requirement consultee within 5 days of submitting the application, and must notify the discharging authority in writing.

• (4) If the discharging authority does not give notification as specified in sub-paragraph (2) or (3), or otherwise fails to request any further information within the timescales provided for in this paragraph it will be deemed to have sufficient information to consider the application and will not thereafter be entitled to request further information without the prior agreement of the undertaker.

SCHEDULE 3 — STOPPING UP OF STREETS AND PRIVATE MEANS OF ACCESS AND PROVISIONS OF NEW STREETS AND PRIVATE MEANS OF ACCESS

PART 1 — STREETS TO BE STOPPED UP AND SUBSTITUTE STREETS AND NEW STREETS TO BE PROVIDED

(1) Area	(2) Street to be stopped up	(3) Extent of stopping up	(4) New street to be substituted
Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a1 the reclassified/realigned Gatwick Spur (including the South Terminal Flyover); formerly the M23 Spur, between the M23 Junction 9 Roundabout and the Airport Way approach to the west-facing slip roads of South Terminal Roundabout, for a distance of 1.5km as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	M23 Spur Westbound	The existing highway within the area marked A2 for a distance of 245m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; Gatwick Spur Westbound Diverge, within the area marked a2 for a distance of 420m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	M23 Spur Eastbound	The existing highway within the area marked A3 for a distance of 250m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; Gatwick Spur Eastbound Merge, within the area marked a3 for a distance of 330m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a4 the realigned Ring Road South from the South Terminal Roundabout southbound to South Terminal, for a distance of 85m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a5, the realigned South Terminal Roundabout, for a circulatory carriageway distance of 310m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a6 the realigned Ring Road North from the South Terminal northbound to South Terminal Roundabout, for a distance of 80m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	Airport Way Westbound	The existing highway within the area marked A7 for a distance of 40m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; Airport Way Westbound Merge, within the area marked a7 for a distance of 275m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	Airport Way Eastbound	The existing highway within the area marked A8 for a distance of 140m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; Airport Way Eastbound Diverge, within the area marked a8 for a distance of 265m as shown on Sheet 2 the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a9 the realigned Airport Way, between the Airport Way Rail Bridge and South Terminal Flyover, for a distance of 245m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a10 the realigned B2036 Balcombe Road for a distance of 160m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, show by a blue striped hatching on Inset B.
Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1
West Sussex County Council	Airport Way	The existing highway within the area marked A11 for a distance of 620m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching. The existing highway within the area marked A12 for a distance of 175m as shown on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; realigned Airport Way from the Airport Way Rail Bridge to the start of the proposed North Terminal Flyover Link, within the area marked a11 for a distance of 525m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	Airport Way	The existing highway within the area marked A13 for a distance of 200m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching. The existing highway within the area marked A14 for a distance of 135m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching. The existing highway within the area marked A15 for a distance of 15m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed new highway; realigned Airport Way from Airport Way Westbound Diverge to North Terminal Roundabout, within the area marked a12 for a distance of 425m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a13 the realigned North Terminal Roundabout Segregated Lane, for a distance of 195m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a14 the realigned Gatwick Way from the priority junction with North Terminal Roundabout Segregated Lane to Perimeter Road North for a distance of 165m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a15 the realigned Perimeter Road from Northway Road Tunnel Eastbound for a distance of 270m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a16 the realigned North Terminal Approach Road from North Terminal Roundabout to North Terminal Airport for a distance of 125m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	North Terminal Roundabout	The existing circulatory carriageway within the area marked A17 for a distance of 140m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Reference a17 the realigned/improved North Terminal Roundabout; for a distance of 265m, as shown on Sheet 1 the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a18 the realigned Northway on the approach to North Terminal Roundabout for a distance of 60m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council, Gatwick Airport	-	-	Reference a19 the realigned Longbridge Way northwest of North Terminal Roundabout, for a distance of 90m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	A23 London Road Merge from North Terminal Roundabout	The existing highway within the area marked A20 for a distance of 315m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching on Inset B.	Proposed new highway; North Terminal Link, within the area marked a20 for a distance of 110m, as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Proposed new highway; North Terminal Flyover Link from the realigned Airport Way Westbound to the merge on to A23 London Road, within the area marked a21 for a distance of 650m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	-	-	Reference a22 the realigned A23 London Road including the proposed signal-controlled junction with North Terminal Link, Southeast of Longbridge Roundabout for a distance of 1km as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	-	-	Reference a23 the realigned and reconfigured A23 London Road Diverge to Airport Way Eastbound for a distance of 695m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council	A23 London Road Diverge to North Terminal Roundabout	The existing highway within the area marked A24 for a distance of 185m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching on Inset B.	Proposed new highway; A23 London Road Northbound Left-in Diverge to North Terminal Roundabout, within the area marked a24 for a distance of 380m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by green striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	Reference a25 the realigned A23 Brighton Road Northeast of Longbridge Roundabout for a distance of 220m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	-	-	Reference a26 the realigned Longbridge Roundabout Segregated Left Turn Lane from A23 Brighton Road to A23 London Road for a distance of 225m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	Longbridge Roundabout	The existing highway within the area marked A27 for a distance of 80m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by black striped hatching.	Proposed realigned/improved highway; Longbridge Roundabout, within the area marked a27 for a circulatory carriageway distance of 215m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	Reference a28 the realigned A217 Northwest of Longbridge Roundabout for a distance of 95m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	Reference a29 the realigned Povey Cross Road Southwest of Longbridge Roundabout for a distance of 55m as shown on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans, shown by blue striped hatching.

PART 2 — PRIVATE MEANS OF ACCESS TO BE STOPPED UP AND SUBSTITUTE PRIVATE MEANS AND NEW PRIVATE MEANS

(1) Area	(2) Private means of access to be stopped up	(3) Extent of stopping up	(4) New private means of access to be substituted/provided
Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2
Surrey County Council	Reference D1	The existing private means of access for the extents marked as D1 which is a private access off of Gatwick Spur (formerly M23 Spur) for a distance of 10m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown by purple striped hatching.	The newly proposed private means of access for the extents marked as d1 which provides access to an existing Pond to the east of Peeks Brook Lane for a distance of 230m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	The newly proposed private means of access for the extents marked as d2 which provides access to a proposed Pond to the east of B2036 Balcombe Road for a distance of 85m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
West Sussex Country Council	-	-	The newly proposed private means of access for the extents marked as d3 which provides access to a proposed retaining wall to the east of South Terminal Roundabout for a distance of 365m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1
Surrey County Council	-	-	The modified existing private means of access for the extents marked as d4 which provides access to Car Park B for a distance of 125m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	Reference D5	The existing private means of access for the extents marked as D5 which is a private access to the Holiday Inn off of A217 for a distance of 5m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by purple striped hatching.	The modified existing private means of access for the extents marked as d5 which provides access to Holiday Inn London – Gatwick Airport located west of the A217 for a distance of 10m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	The modified existing private means of access for the extents marked as d6 which provides access to the farm located east of the A217 for a distance of 55m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.
Surrey County Council	-	-	The newly proposed private means of access for the extents marked as d7 which provides access to a proposed attenuation basin to the east of the A217 for a distance of 20m and connects to private means of access d6 which runs east of the A217 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by orange striped hatching.

SCHEDULE 4 — PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, FOOTWAYS AND CYCLE TRACKS TO BE STOPPED UP

PART 1 — PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY TO BE DIVERTED FOR WHICH A SUBSTITUTE IS TO BE PROVIDED

(1) Area	(2) Public right of way to be diverted	(3) Extent of stopping up	(4) New public right of way to be substituted
Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2	Sheet 2
West Sussex County Council	Footpath 367Sy – Reference B1	The existing footpath for the extents marked as B1 for a distance of 290m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown by a red dash-diamond line.	Proposed public footpath 367Sy for the extents marked as b1 for a distance of approximately 300m on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a cyan dashed line.
Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1
West Sussex County Council	Footpath 346_2Sy – Reference B3	The existing footpath for the extents marked as B3 for a distance of 100m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by a red dash-diamond line.	Proposed public footpath 346_2Sy for the extents marked as b3 for a distance of 95m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a cyan dashed line.

PART 2 — PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY TO BE PERMANENTLY STOPPED UP FOR WHICH NO SUBSTITUTE IS TO BE PROVIDED

(1) Area	(2) Public right of way to be stopped up	(3) Extent of stopping up
Sheet 1	Sheet 1	Sheet 1
West Sussex County Council	Footpath 346_2Sy – Reference B2	The existing footpath for the extents marked as B2 for a distance of 860m on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown by a red dash-diamond line.

PART 3 — FOOTWAYS AND CYCLE TRACKS

(1) Area	(2) Length of Footway/Cycle Track
Sheet 2	Sheet 2
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c1 on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 380m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c27 on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 145m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c28 on Sheet 2 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 5m.
Sheet 1	Sheet 1
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c2 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 405m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c3 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 45m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c4 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 45m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c5 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 185m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c6 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 75m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c7 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 50m.
West Sussex County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c8 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 170m.
West Sussex County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c9 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 45m.
West Sussex County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c10 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 350m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c11 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 155m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c12 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 220m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c13 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 655m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c14 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 5m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track ramp between the points marked c15 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 120m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c16 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 255m.
West Sussex County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c17 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of approximately 105m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c18 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 70m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c19 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 35m.
Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c20 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 60m.
Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c21 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 60m.
Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c22 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 100m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c23 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 95m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c24 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 55m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c25 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c26 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 20m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c29 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 5m.
West Sussex County Council	Footway between the points marked c30 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c31 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 50m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c32 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 15m.
Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c33 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 80m.
Surrey County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c34 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
Surrey County Council	Footway between the points marked c35 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a green solid hatch for a distance of 5m.
Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c36 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 15m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c37 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 40m.
West Sussex County Council and Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c38 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
Surrey County Council	Segregated cycle track between the points marked c39 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a pink solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c40 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 10m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c41 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 5m.
West Sussex County Council	Shared-use cycle track between the points marked c42 on Sheet 1 of the rights of way and access plans shown indicatively with a blue solid hatch for a distance of 70m.

SCHEDULE 5 — CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS

PART 1 — NEW AND REALIGNED CLASSIFIED TRUNK ROADS

(1) Highway Authority	(2) Extent of Road
Sheet 2A	Sheet 2A
National Highways	The realigned M23 Spur Westbound between point 1a and point 1b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans to be re-classified as an A Road (to be known as Gatwick Spur) for a length of 1250m.
National Highways	The realigned Gatwick Spur /Airport Way Westbound between point 1b and point 1c as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures –Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 525m.
National Highways	The realigned Airport Way Eastbound between point 2a and point 2b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 520m.
National Highways	The realigned M23 Spur Eastbound between point 2b and point 2c as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans to be re-classified as an A Road (to be known as Gatwick Spur) for a length of 1250m.
National Highways	The new proposed Gatwick Spur Westbound Diverge between point 3a and point 3b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures –Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 420m.
National Highways	The new proposed Gatwick Spur Eastbound Merge between point 4a and point 4b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures –Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 330m.
National Highways	The realigned South Terminal Roundabout (currently M23 Junction 9a) shown as point 7 on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures –Classification of Roads Plans to be re-classified as an A Road for a length of 310m.
National Highways	The new proposed Airport Way Westbound Merge between point 9a and point 9b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 275m.
National Highways	The new proposed Airport Way Eastbound Diverge between point 10a and point 10b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures –Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 265m.
Sheet 1A	Sheet 1A
National Highways	The realigned Airport Way Westbound between point 1c and point 11a as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 525m.
National Highways	The new proposed North Terminal Flyover Link between point 11a and point 11b as shown on Sheet 1A of Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 650m.
National Highways	The realigned Airport Way Diverge to North Terminal Roundabout between point 12a and point 12b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 430m.
National Highways	The realigned North Terminal Roundabout Segregated Lane to North Terminal Approach between point 13a and point 13b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 220m.
National Highways	The realigned North Terminal Roundabout shown as point 18 on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 265m.
National Highways	The new proposed North Terminal Link between point 21a and point 21b on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 110m.
National Highways	The realigned A23 London Road Diverge to Airport Way Eastbound between point 22a and point 2a as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 610m.
National Highways	The proposed new A23 London Road Northbound Left-in Diverge to North Terminal Roundabout between point 24a and point 24b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 325m.

PART 2 — NEW AND REALIGNED CLASSIFIED NON-TRUNK ROADS

(1) Highway Authority	(2) Extent of Road
Sheet 2A	Sheet 2A
West Sussex County Council	The realigned B2036 Balcombe Road between point 5a and point 5b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 160m.
Sheet 1A	Sheet 1A
West Sussex County Council	The realigned A23 London Road Northbound between point 23a and point 23b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 1155m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned A23 London Road Northbound between point 23b and point 25b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 10m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned A23 London Road Southbound between point 26a and point 26b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 10m.
West Sussex County Council	The realigned A23 London Road Southbound between point 26b and point 27b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 1150m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned Longbridge Roundabout shown as point 31 on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 210m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned A23 Brighton Road between point 28a and point 28b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 220m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned Longbridge Roundabout Segregated Left Turn Lane from A23 Brighton Road onto A23 London Road between point 29a and point 29b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 120m.
West Sussex County Council	The realigned Longbridge Roundabout Segregated Left Turn Lane from A23 Brighton Road onto A23 London Road between point 29b and point 30b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 90m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned A217 between point 32a and point 32b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 110m.
Surrey County Council	The realigned Povey Cross Road between point 33a and point 33b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 60m.

PART 3 — NEW AND REALIGNED UNCLASSIFIED ROADS

(1) Highway Authority	(2) Extent of Street
Sheet 2A	Sheet 2A
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Ring Road South between point 6a and point 6b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 85m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Ring Road North between point 8a and point 8b as shown on Sheet 2A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 80m.
Sheet 1A	Sheet 1A
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned North Terminal Roundabout Segregated Lane to North Terminal Approach between point 13b and point 14b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 70m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Gatwick Way between point 15a and point 15b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 165m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Perimeter Road North between point 16a and point 16b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 270m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned North Terminal Approach Road between point 17a and point 17b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 125m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Northway between point 19a and point 19b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 65m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Longbridge Way between point 20a and point 20b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 90m.
Gatwick Airport Limited	The realigned Car Park B access road between point 34a and point 34b as shown on Sheet 1A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans for a length of 125m

PART 4 — ROADS TO BE DE-TRUNKED

(1) Highway Authority	(2) Extent of Road
Sheet 1A	Sheet 1A
West Sussex County Council	Existing Merge Slip Road from North Terminal Roundabout to A23 London Road Northbound between point A1 and point A2 as shown on Sheet 1A in Inset A of the Traffic Regulation Measures – Classification of Roads Plans to be de-trunked for a length of 135m.

SCHEDULE 6 — TRAFFIC REGULATION MEASURES

PART 1 — SPEED LIMITS